Written Report Required Format: Create Title Page The Title

Written Report Required Format Create Title Page The Title Page Needs

Create Title page: The title page needs to provide information about the paper’s topic, the author/student name and the course to which it is being submitted. (5 points ) Create Abstract page: The abstract needs to provide a brief but comprehensive summary of the contents of your paper (looks like an outline for your report- 10 points) Summary of the facts- (10points) Identify the Ethical problem and ethical principle(s) involved and explain why-(25points) Identify and discuss the various points of view presented - (15points) Analysis of issue presented- (include you point of view and how you would solve the ethical dilemma) (15points) Closing Statement (8points) Three References- (12 points) P.S.

The general APA formatting standard is 12 pt. font, Times New Roman, double-spaced with one-inch margins. These basics can be found in almost all the popular formatting styles, so you will make no mistake when following them in all of your papers.

Paper For Above instruction

Title Page

Title: Ethical Dilemmas and Principles in Professional Practice

Author: Jane Doe

Course: Ethics in Professional Fields

Abstract

This report explores a complex ethical dilemma encountered in professional practice, examining the relevant facts, the ethical principles at stake, and the various perspectives involved. The paper begins by outlining the factual background of the dilemma, followed by an identification of the core ethical issues and principles such as autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Multiple viewpoints from stakeholders are analyzed, including the perspectives of the client, the professional, and regulatory bodies. An in-depth analysis incorporates my personal stance and proposes a resolution to the ethical conflict. The report concludes with a closing statement summarizing the importance of ethical awareness and decision-making in maintaining professional integrity.

Summary of the Facts

The case involves a licensed healthcare provider faced with a situation where a patient requests a treatment that conflicts with existing medical guidelines and the provider’s ethical obligations. The patient insists on a procedure that the provider believes to be unnecessary and potentially harmful. The provider must navigate the delicate balance between respecting patient autonomy and adhering to professional standards designed to prevent harm. Factors contributing to the dilemma include patient pressure, cultural considerations, and the provider's duty to ensure safety and evidence-based practice.

Identification of the Ethical Problem and Principles

The core ethical problem centers on whether the healthcare provider should honor the patient’s autonomous request despite concerns about safety and appropriateness. The key ethical principles involved include respect for autonomy, beneficence (promoting the well-being of the patient), non-maleficence (avoiding harm), and justice (fair allocation of resources). Respecting autonomy supports honoring the patient’s wishes, but beneficence and non-maleficence urge caution to prevent harm. Justice relates to equitable resource use and avoiding unnecessary procedures that may consume limited healthcare resources.

This dilemma exemplifies the tension between individual rights and professional responsibility, a common issue across numerous clinical situations.

Points of View Presented

Several perspectives are evident in this case. The patient’s viewpoint emphasizes personal choice and autonomy, asserting the right to make decisions about their health. The healthcare provider’s view prioritizes evidence-based practice and professional responsibility to do no harm. Regulatory and legal considerations stress adherence to guidelines and standards that protect patient safety and public trust. Additionally, cultural factors influence perceptions of medical interventions, affecting decision-making processes. Each perspective highlights different priorities, creating a multifaceted ethical landscape that complicates straightforward decisions.

Analysis and Personal Perspective

Analyzing these viewpoints, I believe the healthcare provider must prioritize informed consent and shared decision-making, ensuring the patient understands the risks and benefits involved. While respecting autonomy, the provider should communicate concerns about potential harm and suggest alternative solutions aligned with evidence-based practices. My solution involves implementing thorough discussions that empower the patient without compromising safety. Ethically, I advocate for a balanced approach that respects individual rights while fulfilling the professional duty to protect health and well-being. This approach fosters trust, enhances patient-provider relationships, and aligns with fundamental ethical principles.

In resolving such dilemmas, I also propose involving ethics committees or consulting colleagues to obtain diverse perspectives and ensure accountability. Ultimately, fostering open communication and emphasizing education can help navigate complex ethical situations effectively.

Closing Statement

Ethical decision-making in healthcare requires balancing respect for patient autonomy with the provider’s obligation to safeguard health. Recognizing the multifaceted nature of ethical dilemmas is essential for fostering trust, ensuring safety, and maintaining professional integrity. Continuous education and ethical reflection are vital tools for professionals facing such challenges, ultimately promoting ethical excellence in practice.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Gillon, R. (2015). Ethics Needs Principles — Four principles approach. BMJ, 309(6948), 184–188.
• Jonsen, A. R., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. J. (2010). Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Köchler, H. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in healthcare: a review of current issues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(2), 77–81.
• Schneider, C., & Ingram, M. (2014). Ethical dilemmas in patient care: dealing with conflicting values. Journal of Nursing Ethics, 21(4), 498–510.
• Childress, J. F., & Siegel, D. (2015). Medical ethics and the law. Harvard University Press.
• Resnik, D. B. (2018). The ethics of healthcare resource allocation. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(3), 550–558.
• American Medical Association. (2020). Code of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/code-medical-ethics
• Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press.
• Levine, A. (2018). Ethical issues in healthcare systems. Public Health Ethics, 11(1), 1–9.