Write A 350 To 700 Word Journal Entry In Narrative Style

Writea 350 To 700 Word Journal Entry In The Narrative Styledescribet

Write a 350- to 700-word journal entry in the narrative style. Describe the flow of information in your company, or in a company at which you have been employed. In your journal, discuss the following: The intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, organizational, and intercultural levels of communication within your company. How information travels up, down, and across your organization, and how it relates to the basic communications model. The functions of the Y hierarchy of managerial communications. Does it apply to your organization's communication hierarchy? A comparison of at least three managerial communication approaches you have observed in your organization. At least three potential barriers to effective communications that exist in your company.

Paper For Above instruction

During my tenure at a mid-sized technology firm, I observed a complex yet intriguing flow of information that exemplified various levels of communication within an organizational structure. From the intrapersonal level, employees frequently engaged in self-reflection concerning their roles and responsibilities, which influenced their subsequent interactions with colleagues. This internal dialogue often determined how effectively they conveyed ideas and responded to organizational demands.

At the interpersonal level, communication was predominantly face-to-face, especially during project meetings and casual interactions. These exchanges relied heavily on non-verbal cues and active listening to ensure clarity and alignment. For instance, team members often used open-ended questions to foster understanding, which promoted a collaborative environment. This level served as the foundation for group dynamics, where collective problem-solving and decision-making took place within project teams.

Group interactions, primarily within project teams, were critical in advancing organizational goals. These groups employed both formal and informal communication channels. Formal channels included scheduled meetings, memos, and email updates, while informal channels encompassed instant messaging and quick conversations, facilitating rapid decision-making. Such exchanges were essential for coordination, sharing expertise, and ensuring alignment across functions.

The organizational level of communication was exemplified in structured reports, strategic briefings, and top-down directives. Leadership utilized hierarchical channels to disseminate information from executive management down to operational staff. Conversely, feedback mechanisms allowed insights from lower levels to reach upper management, promoting organizational learning. Intercultural communication was also prominent, given the diverse workforce. Awareness of cultural differences was vital to prevent misunderstandings and foster inclusivity, especially during international collaborations and multicultural team interactions.

Information generally traveled within the organization in three directions—upward, downward, and laterally—aligning with the basic communication model. Upward communication, such as progress reports and feedback, enabled employees to inform management about operational realities. Downward communication included policies, strategic goals, and instructions from supervisors to subordinates. Horizontal communication among peers facilitated coordination and conflict resolution. An example of this flow was during quarterly planning sessions where directives from executives were communicated downward, while employee feedback was communicated upward through surveys and meetings.

The Y hierarchy of managerial communications, which emphasizes the importance of both command and feedback, aligns partly with the communication practices observed. Managers frequently issued directives but also sought input from team members to improve processes. However, in my organization, the function of feedback was often ad hoc rather than continuous, suggesting partial applicability of the Y model.

In comparing managerial communication approaches, three were notably prevalent. Firstly, authoritative communication, typically seen in top-down directives from senior managers, often led to quick decision-making but sometimes suppressed subordinate input. Secondly, participative communication was encouraged in team meetings, fostering engagement and shared decision-making. Thirdly, directive communication was used during project crises, where rapid, clear instructions were necessary to mitigate risk.

Despite these effective practices, barriers to communication persisted. One significant barrier was technological - especially inconsistent remote connectivity, which hampered real-time interactions. A second barrier was cultural differences; misinterpretations arose from diverse communication styles and language barriers. Lastly, hierarchical rigidity sometimes impeded open dialogue, with employees feeling reluctant to voice concerns upward.

In sum, understanding the nuanced flow of information within organizations reveals the intricate interplay between different communication levels and approaches. Recognizing barriers and evaluating the applicability of models like the Y hierarchy can guide the development of more effective communication strategies, ultimately enhancing organizational performance.

References

• Tourish, D., & Robson, P. (2006). Findings from Middle Managers’ E-mail Diaries. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 881-906.
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 13, 127-149.
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
• Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled interpersonal communication: Research, theory and practice. Routledge.
• Robinson, S. L., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson.
• Shockley-Zalabak, P. S. (2015). Fundamentals of organizational communication: Philosophical foundations and practices. Pearson.
• Mani, S., & Muralidharan, R. (2019). Intercultural communication in organizations. Routledge.
• Cheney, G., & Romano, N. C. (1998). The organizational communication challenge: Toward a new paradigm. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(3), 251-270.
• McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
• Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row.