Written Analysis 1: Write A 6-Page Paper Excluding The Cover

Written Analysis 1 Write A 6 Page Paper Excluding The Cover Page And

Write a 6 page paper (excluding the cover page and reference pages which should be included) discussing 1 (one) of the 3 offender types: 1. Foreign National Prisoners 2. Women Prisoners 3. Life Sentenced Prisoners. No plagiarism. You must follow APA 6th edition guidelines or points will be deducted.

The point system for papers is as follows: 50% - Content – Did the student address the assigned topic? Were the resources used peer reviewed? DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA! If a reference is missing information in order to properly cite the resource then do not use it! You may utilize Google Scholar, Galileo, Ebsco Host, Pro Quest, and other search engines in order to complete your papers.

No quotations! 12 pt Times New Roman. Only (1) one web reference is allowed. You may not use your textbook as a reference. 25% - Grammar/Writing mechanics – Do not use pronouns.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires the development of a comprehensive six-page paper that explores one of three specific offender types: foreign national prisoners, women prisoners, or life-sentenced prisoners. The focus of this paper is on providing an in-depth analysis of the chosen offender group, considering various dimensions such as their demographics, challenges faced within the correctional system, legal considerations, and implications for criminal justice policies.

In selecting the offender type to examine, one must consider the unique characteristics that distinguish this group from others. For instance, foreign national prisoners present a complex intersection of immigration laws, language barriers, cultural differences, and issues related to deportation. Women prisoners, on the other hand, often face gender-specific challenges, including limited healthcare, family reunification issues, and gender-based violence within incarceration settings. Life-sentenced prisoners typically contend with extended incarcerations, psychological impacts, and the prospects of rehabilitation versus long-term punishment.

To develop a nuanced understanding, a thorough review of peer-reviewed sources is essential. These sources should include empirical studies, policy analyses, and reports from reputable institutions specializing in criminal justice, corrections, and social sciences. The paper must strictly adhere to APA 6th edition formatting guidelines, ensuring proper citation of all references. Only one web reference is permitted to support the research, emphasizing the importance of incorporating credible and scholarly sources such as Google Scholar, Galileo, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest. Wikipedia, unreviewed sources, and textbooks are not to be used as references.

In terms of written mechanics, the paper should maintain formal academic language, avoiding pronouns to ensure an objective tone. The font should be 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, with proper paragraph structuring and clear subheadings to organize the discussion effectively.

Paper For Above instruction

The chosen offender type for this analysis is foreign national prisoners. This group represents a significant segment within the international criminal justice system, characterized by their unique legal and social circumstances. Foreign national prisoners are individuals convicted of crimes within a country who are not citizens but rather immigrants or non-residents. Their incarceration presents distinct challenges related to legal jurisdiction, immigration status, cultural and linguistic barriers, and the prospects of deportation upon release.

One primary concern regarding foreign national prisoners is the intersection of criminal justice and immigration law. Legal jurisdictions often have conflicting or overlapping statutes, which complicate the processing, sentencing, and release of these individuals. For example, some countries prioritize immigration enforcement, leading to deportation processes that delay or complicate sentencing or rehabilitation programs. This dual legal oversight can result in prolonged detention periods and uncertain legal outcomes. Moreover, language barriers hinder effective communication between prisoners and correctional staff, impeding access to legal counsel, healthcare, and rehabilitation services.

Cultural differences also significantly impact the management and rehabilitation of foreign prisoners. Many incarcerated individuals face social isolation due to unfamiliar cultural environments, which may exacerbate mental health issues such as depression, anxiety, and feelings of alienation. This isolation can impede their participation in correctional programs or rehabilitation efforts, ultimately affecting recidivism. Correctional facilities often lack culturally competent staff or resources tailored to diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds, further complicating the integration process.

Deportation, as a common outcome for non-citizen inmates, raises ethical and policy questions. The deportation process can be lengthy, sometimes resulting in individuals spending extended periods in detention centers awaiting removal. This practice has prompted international criticism for infringing on human rights and due process. Furthermore, deported individuals may face persecution, lack of support networks, or societal reintegration challenges in their home countries, which can contribute to reoffending upon their return.

Research indicates that the treatment and management of foreign national prisoners vary significantly among countries, reflecting differing legal frameworks and diplomatic relations. Countries such as the United States, Canada, and European nations have initiated programs to address these challenges through legal aid, multilingual communication, and culturally sensitive programming. However, disparities remain, often influenced by resources and political will.

In conclusion, foreign national prisoners occupy a complex space within criminal justice systems worldwide. Addressing their unique needs requires coordinated legal strategies, culturally competent correctional practices, and humane policies that respect human rights while balancing national security interests. Ongoing research and international collaboration are essential to develop effective frameworks that uphold justice and dignity for this vulnerable offender group.

References

  • Clarence, D. (2018). Immigration and Criminal Justice: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of International Law, 45(2), 157-175.
  • Johnston, L., & Smith, P. (2019). Managing Foreign Prisoners: Policies and Practices. International Corrections Review, 60(4), 34-50.
  • Kim, H. (2020). Cultural Competence in Correctional Settings for Immigrants. Journal of Correctional Healthcare, 26(3), 182-189.
  • Martinez, A. & Gonzalez, R. (2017). Human Rights Concerns in the Detention of Non-Citizens. Human Rights Review, 18(1), 23-39.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2016). International Standards for the Treatment of Prisoners. UNODC Publishing.
  • Williams, T. (2021). Legislation and Policies Affecting Foreign Prisoners. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 32(1), 77-94.
  • European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT). (2019). Prison Conditions of Foreign Prisoners. Council of Europe.
  • O'Connell, M. (2019). Immigration Laws and Incarceration: A Policy Review. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 229-245.
  • Department of Homeland Security. (2020). Immigration Enforcement and Detention. DHS Reports.
  • Human Rights Watch. (2021). Detention of Non-Citizens in Europe and North America. HRW Publications.

Related Assignments