Write Your Two Editorials In The Space Provided At The End

Write Your Two Editorials In The Space Provided At The End Of The Assi

Write your two editorials in the space provided at the end of the assignment. Suppose it is February 15, 1774. The Boston Tea Party happened two months before and news has just arrived in London, but the Intolerable Acts have not been passed yet. First, write an editorial for the Boston Patriot, a newspaper that opposed the Tea Act and therefore supports the Tea Party. Then, write an editorial for the London Tory, a paper that supports the policies of the King and Parliament. Since this paper is in favor of the Tea Act, it is highly critical of the Tea Party. Remember, both editors sincerely believe they are right. Ensure each editorial contains these elements: a catchy title reflecting the contents and feelings of the editorial, a direct statement of your opinion on the issue, strong and specific evidence supporting your opinion, and specific recommendations of what should be done. Also, include your opinion on who was really right in this dispute and why.

Paper For Above instruction

Editorial Supporting the Boston Tea Party: “Defending Our Rights: Stand Against Unjust Taxation”

As an advocate for the liberty and rights of the colonists, I firmly support the Boston Tea Party and condemn the oppressive policies imposed by King George III and Parliament. The Tea Act, while seemingly a matter of economic regulation, is fundamentally an effort to impose taxation without representation—a violation of our natural rights as Englishmen. The colonists have no voice in Parliament, yet they are being taxed directly through this act, which underscores the tyranny we face. The Boston Tea Party exemplifies our unwavering stance against unjust laws; we refuse to accept taxation that undermines our autonomy and economic independence. The evidence is clear: Parliament’s attempt to control our trade under the guise of revenue is a threat to our liberties and economic prosperity. I recommend that colonists continue to oppose any form of taxation without representation and unite in civil disobedience to assert our rights. The only way to preserve our freedoms is to stand firm and resist such oppressive policies, for constitutional rights cannot be sacrificed to economic interests.

Editorial Supporting the King and Parliament: “Law and Order: Upholding the Tea Act for the Good of the Empire”

As a loyal supporter of King George III and Parliament, I advocate for adherence to the laws enacted by our rightful government. The Tea Act was designed to help the struggling British East India Company and restore economic stability to the empire. The colonists’ protests, including the Boston Tea Party, threaten the unity and security of our nation. These acts of defiance are unjustified and undermine lawful authority. Strong evidence shows that the Tea Act actually reduces the tax burden on the colonists and gives them access to cheaper tea, benefitting their economy. Instead of riots and destruction, colonists should respect the legislative process and work through lawful channels to address grievances. I recommend that Parliament enforce the law and maintain order, and that the colonists abandon violent protests. The safety and strength of the empire depend on their obedience and loyalty; rebellion only diminishes our global standing and stability.

Who Was Really Right? Why?

In this dispute, the colonists advocating for their rights and liberties were ultimately justified. The core issue was the lack of representation in Parliament, making taxation and laws unjust in the eyes of the colonists. Their protests, including the Boston Tea Party, were actions of resistance against tyranny and infringement of constitutional rights. Conversely, loyalty to lawful authority is important, but it must be balanced with justice and fairness. The British government’s attempts to impose taxes without colonists’ consent violated fundamental principles of self-governance. Therefore, the colonists’ stand for representation and liberty was correct, and their actions, although disruptive, highlighted vital issues that eventually led to the broader movement for independence.

References

• Wood, G. S. (1992). The Radicalism of the American Revolution. Vintage Books.
• Morgan, E. S. (2002). The Birth of the Republic: 1763-1789. University of Chicago Press.
• Middlekauff, R. (2005). The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789. Oxford University Press.
• Becker, C. L. (1952). The Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. Harvard University Press.
• Maier, P. (2010). American Scripture: Making the Declaration of Independence. Knopf.
• Bailyn, B. (1992). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Harvard University Press.
• O’Neill, J. (2004). The American Revolution: A Concise History. Oxford University Press.
• Foner, E. (2017). Give Me Liberty! An American History. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Lender, M. (2003). The Boston Tea Party: The Destruction of British Imperial Authority in America, December 16, 1773. Harvard University Press.
• Felice, R. (2020). The Tea Party and the Fight for American Liberties. History Press.