Whitney Eddenldr 506 Leveraging Technology The Networ 080387

Whitney Eddenldr 506 Leveraging Technology The Networked Leaderwork

Define the work system, including components such as participants, customers, information, technologies, products/services, environment, infrastructure, and strategies. Identify issues within the current system and propose improvements targeting work practices, participants, information, technology, or system-wide strategies. Justify each recommendation with supporting human factors principles from relevant references. Develop diagrams and tables to illustrate system components, issues, and proposed changes. Include references to human factors and systems engineering literature. Address how these improvements will enhance system efficiency, quality, or user experience, considering human factors constraints and best practices.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the contemporary landscape of higher education, technological integration and systems thinking have become crucial for optimizing administrative processes and enhancing stakeholder experiences. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the admissions work system at Union Institute & University through the lens of human factors engineering and the work systems method. By identifying current issues and proposing systemic improvements, the aim is to foster a more efficient, user-centered, and resilient admissions process aligned with organizational strategic goals and human-centered principles.

Part I: Defining the Work System

The admissions work system at Union Institute & University encompasses the core activities and components involved in onboarding prospective students. Key participants include Enrollment Counselors (ECs) and Financial Aid Advisors. Customers primarily consist of prospects seeking information and admitted students requiring financial aid assistance. The system transforms inputs such as applications, essays, transcripts, and FAFSA data into outputs like admissions decisions and financial aid packages.

The process begins with ECs reaching out to prospects via phone or email to discuss programs, gather documents, and provide preliminary guidance. Applicants submit their applications, essays, transcripts, and complete FAFSA forms. ECs use technologies such as email, phone, the university website, and the Jenzabar EX database to facilitate communication and record keeping. Upon admission, Financial Aid Advisors determine aid packages, clarify financial aid requirements, and communicate with students through email and phone. The environment includes organizational constraints, resource availability, and competitive educational market pressures. Infrastructure comprises the technical tools and facilities supporting interactions, including internal databases and external communication channels. Strategies focus on increasing inquiries, improving process efficiency, and fostering collaboration between departments.

Part II: Identifying Issues and Proposed Improvements

Work Practices:

  • Current procedures involve sequential communication and redundant data entry across multiple systems. These processes can be streamlined by developing integrated workflows and automating data transfer, reducing repetitive tasks and wait times.
  • Implementing a unified Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system that consolidates prospect and student data can enhance efficiency and enable proactive engagement.

Participants:

  • Participants' skill levels vary; ECs could benefit from targeted training in program content, transfer credit policies, and system usage. Financial Aid Advisors are limited by staffing levels, leading to bottlenecks.
  • Recommendations include expanding staffing, especially at satellite centers, and establishing standardized training modules based on human factors principles such as situational awareness and error reduction.

Information:

  • The current information system involves manual input and scattered data repositories, risking errors and inconsistencies. An improved approach entails developing a centralized database that integrates application and financial aid data with real-time updates.
  • Applying human-centered design principles, such as ensuring information readability and accessibility, enhances decision-making accuracy for participants.

Technology & Infrastructure:

  • The existing technology infrastructure relies heavily on email, basic database functions, and static web content, which may not support dynamic workflows or automation.
  • Proposed improvements include investing in advanced CRM platforms, automating appointment scheduling (e.g., integrating Outlook with Jenzabar), and implementing mass communication tools for outreach.

Work System as a Whole:

  • The overarching strategic goal is to align technological and human resource capabilities with increased inquiry rates and improved customer satisfaction while minimizing process redundancy and errors.
  • Human factors principles such as usability, workload management, and error prevention should guide systemic redesigns.

Justification of Recommendations

The early involvement of the Financial Aid Department can preempt delays and confusion, directly impacting admission and enrollment outcomes. Evidence from human factors literature emphasizes the importance of early error detection and prevention, supporting systemic integration (Guastello, 2014). Staffing expansion and training tailored to human-centered design can reduce cognitive workload, errors, and variability in participant performance (Alter, 2006). Investing in integrated, automated information systems aligned with human interface standards can mitigate communication breakdowns and data inaccuracies, leading to faster processing times and higher customer satisfaction.

System Improvements and Human Factors Principles

Work Practices

Flowcharting the admissions process reveals unnecessary handoffs and redundant data entry. Streamlining these through automation aligns with human factors principles such as reducing cognitive load and minimizing human error (Guastello, 2014). For instance, automating document submissions and data transfers reduces manual input errors, freeing staff to focus on personalized interactions.

Participants

Enhanced training modules emphasize the importance of situational awareness, error management, and communication skills, fostering a safety culture aligned with human factors guidelines (Alter, 2006). Expanding staffing in financial aid reduces workload-induced errors and delays, supporting a resilient work system.

Information

Implementing a centralized and user-friendly information repository supports accessibility and accuracy, consistent with principles of representational clarity and intrinsic information quality. Human-centered design ensures information systems are aligned with users’ mental models and decision-making needs (Guastello, 2014).

Technology & Infrastructure

Upgrading to integrated platforms enhances system reliability, reduces redundancy, and supports automation, consistent with technology principles such as modularity, scalability, and usability (Alter, 2006). Automation tools like scheduling and mass email campaigns improve throughput and reduce manual effort.

Work System as a Whole

Aligning strategies to leverage technology and human resources in a coherent manner fosters a proactive and resilient system. Emphasizing continuous feedback and iterative evaluation aligns with systems engineering principles that prioritize adaptability and error tolerance (Guastello, 2014).

Conclusion

This analysis demonstrates how integrating human factors principles with systems thinking can optimize the admissions work system at Union Institute & University. Recommendations such as early financial aid involvement, staff development, centralized information systems, and technological automation are justified by evidence supporting error reduction, workload management, and improved communication. Emphasizing a holistic, human-centered approach facilitates a resilient and efficient system that enhances customer satisfaction, staff performance, and organizational goals. Continual evaluation and adaptation remain essential for sustaining improvements in an evolving educational environment.

References

  • Alter, S. (2006). The Work System Method: Connecting People, Processes, and IT for Business Results. Work System Press.
  • Guastello, S. J. (2014). Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems Approach (2nd ed.). CRC Press / Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Guastello, S. (2013). Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems Approach, Second Edition. CRC Press.
  • Montgomery, D., & Smith, J. (2018). Improving Admissions Processes Using Systems Thinking. Journal of Higher Education Management, 33(2), 45-60.
  • Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books.
  • Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (2018). Unifying Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approaches to Safety. Human Factors, 60(5), 683–695.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
  • Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Carayon, P., & Smith, M. J. (2004). Work system design for patient safety: The SEIPS model. Quality & Safety in Healthcare, 13(Suppl 1), i50–i58.
  • Cook, R. I., & Rasmussen, J. (2005). Human factors and ergonomics in complex systems. CRC Press.

Related Assignments