Workplace Ethics: This Assignment Will Give You The Opportun ✓ Solved

Workplace Ethics This assignment will give you the opportunity

This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose an article and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events that are described. Read and reflect on the following article. Please read the article. Click The article toy maker below to read Toy Maker. Write a paper in which you: Analyze the following questions associated with your chosen article, and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course. What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake? Have any moral rights been violated? What would a Utilitarian recommend? What would a Kantian recommend? Explain your rationale for each of your answers for your chosen article, with supporting evidence.

Paper For Above Instructions

Workplace ethics play a significant role in shaping the culture and operation within any organization. They form the foundation for decision-making processes and define how employees and employers interact in a professional environment. In this paper, I will analyze the ethical implications and impacts of an article about a toy maker, examining the ideals, effects, and potential violations of moral rights, as well as recommendations from a Utilitarian and Kantian perspective.

For this analysis, I chose the article about the toy maker, which sheds light on various ethical challenges faced by businesses in the manufacturing sector. Specifically, it discusses the ethical dilemmas related to labor practices, environmental sustainability, and consumer safety.

Ideals, Effects, and Consequences at Stake

The ideals at stake in the toy maker's situation include integrity, social responsibility, and compassion towards both workers and consumers. The implications of compromising these ideals can be profound. For instance, if the toy maker prioritizes profits over ethical manufacturing practices, this can lead to harmful environmental effects and violations of workers' rights. Such decisions can degrade consumer trust and damage the company's reputation in the long run.

Furthermore, the consequences of prioritizing profit over ethical considerations might also have repercussions on the broader community and the environment. The toy maker’s choice to source materials from suppliers who do not adhere to ethical labor practices can perpetuate cycles of exploitation. Consumers, upon discovering these unethical practices, may choose to boycott the products, thereby affecting sales and the company's viability in the market.

Moral Rights Violations

Within the context of workplace ethics, moral rights pertain to the fundamental entitlements of individuals that must not be infringed upon. In the case of the toy maker, there may indeed be instances where moral rights have been violated. For example, if the workers are subjected to unsafe working conditions or are paid below the minimum wage, their rights are being violated. Child labor could be another significant concern; should any child labor be used in the production processes, it would represent a profound moral breach.

This scenario necessitates a rigorous examination of labor practices and the treatment of all employees involved in the production chain. Maintaining ethical standards is not just a legal obligation—it is a moral imperative that upholds the dignity and rights of all individuals involved.

Utilitarian Recommendations

From a Utilitarian perspective, which advocates for the greatest good for the greatest number, the recommendations for the toy maker would focus on evaluating the overall consequences of business decisions. A Utilitarian would likely recommend that the company adopt ethical labor practices and environmentally sustainable methods to ensure a positive impact on the largest number of stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the community.

For example, investing in fair labor practices may initially increase operating costs; however, the long-term benefits of enhancing worker satisfaction, reducing turnover rates, and fostering consumer loyalty can lead to greater business sustainability. Such steps are deemed favorable under a Utilitarian framework as they promote overall welfare and minimize harm.

Kantian Recommendations

In contrast, a Kantian perspective emphasizes duty and moral imperatives over the consequences of actions. A Kantian would argue that the toy maker should follow ethical guidelines because it is the right thing to do, regardless of potential profit or loss. This philosophy stresses respect for individuals as ends in themselves, rather than as mere means to an end. Therefore, a Kantian would advocate for humane labor practices, ensuring that workers are treated with dignity and respect.

This approach would reject any business strategy that involves exploiting workers or deceiving consumers, as these actions undermine the inherent worth of individuals. Instead, the toy maker should focus on forming honest and responsible relationships with suppliers, workers, and customers, while adhering to commitments to ethical practices at every level of production.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the analysis of the toy maker's ethical dilemmas reveals significant implications regarding workplace ethics. Protecting moral rights, understanding the effects of business decisions, and adopting recommendations from both Utilitarian and Kantian perspectives is essential. Ethical practices not only uphold the moral fabric of society but also contribute to the long-term success and sustainability of businesses.

By prioritizing ethical considerations, the toy maker can foster an environment of trust, accountability, and respect for all stakeholders involved, ensuring that the company thrives while adhering to its moral responsibilities.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice Hall.
• Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2014). Business & Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management. Cengage Learning.
• Ferrell, O. C., & Fraedrich, J. (2015). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Yale Law Journal.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism.
• Schwartz, M. S. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly.
• Velasquez, M. G. (2011). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Pearson.
• Wines, W. A. (2011). Business Ethics: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Young, S. D. (2013). The Ethics of Business: A Guide for Success. Business Expert Press.