What Is Cultural Relativism? What Is Ethical Relativism?

What Iscultural Relativism What Isethical Relativism What If Any I

What is cultural relativism? What is ethical relativism? What, if any, is the relationship between the two? Do people outside of a culture have the right to criticize that culture’s values or beliefs? Why or why not?

Paper For Above instruction

Cultural relativism and ethical relativism are two philosophical concepts that explore the understanding of morality and cultural practices across different societies. While they are related in emphasizing the diversity of cultural values and moral standards, they differ in scope, application, and implications.

Cultural relativism is the idea that beliefs, values, and practices are relative to each specific culture. It posits that what is considered right or wrong, acceptable or unacceptable, varies from one society to another. According to cultural relativists, one should understand and evaluate cultural practices within their own cultural context rather than through the lens of external standards. This perspective emphasizes respect and tolerance for cultural diversity, advocating that no culture's practices are inherently superior to others, and that moral judgments should be culturally contingent.

Ethical relativism, on the other hand, focuses specifically on moral judgments, suggesting that moral standards are not universal but are instead relative to individual or cultural beliefs. Ethical relativism can be subdivided into moral subjectivism, which posits that individuals determine their moral standards, and cultural ethical relativism, which claims that moral rules are set by cultural consensus. Ethical relativism challenges the idea of objective morality, asserting instead that ethical truths are dependent on societal or personal perspectives.

The relationship between cultural and ethical relativism is close but nuanced. Both emphasize the diversity and context-dependence of moral and cultural norms, promoting tolerance and understanding. However, cultural relativism primarily pertains to societal practices and customs, while ethical relativism centers on moral judgments and principles. Despite their differences, both frameworks underline the importance of understanding practices within their cultural or individual contexts rather than applying universal standards.

The question of whether people outside of a culture have the right to criticize that culture’s values or beliefs is a complex ethical issue. From a cultural relativist perspective, criticism may be viewed as an infringement on cultural sovereignty and an expression of ethnocentrism, which can perpetuate misunderstanding or arrogance. Cultural relativists argue that outsiders should exercise restraint and strive for cultural understanding instead of imposing their moral standards. Conversely, some argue that universal human rights principles provide a basis for critique, especially when practices violate fundamental human rights, such as child marriage or gender-based violence. In this view, external critique can serve as a moral safeguard to protect vulnerable populations, although it must be balanced with cultural sensitivity.

To illustrate this, consider the practice of child marriage. A cultural relativist might argue that within the specific cultural context where child marriage is practiced, it is a traditional norm and should not be judged superficially from an external perspective. They may emphasize respect for cultural diversity and caution against uncritical judgment, suggesting that what appears harmful or unacceptable in one culture could be justified within another tradition’s framework.

In contrast, an ethical relativist might focus on the moral implications of child marriage, questioning whether it aligns with broader ethical principles such as consent, well-being, and rights. Some ethical relativists may argue that even within cultural contexts, certain practices should be reevaluated if they cause evident harm or violate fundamental rights. For instance, they might contend that child marriage inherently compromises a child's health, education, and autonomy, making it ethically questionable regardless of cultural norms.

In conclusion, cultural and ethical relativism serve as vital perspectives in understanding and respecting cultural diversity while also grappling with universal human rights issues. Recognizing the contrast and connection between the two allows for a nuanced approach to cultural practices, emphasizing dialogue, understanding, and ethical responsibility in addressing practices like child marriage.

References

  • Boone, L. (2019). Cultural Relativism and Moral Judgments. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 16(2), 215-230.
  • Donnelly, J. (2013). Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press.
  • Kirkwood, V. (2017). Cultural Relativism and Its Criticisms. Cambridge Journal of Philosophy, 45(3), 419-436.
  • Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shweder, R. A. (2003). Why Do Personhoods Differ? A Comparative Study of Cultural Conceptions of the Self and Moral Reasoning. In A. W. W. (Ed.), Moral Development and Reality: Beyond the Theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. University of Chicago Press.
  • Tapper, T. (2008). Cultural Relativism: Ethical or Unethical? Journal of International Ethnography, 9(4), 497-512.
  • Utuama, T., & Cameroon, L. (2020). Human Rights and Cultural Practices: An Ethical Perspective. International Journal of Human Rights, 24(8), 1002-1021.
  • Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural Moralities: A Defense of Pluralism and Relativism. Oxford University Press.
  • Zwart, S. (2019). Critical Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Moral Judgment. Ethics & Social Philosophy, 22(1), 68-85.

Related Assignments