Write The Introduction To Your Final Portfolio Project ✓ Solved

Write the introduction to your final portfolio project (2-3

Write the introduction to your final portfolio project (2-3 pages), comprehensively describing the industry you are choosing to use in the paper and preliminary challenges with information governance that you have identified. Use 3-5 sources from the UC Library. Expect scholarly work, using largely peer-reviewed resources, formatted to APA 7 style.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

The healthcare industry is a complex, highly regulated sector that generates and consumes vast amounts of sensitive information across clinical, administrative, research, and financial domains. This introduction outlines the healthcare industry’s structure and information ecosystem, identifies preliminary information governance (IG) challenges, and frames the governance priorities that will guide the final portfolio project. Effective IG in healthcare must reconcile privacy and security requirements with clinical utility, research needs, interoperability, and emerging analytics capabilities (Raghupathi & Raghupathi, 2014; Adler-Milstein & Jha, 2017).

Industry Overview

Healthcare comprises hospitals, outpatient clinics, primary care practices, specialty care providers, payers (insurance companies), public health agencies, and ancillary services such as laboratories and pharmacies. Together these stakeholders manage electronic health records (EHRs), imaging data, laboratory results, billing and claims data, patient-generated health data (PGHD), and increasingly genomic and wearable-device streams. The U.S. healthcare system is governed by federal and state regulations, most notably HIPAA privacy and security rules, as well as regulatory guidance from agencies such as the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS], 2013; ONC, 2015).

Data Characteristics and Stakeholders

Healthcare data are heterogeneous (structured, semi-structured, unstructured), high-volume, and often highly sensitive. Key stakeholder groups include clinicians, health information management professionals, IT and security teams, researchers, payers, patients, and regulators. The multiplicity of systems—legacy EHRs, specialty departmental systems, health information exchanges (HIEs), and cloud platforms—creates complex data flows and numerous ownership and stewardship boundaries (Adler-Milstein & Jha, 2017; HIMSS, 2020).

Preliminary Information Governance Challenges

Through an initial survey of literature and industry sources, several primary IG challenges emerge in healthcare. These are described below with brief evidentiary support and implications for governance design.

1. Privacy, Consent, and Regulatory Compliance

Protecting patient privacy and complying with HIPAA and related regulations remain core IG concerns. Consent management for secondary uses (research, public health) and cross-jurisdictional data sharing complicate governance policies (HHS, 2013). Balancing de-identification for research with re-identification risks from linked datasets is an ongoing issue (Bates et al., 2018).

2. Interoperability and Data Exchange

Fragmented systems and nonstandard implementations of data standards (e.g., HL7 FHIR, CDA) hinder reliable exchange and semantic interoperability. Governance must address standards adoption, data mapping, and trust frameworks to enable meaningful clinical data sharing (Kwon et al., 2019; ONC, 2015).

3. Data Quality and Metadata Management

Clinical decision-making and analytics depend on accurate, complete, and timely data. Variability in documentation practices, coding, and incomplete capture of social determinants of health cause data quality problems. Robust metadata, lineage, and master data management are required to support provenance and reuse (Denecke & Deng, 2015; Raghupathi & Raghupathi, 2014).

4. Security and Cyber Risk

Healthcare is a frequent target for cyberattacks. Ransomware, credential compromise, and insider threats endanger data confidentiality and availability. IG must integrate with cybersecurity frameworks (e.g., NIST) to operationalize risk assessments, incident response, and controlled data access (NIST, 2018).

5. Governance for Advanced Analytics and AI

The rise of machine learning and AI in diagnosis, triage, and population health introduces governance needs around model transparency, bias mitigation, validation, and monitoring. Policies must govern data used for model training, ensure representative samples, and define accountability for algorithmic decisions (Bates et al., 2018).

6. Legacy Systems and Migration

Many provider organizations operate legacy systems with limited interoperability and poor support for modern security controls. Data migration, consolidation, and ensuring historical record integrity are essential governance tasks during modernization or EHR replacement (Adler-Milstein & Jha, 2017).

7. Cultural and Organizational Challenges

IG is as much about people and processes as about technology. Weak role definitions, lack of executive sponsorship, and competing departmental priorities can undermine policy adoption. Effective governance requires defined stewardship roles, training, and enforcement mechanisms (HIMSS, 2020).

Initial Governance Priorities

Based on these challenges, the project will prioritize the following governance elements for the healthcare industry: (1) establishing clear data stewardship and ownership roles across clinical and administrative domains; (2) implementing standardized metadata, master data management, and quality metrics; (3) aligning interoperability strategy with FHIR and national exchange frameworks; (4) integrating privacy-by-design and consent management for secondary uses; (5) adopting cybersecurity controls consistent with NIST guidance; and (6) creating an AI governance overlay for model governance and fairness monitoring (NIST, 2018; HIMSS, 2020).

Scope and Methodology for Portfolio Project

The final portfolio will expand this introduction by conducting a literature-backed assessment of IG maturity in healthcare, mapping stakeholder responsibilities, and proposing a governance framework that includes policy templates, role descriptions, metadata standards, and a phased implementation roadmap. The work will draw on peer-reviewed studies, industry frameworks, and authoritative guidance (Raghupathi & Raghupathi, 2014; Kwon et al., 2019).

Conclusion

This introduction frames healthcare as an industry with acute IG needs driven by data sensitivity, regulatory constraints, system heterogeneity, and rapid adoption of analytics. Addressing privacy, interoperability, data quality, security, and organizational culture will be central to the governance approach developed in the subsequent portfolio deliverables.

References

  • Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416–1422. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1650
  • Bates, D. W., Saria, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Shah, A., & Escobar, G. (2018). Big data in health care: Using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients. JAMA, 320(8), 711–712.
  • Denecke, K., & Deng, Y. (2015). Data quality in health information systems — A survey and research agenda. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(12), 1028–1038.
  • HIMSS. (2020). Principles for Information Governance in Health Care. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.
  • HHS. (2013). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy and Security Rules. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • Kwon, J. M., Lee, Y., & Kim, H. (2019). Interoperability challenges in healthcare data exchange: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e13799.
  • NIST. (2018). Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  • ONC. (2015). Connecting Health and Care for the Nation: A Shared Nationwide Interoperability Roadmap. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
  • Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014). Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential. Health Information Science and Systems, 2(3).
  • Bresnick, J. (2019). Governing AI in healthcare: Frameworks and best practices. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 3(2), 116–129.