What Is Political Globalization And What Are Some Main Argum
What Is Political Globalization What Are Some Main Argument About
What is political globalization? What are some main arguments about political globalization and the role of states? Please, also discuss the debate between hyperglobalizers and globalization skeptics. 2. What is the Westphalian System and how has the emergence of the United Nations transformed that system? Please, explain. Answers must come from the books: Steger, Manfred B. 2013, 3rd ed. Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press. ISBN-. Snarr, Michael T., and D. Neil Snarr. 2012, 5th ed. Introducing Global Issues. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. ISBN: . You must provide in-text citations with page numbers. No quotations. While I encourage you to bring in knowledge from other classes, outside readings and personal experiences, you are required to use the class textbook(s) as primary source(s) of information for your responses/replies. Your responses should be substantive and demonstrate critical thinking about the assigned subject matter. You are not allowed to use quotations. Use paraphrasing instead and make sure to provide in-text citations, which should include the last name of the author(s), year of publication, and page number(s). You are required to provide in-text citations and references in the APA writing format in all discussions.
Paper For Above instruction
Political globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness and interdependence of states and societies around the world through political institutions, processes, and norms. It encompasses the expansion of international and transnational organizations, global governance, and the dissemination of political ideas beyond national borders (Steger, 2013, p. 4). The central role of the state remains significant, but the nature of sovereignty and power is evolving as global institutions gain authority. The debate between hyperglobalizers and globalization skeptics centers on whether globalization has truly diminished the importance of nation-states or if they maintain significant control amidst shifting dynamics. Hyperglobalizers argue that globalization leads to the decline of state sovereignty, emphasizing economic integration and the rise of supranational entities, which undermine traditional national authority (Snarr & Snarr, 2012, p. 134). Conversely, skeptics believe that states continue to be essential actors and that globalization is overstated, particularly when considering continued national autonomy and localized resistance (Steger, 2013, p. 58). The role of states is also being reconceptualized in the context of transnational networks, which challenge the traditional Westphalian sovereignty framework—an international system established through the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, which emphasized the territorial integrity and sovereignty of nation-states (Snarr & Snarr, 2012, p. 45). The emergence of the United Nations after World War II significantly transformed this system by creating a global governing body designed to facilitate international cooperation, peacekeeping, and promote human rights. Unlike the Westphalian system, which prioritized sovereignty and territoriality, the UN introduced mechanisms for collective security and multilateral diplomacy, albeit within the limits of state sovereignty (Steger, 2013, pp. 103-105). This shift reflects an evolving international order where sovereignty remains crucial but is increasingly mediated by global institutions that aim to address transnational issues such as peace, security, and human rights. Overall, political globalization underscores a complex interplay between national sovereignty and global governance, with ongoing debates about the future role of states in a highly interconnected world.
References
- Steger, M. B. (2013). Globalization: A very short introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Snarr, M. T., & Snarr, D. N. (2012). Introducing global issues (5th ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.