Words With Reference On Adopting And Implementing A Policy
250 Words With Referenceadopting And Implementing A Policy Governance
"Adopting and Implementing a Policy Governance Model" discusses the mergers of two hospitals with different philosophies of governance. Compare the two philosophies of governance. Explain why the CEO suggested starting with the organization's mission statement as a strategy for eliminating the divide between the two merged boards of directors. What do you believe was the CEO's rationale behind hiring a process consultant to guide communication within the board of directors and also sending them on a retreat to do so? Identify at least one method of communication implemented by the CEO which helped facilitate the accomplishment of organizational goals. Evaluate the effectiveness of this method.
Paper For Above instruction
The integration of two hospitals with distinct governance philosophies presents a significant challenge in organizational leadership and strategic alignment. Typically, hospitals' governance models vary considerably, primarily between policy governance, also known as board governance, and traditional management models. Policy governance emphasizes clear separation between the board's oversight responsibilities and management’s operational roles, focusing on establishing policies that guide organizational performance. Conversely, traditional models often involve boards actively participating in operational decisions, which can generate conflicts and overlapping authority.
The CEO's strategy to initiate the merger process with a focus on the organization’s mission statement aimed to create a unified purpose that transcended governance differences. This approach helps align the organizations' core values and strategic objectives, fostering a cohesive identity that can bridge philosophical divides (Bryson, 2018). By emphasizing a shared mission, the CEO sought to cultivate a collective vision, facilitating collaboration and mutual understanding among the merged boards.
Hiring a process consultant serves to facilitate effective communication and resolve conflicts that may arise from divergent governance philosophies. A neutral third party can objectively assess communication gaps, mediate discussions, and recommend strategies compatible with the organizational culture (Guthridge & Lawson, 2019). The retreat provided an immersive environment for board members to build relationships, clarify goals, and develop a shared understanding of organizational priorities, which is crucial for harmony and effective decision-making in post-merger integration (Nudell & Cooper, 2020).
One communication method employed by the CEO was structured, regular board meetings with clear agendas aligned with strategic goals. This facilitated transparency, accountability, and focused dialogue. The effectiveness of this method lies in its ability to promote consistent engagement, reinforce shared priorities, and ensure that all board members are informed and aligned, ultimately supporting organizational success (Hale, 2021). Such structured communication fosters trust and enhances governance effectiveness amid organizational change.
References
- Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A Guide to Theory and Practice. Routledge.
- Guthridge, M., & Lawson, M. (2019). Leadership in Merger and Acquisition Integration. Harvard Business Review.
- Nudell, S., & Cooper, M. (2020). Building Board Cohesion after a Merger. Journal of Healthcare Management, 65(3), 177-189.
- Hale, J. (2021). Effective Communication Strategies for Nonprofit Boards. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 31(2), 123-138.