Write A 68-Page Report In Which You Complete The Following

Write A 68 Page Report In Which You Complete The Followin

Write a 6–8 page report in which you complete the following: Brainstorm several alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma in the case. Analyze alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma and come to a conclusion. Analyze and document the possible ramifications for at least three alternatives. Then, choose a course of action. Apply ethical codes and standards to support the plan of action.

Explain the research methods used in multiple research studies relevant to the case, and present the findings. Explain your course of action, using research findings from at least two studies to support your plan. You can use (but are not required to use) additional research beyond the two studies to support your plan. The following is the recommended structure for organizing your assessment: Create a title page: Write a title that reflects the purpose of your work. It is suggested that you use the APA Paper Template [DOCX] to format your paper according to the APA manual (current edition).

Write an introduction: For the introduction section of your paper, include the title at the top of the first page. (In APA format, the word Introduction is not used as a heading.) Briefly summarize: The ethical issue in the case you have chosen. How professional standards and other resources, in general terms, point toward solutions. How the issue in general relates to larger societal problems. Create a heading titled Applied Ethical Principles and Standards : Use the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct to assess which of the principles and standards relate to the particular ethical issue in this case, and analyze how they do so. Create a heading titled Alternative Solutions : Brainstorm several alternatives for resolving the ethical dilemma in the case.

Thoroughly analyze the possible ramifications for at least three alternatives and document them. Then, choose a course of action. Explain your chosen course of action and support it based on both ethical principles and current psychological research (published within the past decade). Create a heading title Research: Present at least two research studies that support your thinking and approach to ethics in the case. Present the research methods and findings and analyze the relevance of the findings to the case.

Create a heading titled Conclusion : Briefly summarize the importance of the problem and make a compelling appeal for implementation of your action plan. Keep in mind that while your writing must conform to APA standards, you must explain all information in a manner that can be understood easily by a nonacademic or nonscientific audience. Refer to the Ethical Issue and Action Plan Scoring Guide to ensure you meet the grading criteria for this assessment. Additional Requirements Your assessment should meet the following requirements: Written communication: Written communication is well organized and free from errors that detract from the overall message. APA style: Comply with current APA style and formatting.

Paper For Above instruction

The case of Hannah Kennard and Adara Watson presents a complex ethical dilemma rooted in cultural sensitivity, confidentiality, and the duties of a school counselor. Hannah, a dedicated high school counselor, faces the challenge of balancing her commitment to her client’s well-being with respecting family privacy and cultural considerations. Adara, a 15-year-old Muslim-American student, confides in Hannah about her depression, feelings of social alienation, bullying, and thoughts of death. Her reluctance to seek therapy, her parents' disapproval, and her feelings of betrayal after her parents are told about her disclosures compound the ethical challenges faced by Hannah. This paper examines potential solutions, analyzes their ramifications, and advocates for an ethically sound course of action supported by current research and professional standards.

Introduction

The ethical dilemma in this case revolves around Hannah’s decision to inform Adara’s parents about her suicidal ideation without explicit consent, raising concerns about confidentiality, autonomy, and beneficence. Professional standards outlined in the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethical Principles emphasize respecting confidentiality while prioritizing client safety. Societal issues like racial discrimination, religious intolerance, and bullying also inform this ethical landscape, highlighting the importance of culturally responsive practice. The primary ethical tension involves balancing Hannah’s duty to protect Adara from harm with the obligation to respect her autonomy and confidentiality.

Applied Ethical Principles and Standards

Using the APA Ethical Principles (2017) as a framework, several principles are directly relevant. The principle of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence obligates psychologists to promote the well-being of clients and prevent harm. Fidelity and Responsibility emphasize maintaining trust and confidentiality but acknowledge exceptions when a client poses a danger to themselves. Respect for People's Rights and Dignity underlines respecting confidentiality and cultural differences, which are central in this case due to Adara's cultural background and feelings of alienation. The standards related to confidentiality (Standard 4.01) and duty to warn or protect (Standard 4.05) guide the counselor's responsibilities and limits.

Alternative Solutions

Potential solutions include:

1. Maintain confidentiality and encourage Adara to seek help independently.
2. Notify her parents about her disclosures to involve family support, while risking trust and cultural sensitivities.
3. Consult with a mental health professional or ethics board to determine best practices.
4. Provide culturally sensitive psychoeducation to Adara and her family to facilitate understanding and support.
5. Develop a safety plan with Adara that respects her wishes but ensures her safety.

Analyzing these options, informing her parents (Option 2) could jeopardize trust and increase cultural conflict, whereas maintaining confidentiality (Option 1) potentially delays necessary intervention. Consulting professionals (Option 3) aligns with ethical standards and provides guidance, while psychoeducation (Option 4) fosters family involvement and cultural sensitivity. A safety plan (Option 5) balances respecting autonomy with safety concerns.

Ramifications of Alternatives

For three selected options:

1. Informing parents: Risks include damaging client trust, exacerbating her feelings of betrayal, and cultural conflicts, but it might lead to immediate family support and safety.
2. Maintaining confidentiality: Preserves trust but may delay intervention, increasing risk of harm or suicidal behavior.
3. Developing a safety plan: Encourages empowerment and collaborative decision-making, reducing risk while respecting autonomy.

Selected Course of Action

Based on the analysis, the recommended approach is to develop a safety plan collaboratively with Adara, emphasizing her autonomy, safety, and cultural context. This strategy aligns with ethical standards, minimizes harm, and promotes trust. The counselor will educate Adara about her options, involve her in decision-making, and ensure she understands how safety will be maintained without immediately breaching confidentiality. If her risk intensifies, then more direct interventions, including informing her parents, would be ethically justified and legally permissible under the duty to protect.

Research Supporting the Approach

Research by Cross et al. (2016) on adolescent mental health highlights that involving youth actively in safety planning enhances engagement and adherence to safety strategies. Their study employed mixed methods, combining surveys and focus groups, revealing that collaborative safety planning reduces suicidal ideation and increases sense of control among teens. Similarly, Miller and Rollnick’s (2013) work on motivational interviewing demonstrates that emphasizing client autonomy and collaborative engagement fosters intrinsic motivation to seek help and adhere to safety plans. These findings underscore the importance of involving Adara in her safety planning process, respecting her autonomy while ensuring safety.

Furthermore, culturally sensitive interventions have been shown to be effective in diverse populations (Bastos et al., 2019). Training counselors to incorporate cultural values and norms into their practice can buffer against resistance, enhance trust, and improve outcomes for Muslim-American youth facing discrimination and acculturation challenges (Sue et al., 2019). These insights support the need for a culturally competent approach that respects Adara’s background while addressing her mental health needs.

Conclusion

The case of Hannah and Adara underscores the critical importance of balancing ethical obligations, cultural respect, and safety in adolescent mental health practice. Developing a collaborative safety plan, informed by current research and ethical standards, offers a nuanced approach that prioritizes trust, autonomy, and safety. Implementing this plan can foster resilience in Adara, strengthen her trust in her counselor, and promote her well-being amid societal challenges such as discrimination and social isolation. Ethical practice demands sensitivity, cultural competence, and a commitment to beneficence, which together support a comprehensive and ethically sound response to this complex situation.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
• Bastos, A. M., et al. (2019). Culturally Sensitive Mental Health Interventions: A Review. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 26(2), 77–86.
• Cross, W., et al. (2016). Collaborative Safety Planning for Adolescents with Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(3), 543–558.
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. Guilford Press.
• Sue, S., et al. (2019). Culturally Competent Psychological Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 50(6), 435–445.