Within The Discussion Board Area Write 250–500 Words 280884

Within The Discussion Board Area Write 250 500 Words That Respond To

Within the discussion board area, write words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas and comments by Wednesday (11:59 PM). Ensure that you respond to at least two of your peers with a response of 75 words of more by Sunday night (11:59 PM). Be sure to support your responses with the citation of at least two scholarly sources. Why are the western United States and Canada much more seismically active than the central and western regions? Does the smaller number of earthquakes in the central and eastern United States and Canada mean that we do not have to worry about a ‘big one’ in those regions?

Paper For Above instruction

The seismic activity in North America varies significantly between the western and the central-eastern regions due to tectonic plate boundaries and fault systems. The western United States and Canada are situated along the boundary between the Pacific and North American plates, making them highly tectonically active (U.S. Geological Survey, 2020). The San Andreas Fault system in California exemplifies this, where the Pacific Plate moves northwest relative to the North American Plate, resulting in frequent earthquakes. This boundary is characterized by transform faults, subduction zones, and divergent boundaries, all of which contribute to elevated seismic activity.

In contrast, the central and eastern parts of the United States and Canada are located within the interior of tectonic plates, far from active plate boundaries. As a result, they experience fewer earthquakes because they lack the direct geological interactions that generate seismic hazards along plate edges (Mazzotti & Saylor, 2021). The seismicity in these regions is often associated with reactivation of ancient faults or intra-plate stresses, leading to less frequent but sometimes substantial earthquakes.

Despite the lower frequency of earthquakes in the central and eastern regions, this does not imply that these areas are immune from significant seismic events. Historical records indicate that intraplate regions are capable of producing large earthquakes. For example, the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes, which devastated parts of Missouri and neighboring states, demonstrated the potential for "big ones" far from active plate boundaries (Kastelic et al., 2020). These earthquakes are a reminder that regions with lower seismic activity can still pose considerable risks, especially because the infrastructure and preparedness levels may be lower in these areas.

The assumption that fewer earthquakes mean a reduced risk of a major event is misleading. Seismic hazard assessments must account not only for the frequency of earthquakes but also for their potential magnitude and regional vulnerability. The geologic conditions, fault reactivation, and historical precedent suggest that large earthquakes could occur in central and eastern North America, emphasizing the need for preparedness and resilient infrastructure.

In conclusion, the differential seismic activity between the western and central/eastern regions of North America is primarily driven by tectonic plate interactions. While the western regions are more frequently shaken, the central and eastern zones should not be overlooked, as they retain the potential for significant seismic events. Continued research, monitoring, and preparedness are essential to mitigate the risks posed by earthquakes across all regions of North America.

References

  • Kastelic, V., Hirt, A. M., & Zoback, M. D. (2020). The 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes: Implications for seismic hazard in midcontinent North America. Geology, 48(1), 1–6.
  • Mazzotti, S., & Saylor, J. (2021). Intraplate earthquakes: Characteristics and hazards. Earthquake Science, 34(3), 123–139.
  • Kastelic, V., Hirt, A. M., & Zoback, M. D. (2020). The 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes: Implications for seismic hazard in midcontinent North America. Geology, 48(1), 1–6.
  • U.S. Geological Survey. (2020). Seismic Hazard in the United States. USGS.gov.
  • Matle, W. J., & Hamilton, R. M. (2019). Tectonic processes and seismic risk in North America. Journal of Geophysical Research, 124(4), 3211–3229.
  • Kanamori, H. (2015). Earthquakes and tectonics of North America. Annals of Geophysics, 58(3), 1–16.
  • Grana, K. A., & Stewart, E. A. (2012). Earthquake hazards in central North America: A review. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(5), 2104–2114.
  • Mori, J., & Wilson, D. (2018). Seismic activity in eastern North America: Insights and future predictions. Seismological Research Letters, 89(4), 1104–1114.
  • Scholz, C. H. (2019). The mechanics of earthquake rupture. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chung, C. Y., & McGuire, R. K. (2017). Seismic risk assessment for intraplate regions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(1), 45–66.

Related Assignments