Write A Literature Review On Credit Card Fraud Detection ✓ Solved

Write a literature review on credit card fraud detection.

Write a literature review on credit card fraud detection.

Paper For Above Instructions

Credit card fraud detection has evolved from rule-based systems to sophisticated machine learning and deep learning approaches designed to cope with highly imbalanced data, evolving attack patterns, and real-time decision requirements. A robust review of the field should cover foundational modeling strategies, representation learning, anomaly detection, and evaluative metrics, while relating these methods to practical deployment considerations in financial services. The following synthesis surveys prominent techniques and their empirical implications, drawing on representative studies to illustrate progression, strengths, and limitations.

Early work in fraud modeling often relied on traditional statistical methods and classic machine learning pipelines. Logistic regression and decision trees were commonly used for churn forecasting and binary fraud classification, providing interpretable baselines and serving as a benchmark for more complex architectures (Nie et al., 2011). As fraud patterns grew more complex and data volumes expanded, researchers began exploring nonlinear models and feature engineering techniques to capture subtle signal interactions. The transition from shallow models to deep representations facilitated learning of discriminative patterns from heterogeneous data sources, including transaction metadata, user behavior, and device context (Li, Liu, & Jiang, 2020).

One notable development is the integration of aggregation strategies and feedback mechanisms to adapt to evolving fraud tactics. Jiang and colleagues proposed a novel approach that combines aggregation at multiple granularities with feedback loops to refine decision boundaries over time, addressing the nonstationarity characteristic of fraud data streams (Jiang et al., 2018). This line of work highlights how ensemble-like aggregation, when coupled with online feedback, can improve resilience to concept drift and reduce misclassification costs in real-world deployments.

High-quality representations have been shown to enhance fraud detection performance, particularly with scarce labeled data. Deep representation learning, especially approaches that optimize discriminative embedding with specialized loss functions, has demonstrated promise for credit card fraud detection. For example, full center loss was proposed to tighten intra-class compactness while preserving inter-class separability, yielding more robust latent spaces for fraud vs. legitimate transactions (Li, Liu, & Jiang, 2020). Such representation-focused methods complement traditional classifiers by providing richer, more separable features for downstream decision rules.

Autoencoder-based and variational approaches also contribute to detection performance by modeling normal transaction patterns and identifying deviations. Variational autoencoders (VAEs) offer probabilistic anomaly scoring that can be integrated into detection pipelines to flag unusual activity with calibrated uncertainty estimates, aiding human analysts in triage and investigation (Tingfei, Guangquan, & Kuihua, 2020). These methods are particularly appealing in fraud detection due to their capacity to model complex, high-dimensional patterns and to adapt to shifting fraud landscapes without requiring exhaustive labeled anomalies.

Beyond representation learning, attention-based and sequence-driven architectures have been explored to capture temporal dynamics and cross-feature interactions in transaction streams. Spatio-temporal attention mechanisms, for example, can weigh the importance of recent events and contextual factors such as merchant category, geography, and time-of-day, enabling more precise discrimination between legitimate and fraudulent activity (Cheng et al., 2020). Related work emphasizes the role of behavior diversity and total-order perspectives in identifying coordinated or anomalous sequences that betray fraudsters’ evolving strategies (Zheng et al., 2018).

Another strand of research addresses challenges associated with imbalanced data and rare-event fraud. Methods that focus on low-frequency transaction detection, including specialized sampling schemes and anomaly-aware scoring, aim to boost recall for rare but costly fraud cases (Zhang et al., 2020). In parallel, feature-level anomaly detection approaches—often framed as one-class or semi-supervised models—seek to identify transactions that diverge from normal usage patterns without requiring extensive fraud labels (Huang et al., 2018).

Evaluative frameworks and metrics are critical in fraud research. Systematic reviews of fraud detection metrics emphasize the need for appropriate measures that reflect class imbalance, cost-sensitive considerations, and operational impact. Metrics such as precision-recall balance, area under the ROC curve, and cost-based evaluation are frequently discussed in the literature, guiding practitioners toward more actionable performance assessments (Omair & Alturki, 2020). These insights underscore that highOverall accuracy can mask poor performance on minority fraud classes, motivating the use of targeted evaluation protocols and threshold tuning in production systems (Nie et al., 2011).

In terms of practical deployment, several studies bridge research and application by examining fraud detection in real-world financial contexts. For instance, hybrid deep learning models have been explored for consumer credit scoring and risk assessment, illustrating how fraud-focused detection and credit-risk analytics can share methodological advances while serving distinct decision objectives (Zhu et al., 2018; Dawood, E., & Elfakhrany, 2019). More recent work also investigates attention-based neural networks and other modern architectures to improve resilience, interpretability, and latency in fraud detection systems operating at scale (Cheng et al., 2020).

Overall, the literature indicates a convergent trend toward hybrid models that blend deep representation learning with robust anomaly handling and adaptive feedback, coupled with rigorous, cost-aware evaluation frameworks. The availability of diverse data sources—transactional, behavioral, and contextual—facilitates richer representations, while online learning and drift-aware strategies help maintain performance in dynamic fraud ecosystems. Nevertheless, challenges persist, including data privacy concerns, label scarcity for emerging fraud types, and the need for explainable AI in highly regulated financial settings. The synthesis below highlights core findings and practical implications for researchers and practitioners alike.

In summary, the trajectory of credit card fraud detection research blends representation learning, anomaly detection, and adaptive decision mechanisms to combat increasingly sophisticated fraud schemes. Foundational methods grounded in logistic regression and decision trees have given way to deep learning models that exploit complex feature interactions and temporal patterns (Nie et al., 2011). Contemporary approaches—encompassing aggregation strategies with feedback, center-loss-based representations, VAEs, and attention-based sequences—demonstrate improved performance in realistic, imbalanced data environments (Jiang et al., 2018; Li, Liu, & Jiang, 2020; Tingfei, Guangquan, & Kuihua, 2020; Zheng et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2018; Cheng et al., 2020; Omair & Alturki, 2020). As the field advances, researchers should continue prioritizing interpretability, fairness, and operational practicality to ensure deployed systems deliver tangible reductions in fraud losses without compromising legitimate customer experiences (Dawood & Elfakhrany, 2019; Nie et al., 2011; Zhou, Zhang, & Jiang, 2020).

References

  1. Jiang, C., Song, J., Liu, G., Zheng, L., & Luan, W. (2018). Credit card fraud detection: A novel approach using aggregation strategy and feedback mechanism. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5(5).
  2. Li, Z., Liu, G., & Jiang, C. (2020). Deep representation learning with full center loss for credit card fraud detection. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 7(2).
  3. Tingfei, H., Guangquan, C., & Kuihua, H. (2020). Using Variational Auto Encoding in Credit Card Fraud Detection. IEEE Access, 8.
  4. Zheng, L., Liu, G., Yan, C., & Jiang, C. (2018). Transaction fraud detection based on total order relation and behavior diversity. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5(3).
  5. Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Liu, Q., & Wang, P. (2020). A Fraud Detection Method for Low-Frequency Transaction. IEEE Access, 8.
  6. Huang, D., Mu, D., Yang, L., & Cai, X. (2018). CoDetect: Financial fraud detection with anomaly feature detection. IEEE Access, 6.
  7. Cheng, D., Xiang, S., Shang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., & Zhang, L. (2020). Spatio-Temporal Attention-Based Neural Network for Credit Card Fraud Detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  8. Omair, B., & Alturki, A. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review of Fraud Detection Metrics in Business Processes. IEEE Access, 8.
  9. Nie, G., Wei, R., Zhang, L., Tian, Y., and Shi, Y. (2011). Credit card churn forecasting by logistic regression and decision tree. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12).
  10. Zhou, X., Zhang, W., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Personal Credit Default Prediction Model Based on Convolution Neural Network. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020.

Related Assignments