What Teachers Should Know And Be Able To Do Read The Two Sec
What Teachers Should Know And Be Able To Doread The Two Sections Prop
What Teachers Should Know and Be Able To Do Read the two sections (Proposition 4 and Proposition 5) from the NBPT online pdf, What Teachers Should Know and Be Able To Do Links to an external site. . This is a discussion question assessment. Remember to respond to at least one other student’s submission for full credit. After reading, answer the discussion questions: How does Proposition 4 connect to teachers participating in action research? How does Proposition 5 connect to teachers participating in action research?
Paper For Above instruction
The purpose of this paper is to analyze and interpret how Proposition 4 and Proposition 5 from the NBPT (National Board for Professional Teaching Standards) document relate to teachers engaging in action research. Action research is a reflective practice whereby teachers systematically investigate their own teaching methods and student outcomes to improve educational effectiveness. Understanding these propositions in relation to action research can enhance professional development and instructional strategies.
Proposition 4 emphasizes the importance of teachers’ knowledge of students' development, learning processes, and needs. It asserts that effective teachers understand diverse student backgrounds and tailor their instruction accordingly. This proposition aligns closely with action research, as teachers practicing action research identify specific student needs, diagnose challenges, and implement targeted interventions. Through this process, teachers generate data about their students’ progress, which informs subsequent teaching practices. Thus, Proposition 4 encourages teachers to conduct ongoing assessments and reflections, core components of action research, fostering continuous improvement and responsiveness to student diversity.
Similarly, Proposition 5 highlights teachers’ ability to plan instruction based on their understanding of content, students, and instructional strategies. It stresses the importance of designing engaging, meaningful learning experiences that accommodate individual student differences. When teachers engage in action research, they critically analyze the effectiveness of their lesson plans and instructional techniques. They collect evidence about what works and what does not, then refine their approach accordingly. Both Proposition 5 and action research emphasize a cycle of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting, which promotes professional growth and enhances instructional quality.
Implementing action research grounded in these propositions offers multiple benefits. It promotes reflective practice, empowers teachers to make data-driven decisions, and fosters a culture of continuous learning. Teachers adopting this approach can develop more culturally responsive and effective instructional strategies, ultimately leading to improved student outcomes. Furthermore, this approach aligns with the principles of professional autonomy and accountability ingrained in Proposition 4 and Proposition 5.
In conclusion, Proposition 4 and Proposition 5 support the core philosophy of action research by emphasizing the importance of understanding students and planning instruction accordingly. These propositions provide a professional framework that encourages teachers to be reflective practitioners committed to ongoing professional growth. By integrating these propositions into their practice, teachers can effectively utilize action research to address diverse student needs and enhance their instructional effectiveness, contributing to higher levels of student achievement and engagement.
References
American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for Reporting on Empirical Research Studies. AERA.
Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research. Sage publications.
Mertler, C. A. (2016). Introduction to educational research. SAGE Publications.
Hines, P. (2007). Action research as a tool for professional development. Educational Action Research, 15(4), 415-429.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Larsen, A. A., & Ryan, J. (2015). Engaged scholarship in action research. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 433-452.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559-604). SAGE Publications.
Stringer, E. T., & Christenson, J. (2018). Action research in education. Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.