Writing A Critique: Your Critique Should Have A Title Page

Writing A Critiqueyour Critique Should Have A Title Page Thatonly Inc

Writing a Critique Your critique should have a title page that only includes the name of the article the source of the article the author’s name(s) and your name Prepare and type an additional two to three-page double-spaced critique with 1 inch margins and a Times New Roman font of 12 point covering the following: 1. Introduction: Mention the author, article’s title, thesis and main points. Briefly discuss relevant background information relating to the scientific issue or problem presented in the article; write this as a short summary of the article. 2. Analysis: What is the author’s purpose for writing (inform, persuade, recommend, etc.)? Who do you believe the author’s target audience is? What are the author’s supporting points? Do they directly support the main idea? Are they based on research, or are they simply someone’s opinion? Briefly discuss the research methodology. (Did they only do research by referring to other articles or did they do their own experiments?) 3. Relevance and Applicability: Is the author’s article effective? Why or why not? Do you agree with the author’s conclusions? Why or why not? What implications (resulting effects) do the main points and conclusions present to the scientific (or other) community, people, environment, etc.? How could you use the author’s findings in your future studies? Can you apply the findings to your own life? If so, how? If not, why not? Would you recommend this article to others? Why or why not? 4. Other Criteria What other criteria did you assign to your critique? At least three additional criteria should be added to the above criteria.

Paper For Above instruction

Title Page:

• Article Title: [Insert article title]
• Source of the Article: [Insert publication/source]
• Author(s): [Insert author names]
• Your Name: [Insert your name]

Introduction

The article titled "[Insert article title]" authored by [Author Name] critically examines [briefly describe the main scientific issue or problem discussed]. The author aims to inform and persuade readers about [main thesis], emphasizing key points such as [list main points]. The background information provided situates the article within the broader scientific context, addressing current challenges and advances relevant to the issue. The article’s main thesis contends that [state thesis], supported by evidence and research findings.

In summary, the article explores [briefly describe the scope of the article], presenting a detailed analysis of [topic]. It provides insights into [specific aspects], highlighting their significance in contributing to the scientific understanding of [issue]. This summary serves as a foundation for analyzing the effectiveness and implications of the author's work.

Analysis

The author’s primary purpose is [to inform, persuade, recommend, etc.], aiming to [explain, advocate, suggest]. The target audience appears to be [scientists, policymakers, students, general public], based on the language, depth of technical detail, and the nature of the arguments presented. The supporting points are [list major supporting points], which directly support the main idea by [explain how they do so].

The supporting points are primarily based on [research, theoretical analysis, opinion], with a significant reliance on [primary research or secondary sources]. The research methodology involves [discuss whether the author conducted experiments, surveys, meta-analyses, or simply reviewed existing literature], which impacts the strength and reliability of the conclusions.

Relevance and Applicability

The article’s effectiveness depends on [clarity, evidence, relevance to current issues], which makes it [effective/ineffective]. Personally, I agree/disagree with the author’s conclusions because [provide reasons]. The implications of the findings are significant for the scientific community, as they suggest [potential impacts], which could influence policy, future research, or practical applications.

In terms of future studies, I can utilize the author’s findings by [explain how], perhaps by integrating their approach or data into my work. Some findings might be applicable to my personal life, particularly in [explain how, e.g., environmental awareness, health decisions]. I would recommend this article to colleagues/students because [reasons], as it provides valuable insights into [topic].

Other Criteria

Additional criteria I considered include:

• Clarity and organization of the content
• Use of credible and recent references
• Contribution to current scientific debates

References

• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Title of the article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), page numbers. https://doi.org/xxx
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Book Title. Publisher.
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Website Title. URL
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Article on a credible site. Source/Publisher. URL
• Author Last Name, First Initial. (Year). Research study. Journal Name, Volume, pages. https://doi.org/xxx
• Additional references as needed based on research
• ...