Write A Response For Each Answer As A Discussion Class
Write A Response For Each Answer As A Discussion Clas That We Have To
Write a response for each answer as a discussion class that we have to respond to each other's answers. I will copy and paste all my classmate answers about many different topics, and you have to write a simple comment under each one; there are 5 answers needing responses.
Paper For Above instruction
1. Kentucky has shifted its health care coverage by requiring citizens to use the federal health exchange instead of kynect. Proponents claim it will save money while allowing enrollment in qualified plans, but opponents fear confusion, coverage loss, and increased premiums for healthy individuals. Governor Bevin justifies the move with responsibility measures. The debate reflects social gospel views promoting collective care versus individual responsibility rooted in Puritan ethics, with California’s ACA implementation as a contrasting example.
2. Robert Banes faced significant obstacles receiving care due to socioeconomic disadvantages, lack of health awareness, and perceived discrimination based on ethnicity and income. His indifference towards his health and unhealthy lifestyle choices compounded his issues. The ACA could have provided pathways for treatment, yet his disinterest and societal factors limited his options, illustrating how social disadvantages deeply influence health outcomes for minorities, especially those with terminal illnesses.
3. The article from the New York Times discusses the exclusion of gay men and lesbians from 15% of clinical trials, with no scientific rationale. These exclusions predominantly concern sexual health studies but also extend to conditions like asthma. Such discrimination delays access to new treatments and perpetuates social stigmas, showing how social environment and prejudice continue to impact health equity for the LGBTQ+ community.
4. According to Friedson, the doctor-patient encounter is characterized by the capacity to accommodate each other, the patient’s health literacy, and the doctor's social standing, which influences power dynamics. Stevens highlights the development of medical practices through specialization, certification, and continuous education. The proliferation of specialties affects trust and access, especially in urban areas where government management can ensure equitable care options, crucial for underserved populations.
5. Grace Budrys notes that societal needs shape medical institutions like urgent care clinics, which emerge due to gaps in traditional care access. Neighmond describes their rise as convenient alternatives to ER visits, especially when usual providers are inaccessible. These clinics, either independent or hospital-affiliated, increase access and reduce costs, responding to the high demand for immediate care outside standard hours.
Paper For Above instruction
Response to each classmate's answer:
1. The shift in Kentucky’s healthcare policy emphasizes cost-saving and personal responsibility, reflecting a broader debate between collective welfare and individual accountability. While proponents see it as a way to streamline coverage and save money, opponents’ concerns about coverage gaps and the burden of premiums highlight ongoing challenges in balancing efficiency with comprehensive care. The social gospel attitude promotes universal coverage, advocating for societal responsibility, whereas the puritan view emphasizes personal responsibility, illustrating the ideological divide shaping health policies. California’s experience with ACA implementation showcases how government-led initiatives can facilitate affordable coverage for vulnerable populations, yet the debate remains about whether such strategies sufficiently address disparities or merely shift responsibilities.
2. Robert Banes’ case underscores how socioeconomic status and social disadvantages critically influence health outcomes. His lack of health awareness, limited resources, and perceived discrimination highlight systemic inequities faced by minorities. His indifference toward treatment and unhealthy lifestyle choices reflect a complex interplay of individual agency and societal barriers. The ACA’s potential to expand access is evident, but its effectiveness relies on addressing broader social determinants—such as education, poverty, and cultural competence in healthcare—to truly improve health equity for marginalized groups like Robert.
3. The exclusion of LGBTQ+ individuals from clinical trials signifies persistent social biases within the healthcare research system. These discriminatory practices undermine equitable access to emerging treatments and reinforce stigmas associated with sexual orientation. Creating inclusive research environments is essential for advancing health equity. Recognizing that social prejudices influence medical science highlights the importance of policy reform and cultural change within healthcare to ensure all populations benefit from scientific progress without discrimination or delay.
4. Friedson’s characterization of the doctor-patient encounter emphasizes the importance of mutual accommodation, health literacy, and social standing. These factors influence communication, trust, and treatment adherence. Stevens’ insights into the growth of medical specialization reveal how expertise can improve care but may also create fragmentation and mistrust if not well-managed. Ensuring equitable access to specialists, especially in underserved urban areas, requires effective government oversight and strategic planning. Fostering health literacy and reducing power imbalances can strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and improve health outcomes overall.
5. The rise of urgent care clinics reflects society’s response to barriers in traditional healthcare access, especially outside standard hours. These clinics offer a practical solution to reduce unnecessary ER visits and cut costs, making healthcare more responsive and accessible. Their presence in urban areas and their integration with hospitals suggest a positive trend toward decentralized, patient-centered care. Balancing convenience with quality requires regulation and oversight to ensure that urgent care services meet safety standards while effectively filling gaps created by limited primary care availability.
References
- Blumenthal, D., & Morone, J. (2010). The Affordable Care Act and the future of health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(14), 1284-1287.
- Cohen, J. (2019). Socioeconomic disparities in health and access to care. American Journal of Public Health, 109(4), 509-510.
- Graham, G. (2014). Discrimination and health: A review of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 115, 146-154.
- Kaiser Family Foundation. (2022). Health insurance coverage and disparities. KFF.org.
- Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2015). Is it time to revisit health disparities? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 56(1), 1-15.
- Roberts, C., & McGinnis, J. (2020). Healthcare systems and equitable access. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(2), 179-193.
- Smith, T. B., & McDonough, J. E. (2019). The politics of health policy reform. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(4), 835-844.
- Thomas, L. (2018). Specialization and trust in medical practice. Medical Sociology Review, 34(3), 273-289.
- Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2013). Racism and health: Pathways and evidence. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1096-1110.
- Yu, J., & Blumenthal, D. (2017). The impact of urgent care clinics on emergency department use. Health Affairs, 36(9), 1614-1622.