What Are Some Of The Major Security Threats Caused By Illega ✓ Solved

What are some of the major security threats caused by illegal immigration in US?

This assignment requires applying qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research approaches to the topic of major security threats caused by illegal immigration in the United States. For each approach, select one specific method, discuss how it can be used to answer the research question, and explore its merits and drawbacks concerning this topic. The paper should include a title page, followed by a section explaining the qualitative approach and method (about three-quarters of a page), a section on the quantitative approach and method (about three-quarters of a page), and a section on the mixed methods approach (about half a page). The content should be well-supported with scholarly sources, formatted according to APA style, and span 2-3 pages excluding the title and reference pages. Use Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced, and credible references such as peer-reviewed journals, books, and official reports. Wikipedia and encyclopedic sources are discouraged.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The complex issue of security threats associated with illegal immigration in the United States necessitates a comprehensive research approach that leverages qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. Each methodology offers unique insights and limitations, contributing to a fuller understanding of the issue. This paper explores how each approach and their respective methods can be utilized to analyze the security implications of illegal immigration.

Qualitative Approach and Method

The qualitative approach facilitates an in-depth understanding of the perceptions, experiences, and contextual factors related to security threats posed by illegal immigration. A suitable qualitative method for this research is in-depth interviews. By conducting interviews with law enforcement officials, border security personnel, and community leaders, researchers can gather nuanced insights into how illegal immigration affects security dynamics. These interviews can reveal perceptions of threats such as drug trafficking, human smuggling, and gang activity, which are often difficult to quantify but critical to understanding the security landscape.

The advantage of using interviews lies in their ability to capture detailed narratives and the subjective interpretations of stakeholders directly involved in immigration enforcement and community safety. However, the method's limitations include potential biases from interviewees, the time-consuming nature of data collection, and challenges in ensuring representative sampling. Despite these drawbacks, qualitative methods like interviews are invaluable for exploring complex security concerns that are deeply embedded in social and political contexts.

Quantitative Approach and Method

The quantitative approach emphasizes measurement and numerical analysis to assess the scope and scale of security threats related to illegal immigration. A relevant method here is the use of statistical analysis of crime data collected from federal, state, and local agencies. By analyzing trends in crime rates, arrest records, and immigration enforcement actions over time, researchers can quantify correlations between illegal immigration and specific security threats such as drug-related violence or human trafficking.

Mixed Methods Approach

The mixed methods approach combines qualitative and quantitative strategies to holistically examine the security threats stemming from illegal immigration. This approach allows for concurrent or sequential data collection, integrating rich contextual narratives with broad statistical trends. For example, researchers might conduct surveys to gather quantitative data on crime prevalence while also performing interviews to explore community perceptions of safety and illegal immigration’s impact.

The advantage of mixed methods is that it mitigates the limitations inherent in each individual approach by providing depth and breadth of understanding. It enables triangulation, enhancing the validity of findings and informing more comprehensive policy responses. However, this approach can be resource-intensive, requiring expertise in multiple methodologies and more extensive data collection efforts. Despite these challenges, mixed methods are particularly well-suited for examining complex social issues like security threats associated with illegal immigration, providing a nuanced and empirically grounded perspective.

Conclusion

In sum, employing qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods offers a robust framework for examining the security threats posed by illegal immigration in the United States. Each approach contributes unique insights: qualitative methods illuminate stakeholder perspectives; quantitative methods provide measurable data; and mixed methods synthesize both for a comprehensive analysis. Together, these methods can inform better-informed policy decisions aimed at addressing security concerns while respecting human rights and social considerations.

References

• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
• Fetzer, J. D. (2000). Public attitudes toward illegal immigration in the United States. Journal of Contemporary History, 35(2), 341-359.
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174-199.
• Kellstedt, P. M., & Whitten, K. (2018). The fundamentals of political science research. Cambridge University Press.
• Mohr, L. B. (1999). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. University of Michigan Press.
• Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
• O'Leary, Z. (2017). The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage Publications.
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.