Write A Summary Of My Leadership Approach And How I Would Ha

Write A Summarymy Leadership Approach How Would I Have Handled That

Write a summary of your leadership approach: how would you have handled two different scenarios you have witnessed, read about, or seen on television? Visualize each scenario and consider how you would have applied a different leadership style. For example, if passing a construction site where the crane operator appears competent and confident, you might choose a delegating leadership style, recognizing her independence, while still acknowledging her work. Conversely, in a violent incident at a hockey game, you might opt for a directive approach, imposing strict actions such as suspensions and fines without negotiation to swiftly restore order. Reflect on how you would adapt your leadership style in each situation based on the context.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership is a dynamic and context-dependent skill that requires the ability to adapt to different situations effectively. The decisions made by leaders directly influence outcomes ranging from productivity and safety to moral and social consequences. Through analyzing specific scenarios, one can demonstrate understanding of various leadership styles—including delegating, authoritative, and directive approaches—and how these can be applied appropriately based on situational cues.

In the first scenario, observing a crane operator at a construction site exemplifies a situation where a delegating leadership style is most suitable. The operator’s confidence and competence indicate a high level of self-sufficiency, which aligns well with a leadership approach that grants autonomy while maintaining accountability. Such leaders trust their team members to complete tasks independently, offering support and recognition without unnecessary interference. Applying this approach fosters a sense of responsibility and boosts morale, which can enhance productivity and job satisfaction. An effective leader recognizes the competence of team members and balances delegation with appreciation, ensuring that efforts are acknowledged and motivation remains high (Goleman, 2000).

Conversely, the second scenario involving a violent altercation at a professional hockey game calls for a highly directive leadership approach. Here, swift and decisive action is critical to restore order, uphold the integrity of the sport, and maintain public safety. A leader in this context must impose immediate sanctions—such as suspensions and fines—without room for negotiation, emphasizing authority and control. This approach aligns with transactional leadership principles, which prioritize compliance through clear rules and consequences. The emphasis on strong, decisive intervention aims to deter future violence and reinforce standards of conduct (Bass & Avolio, 1994). While overly authoritarian styles can sometimes undermine morale, in high-stakes, safety-critical scenarios, decisiveness often overrides other considerations, making it the most appropriate approach.

These contrasting scenarios highlight the importance of situational leadership—the concept emphasizing that no one style is universally applicable. Effective leaders assess the environment, the capabilities of their team, and the urgency of the situation before selecting an appropriate approach. Transformational leadership, which inspires and motivates followers, may be suitable in scenarios demanding innovation and morale-building, whereas transactional or directive styles are often necessary for crisis management or tasks requiring strict compliance.

In practice, adapting leadership styles involves understanding the underlying needs of followers and the demands of the situation. For example, a leader might employ a participative style during team development phases, promoting collaboration and shared decision-making. Conversely, during emergencies, an authoritative or commanding style is more appropriate, as it helps mobilize rapid action. Recognizing how to pivot between styles enhances a leader’s effectiveness and fosters positive outcomes across diverse circumstances (Northouse, 2018).

Ultimately, effective leadership requires flexibility, awareness, and a deep understanding of human behavior. By applying suitable leadership approaches tailored to specific scenarios, leaders can inspire confidence, ensure safety, and achieve organizational or collective goals efficiently. As demonstrated through these examples, a nuanced approach—grounded in situational understanding—can significantly improve the management of complex, dynamic environments.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Sage Publications.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental and Expressive Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 318–339.
• Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2012). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Lipman-Blumen, J. (2005). The Allure of Toxic Leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 393-403.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. McGraw-Hill.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Vierlet, A., & Davis, P. (2006). Situational Leadership Revisited. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(7), 612-623.