Which Of The Four Cost Types, If Reduced Through Blockchain ✓ Solved

Which of the four cost types, if reduced through blockchain tec

In chapter 4 of "Blockchain Revolution" by Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott, the authors discuss four types of costs that blockchain technology can significantly reduce: transaction costs, verification costs, infrastructure costs, and trust costs. These costs are crucial for organizations to understand, especially in the rapidly evolving business landscape impacted by digital technologies. This paper will explore which of the four cost types, if reduced through blockchain technology, would most impact the organization I currently work for, analyze the most visible impact on my job role, and suggest strategies to minimize any negative impacts associated with these changes.

Impact of Blockchain on Transaction Costs

Within my organization, the most pertinent cost type that blockchain technology could reduce is transaction costs. Transaction costs encompass all expenses associated with the exchange of goods or services, including negotiations, contracts, and payment processing. In sectors like banking, supply chain, and real estate, transaction costs can be particularly substantial due to intermediaries such as banks, brokers, and other third-party services. By implementing blockchain technology, these intermediaries can often be eliminated or their roles simplified, leading to increased efficiency and cost savings.

The implications of reduced transaction costs would be particularly significant in my current job role, where I handle operations related to procurement and supply chain management. Traditionally, procurement processes involve considerable overhead due to extensive documentation, multiple point approvals, and the involvement of third-party verification services. With blockchain, a decentralized system can provide a transparent and immutable record of all transactions, reducing the time and resources needed to manage these processes.

Visible Impact on My Job Role

The most visible impact of reduced transaction costs on my job role would likely manifest in two key areas: efficiency and accountability. With fewer transaction-related tasks to manage, I would have more bandwidth to focus on strategic initiatives that drive value for the company. This could involve supplier relationship management, exploring new procurement strategies, and enhancing overall operational efficiency.

Moreover, accountability and transparency would increase within the procurement process. Blockchain technology allows for real-time tracking of transactions, providing a clear audit trail. This improvement would not only minimize disputes with suppliers but also reinforce trust in procurement processes within my organization.

Minimizing Negative Impacts

While the advantages of blockchain technology in reducing transaction costs are evident, there are potential negative impacts that need to be addressed. Primarily, the introduction of blockchain could lead to job displacements, particularly for roles that are heavily reliant on manual transaction processing. To minimize these negative impacts, it is essential to embrace a proactive approach that focuses on reskilling and upskilling. Instead of viewing blockchain as a threat, my organization could foster a culture of continuous learning, encouraging employees to gain expertise in blockchain technology and its applications in our field.

This strategy could involve providing training sessions on blockchain concepts, offering online courses to improve digital literacy, and promoting knowledge sharing among team members. By doing so, the workforce can adapt to the new technological landscape instead of becoming obsolete. Additionally, by encouraging employees to engage with blockchain technology, my organization can innovate and develop new processes that leverage its benefits.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the implementation of blockchain technology holds significant potential for reducing transaction costs in my organization, which would subsequently impact my role in procurement and supply chain management. The increased efficiency and accountability resulting from this reduction would allow me to contribute more strategically to the organization. However, addressing potential negative impacts through proactive reskilling and fostering a culture of learning is vital to ensure that all employees can benefit from the transformation brought about by blockchain technology. By embracing these changes, my organization can position itself at the forefront of innovation while also safeguarding the interests of its employees.

References

• Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.
• Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some Simple Economics of the Blockchain. Working Paper.
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Bitcoin.org.
• Tapscott, D. (2018). Blockchain Research Institute. Retrieved from https://www.blockchainresearchinstitute.org
• Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 5-21.
• Kiviat, T. I. (2015). Blockchain Privacy. Georgia State University Law Review, 32, 1-25.
• Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292-2303.
• Zhang, P., Schmidt, D. C., & Huhns, M. N. (2019). Blockchain Technology Use Cases in the Healthcare Domain: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 7, 167579-167596.
• Yaga, D., Mell, P., Roby, N., & Scarfone, K. (2018). Blockchain Technology Overview. NIST Special Publication.
• Furlonger, D., & Whitmore, A. (2018). Predicts 2019: Blockchain Will Become a Larger Part of Financial Services. Gartner Research.