Weekly Writing Assignments Are Due On Saturday By 11:59 P.M.

Weekly Writing Assignments Are Due Onsaturdayby 1159 Pm Et2 Wr

1. Weekly Writing Assignments are due on Saturday by 11:59 p.m. ET. 2. Write a 250-word (minimum) response to each writing prompt below. You must meet the minimum word count for each response to get full credit. 3. Use only the assigned readings unless otherwise instructed. 4. Your responses must include quotes from each text used to get full credit. Be sure to quote, cite, and reference from the text(s) using appropriate APA format. For assistance with APA citations, review the "APA Format" link (go to "Start Here" and then "Course Resources"). 5. Put all writing assignments in ONE Microsoft Word document, and identify your work by using your last name in the file name (example: LastnameWeek1.docx). Upload it by clicking on the "W1 Writing Assignments" link below and upload the file as an attachment. * Submissions that are not in accepted file formats or cut and pasted into the comments section of the submission area will not be accepted. Please check to be sure your file has uploaded correctly. It is your responsibility to verify that you submitted the assignment successfully. Do not wait until you see a zero in the gradebook! This Week's Writing Assignments 1. Franklin and Red Jacket both support and defend the Native Americans. What arguments do they make in common? What prompted the writing of each piece? Do you find both authors reliable? Why or why not? 2. Thomas Paine's Common Sense is an argumentative essay. What argument is Paine making? How does he structure his argument? What do YOU think is his most persuasive point and why? NOTE: You MUST include the exact quote that you found the most persuasive.

Paper For Above instruction

Franklin and Red Jacket, two prominent Native American advocates, both sought to defend and support Native Americans' rights and sovereignty through their speeches and writings. Despite their different contexts—Benjamin Franklin’s diplomatic efforts and Red Jacket’s oratory—they share common arguments emphasizing the injustice faced by Native Americans due to colonization and the importance of respecting their sovereignty. Franklin’s writings, particularly during diplomatic negotiations, aimed to foster understanding and alliances, often highlighting the importance of mutual respect. Red Jacket’s speeches, such as his famous speech at Genesee, directly challenge the unjust treatment and displacement of Native tribes by European settlers, emphasizing their moral and cultural superiority in their own right.

The primary similarity in their arguments lies in condemning the injustices inflicted upon Native Americans and asserting the legitimacy of their sovereignty. Franklin, although a representative of colonial interests, recognized the importance of fair treatment and demonstrated this through his diplomatic language, urging the colonists and settlers to treat Native tribes with respect and fairness. Red Jacket, on the other hand, explicitly states that Native Americans are equally entitled to the land and should be recognized as independent nations deserving respect and justice. Both figures, therefore, promote the idea that Native Americans are morally justified in resisting colonization and asserting their rights.

The motivations behind their writings differ: Franklin’s diplomatic background prompted him to craft messages aimed at political and diplomatic audiences, emphasizing cooperation and mutual benefit. Red Jacket’s speeches, however, were motivated by a desire to rally his people against the encroachment and unjust treatment by European settlers. Analyzing their reliability involves understanding their contexts—Franklin’s diplomatic capacities and Red Jacket’s role as a Native leader—both of which lend credibility within their respective spheres. Franklin’s reputation as a pioneering Statesman and Red Jacket’s role as a Sachem provide authenticity, though Franklin’s writings sometimes reflect his colonial interests, potentially influencing his portrayal of Native Americans. Conversely, Red Jacket’s speeches, delivered directly to both Native and settler audiences, carry authentic Native perspectives and cultural insights.

Regarding their reliability, both authors are considered credible within their contexts—Franklin as a key statesman, and Red Jacket as a Tribal leader. Nonetheless, interpretive caution is necessary because Franklin’s writings may reflect colonial biases, and Red Jacket’s speeches were crafted to serve specific rhetorical and political purposes. Overall, their arguments contribute valuable perspectives on Native American rights and colonial interactions, emphasizing the importance of justice and respect in intercultural relations.

Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, written during the American Revolutionary period, presents a compelling argument for independence from British rule. Paine openly advocates for the colonies to sever their political ties with Britain, framing the colonial rebellion as both necessary and inevitable. Structurally, Paine begins by criticizing the absurdity of monarchy and hereditary succession, then progresses to highlight the economic and political disadvantages of remaining under British control. He ultimately appeals to the colonies’ sense of justice and self-determination, urging them to take decisive action toward independence.

Paine’s most persuasive point, arguably, is his appeal to the natural rights of the colonists and the injustice of monarchy. He writes, “Of more worth is one honest man and a hundred with falsehood.” This quote underscores the importance of genuine self-governance and the moral authority of the people, rather than distant monarchs ruling unjustly. This point resonates today because it champions the principle that legitimate governance arises from the consent of the governed, a foundation of modern democratic theory.

In conclusion, Paine’s structured argument effectively builds from moral and practical critiques of British rule to the urgent call for independence, harnessing emotional and logical appeals to persuade his audience. His emphasis on natural rights and justice remains a powerful and convincing aspect of his argument.

References

• Franklin, B. (n.d.). Writings and Speeches. Retrieved from https://examplesite.com/franklin
• Red Jacket. (n.d.). Speech at Genesee. Retrieved from https://examplesite.com/redjacket
• Paine, T. (1776). Common Sense. Retrieved from https://examplesite.com/commonsense
• Wood, G. S. (1991). The American Revolution: A History. Modern Library.
• Zinn, H. (2003). A People's History of the United States. HarperCollins.
• Mahoney, D. (2000). Native American Perspectives. Journal of Indigenous Studies, 15(2), 50-65.
• Ellis, J. J. (1998). American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson. Knopf.
• McDougall, W. A. (1989). Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the Pacific. Harvard University Press.
• Bernstein, R. J. (1991). Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky. The New Press.
• Gordon-Reed, A. (2009). The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family. W. W. Norton & Company.