What's Miss Emily's Problem? This Weird Story Seems Lik ✓ Solved

What's Miss Emily's problem? This weird story seems lik

What's Miss Emily's problem? For your initial post, analyze Emily Grierson psychologically. Why does she kill Homer and then apparently keep sleeping with his body for all those years? Why does she not admit at first that her father is dead? Can you connect these incidents? Make a convincing argument that your diagnosis of her psychological problems is correct.

Paper For Above Instructions

In William Faulkner’s short story “A Rose for Emily,” the character of Emily Grierson serves as a complex study of psychological turmoil intertwined with societal expectations and personal traumas. This analysis aims to delve into the psychological aspects of Emily's character, focusing on the prominent issues that lead to her isolation, the murder of Homer Barron, and her inability to accept her father's death. Through this exploration, one can gain insight into what may be termed a severe psychological condition characterized by repression, delusion, and a longing for control.

Isolation and Repression

From the onset, Emily Grierson is portrayed as an isolated figure. Her father’s overbearing influence and her subsequent loneliness after his death play crucial roles in her psychological decline. According to psychoanalytic theory, this type of isolation can lead to pathological attachment and the repression of emotions (Freud, 1917). Emily’s father denies her the opportunity to form healthy relationships, particularly with male figures, making her reliant on his authority and ultimately creating barriers to her emotional development.

When her father dies, Emily’s refusal to acknowledge his death can be interpreted as a refusal to confront reality and a disruption of her psychological balance. This denial is a classic defense mechanism symptomatic of grief (Kübler-Ross, 1969). The inability to accept such a significant loss may be indicative of her psychological fragility and fear of abandonment—emotions deeply rooted from her formative years spent under her father’s oppressive shadow.

The Murder of Homer Barron

The act of killing Homer Barron represents another layer in Emily’s troubled psyche. The reasons behind this drastic action can be analyzed through the lens of control and the need for permanence. Emily's relationship with Homer, who is portrayed as a modern man compared to her traditional upbringing, temporarily introduces her to the possibility of love and companionship. However, as Homer makes choices that could lead him away from her, Emily's intense fear of abandonment resurfaces. The preeminent drive to maintain control over her life and relationships leads her to commit murder—a desperate act to prevent loss (Psychoanalytic theory explains that such extreme behaviors often stem from unresolved traumas and overwhelming feelings of insecurity).

After the murder, the continued presence of Homer’s body in her home could suggest a twisted sense of intimacy, highlighting Emily's deep-seated psychological issues and her inability to let go of those she loves. This act can be viewed not only as a physical keeping of her love but also as an attempt to master her fear of loneliness. By holding onto Homer, she secures a semblance of companionship, even if it is morbidly unhealthy.

The Madness and Societal Expectations

Emily's behavior can also be contextualized within the societal expectations of women during the post-Civil War South, which can lead to repression of individuality and desires (Morrison, 1992). The societal judgment and disdain for her actions further isolate her, as gossip about Emily's eccentricities circulate around town. This propels her deeper into her cocoon of denial and psychological unraveling. Moreover, the gossip exacerbates her madness, as she feels the need to adhere to societal norms yet simultaneously rebels against them in a bid for autonomy.

By examining the dichotomy between societal expectations and her individual desires, it becomes clear that Emily's madness is a reaction to the restrictions placed upon her, which fuels both her psychological decay and her unfathomable actions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Emily Grierson's character in Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily” serves as a manifestation of the complexities surrounding grief, isolation, and societal pressures. Her tragic story unveils a psyche marred by real and perceived losses, fear of abandonment, and an overwhelming desire for control over her life and relationships. To diagnose Emily's psychological issues, one can conclude that they stem from a volatile mixture of unresolved grief and denial, coupled with societal restrictions that fostered her madness. Understanding Emily through this psychological lens not only highlights her tragic end but also reflects the broader implications of individual struggles against societal constraints.

References

• Freud, S. (1917). Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
• Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death and Dying. New York: Scribner.
• Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. New York: Vintage.
• Faulkner, W. (1930). A Rose for Emily. In Collectio> n of Short Stories. New York: Vintage.
• Rosenblatt, P. C., & Walsh, R. P. (1989). Family and the Psychology of Grief. In The Handbook of Grief Therapy. New York: Routledge.
• Meissner, W. W. (2002). Psychoanalytic Therapy: A Practitioner's Guide. New York: Other Press.
• Boyle, A. (2001). The Relation of Grief and Trauma to Health. The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine.
• Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
• Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and Development: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study from Birth to Adulthood. Attachment & Human Development.
• Glick, J. (2006). The Psychoanalytic Perspective on Misunderstandings in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross’ Stages of Grief. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association.