You Are The Executive Manager Of A Business It Has Come To

You Are The Executive Manager Of A Business It Has Come To Your Atten

You are the executive manager of a business. It has come to your attention that some of your employees have not been accurately reporting their actual hours worked on their submitted time sheets. You will correct this issue going forward with a formal control system. Following the four steps of a formal control system, write the section of your employee handbook that consists of the standard which details how employees are to properly request leave and report time worked, followed by the other three steps, detailing the proper implementation of a formal control system suitable to this situation.

Paper For Above instruction

The management of any organization relies heavily on the accurate reporting of employee hours and leave requests to ensure operational efficiency, payroll accuracy, and compliance with labor laws. Recognizing issues with misreported hours necessitates implementing a structured formal control system that not only sets clear standards but also ensures consistent adherence through systematic procedures. The following discussion articulates a comprehensive approach rooted in the four steps of a formal control system to address the issue effectively.

Step 1: Establishing Standards

The foundation of a robust control system is the establishment of clear, measurable standards. For managing employee hours and leave requests, the standards should include explicit guidelines on how employees are to record their hours, request leave, and report absences. These standards must emphasize accuracy, honesty, and timeliness. The employee handbook should specify that all time sheets must reflect actual hours worked, with any absences or leave requests documented in advance where possible. The standards should also define the acceptable methods for reporting, such as authorized timesheets submitted via a designated digital platform or physical forms, and include instructions on how to handle overtime, sick leave, and personal days. Clear communication of these standards ensures that employees understand the expectations and the importance of truthful reporting for organizational integrity.

Step 2: Measuring Performance

Once standards are in place, performance measurement involves ongoing monitoring and review of employee timesheets and leave requests. Implementation of a digital time-tracking system can facilitate real-time data collection, reduce manual errors, and create an audit trail. Supervisors or designated managers should regularly compare reported hours with scheduled hours, project deadlines, and physical attendance records. Automated reports can flag discrepancies such as unusually high or low hours or irregular patterns. Periodic audits or spot checks serve as additional measures to ensure compliance. Training sessions should also be conducted periodically to reinforce correct reporting practices and clarify any ambiguities perceived by employees. Consistent performance measurement helps identify deviations from standards promptly, facilitating timely corrective action.

Step 3: Corrective Actions

Addressing deviations from standards involves implementing corrective measures swiftly and effectively. If discrepancies are identified, managers should initiate confidential discussions with employees to understand the reasons behind inaccurate reporting. Additional training or re-education may be necessary to clarify expectations. In cases of intentional misconduct, such as falsifying hours, disciplinary procedures should be enforced per organizational policies, which might include warnings or other sanctions. Reinforcing the importance of integrity in reporting and the consequences of dishonesty is crucial for fostering a culture of accountability. Moreover, feedback mechanisms should be established so employees can raise concerns or seek clarification regarding reporting procedures. By integrating corrective actions within the system, organizations reinforce standards and promote adherence.

Step 4: Feedback and Continuous Improvement

Finally, establishing a feedback loop ensures the control system remains effective and evolves with organizational needs. Management should regularly review reporting processes and gather input from employees about potential challenges or ambiguities. Surveys or focus groups can facilitate this feedback, leading to adjustments in standards or procedures to improve clarity and usability. Recognizing and rewarding accurate reporting can also motivate employees to adhere to standards. Over time, leveraging data analytics from time-tracking systems can reveal trends or recurring issues, prompting further improvements. The goal of continuous improvement is to foster a transparent, accountable environment where accurate reporting is ingrained in organizational culture, thus preventing future discrepancies and enhancing operational integrity.

Conclusion

Implementing a formal control system based on clear standards, systematic measurement, prompt corrective actions, and ongoing feedback is essential for rectifying issues related to misreported employee hours. By carefully constructing each component, organizations can promote honesty, accountability, and efficiency. The employee handbook’s section on reporting standards, complemented by the structured steps of control implementation, will serve as a solid framework for cultivating a workplace culture rooted in accuracy and integrity.

References

• Anthony, R. N., Govindarajan, V., & Hartmann, F. (2014). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382.
• Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
• Banker, R. D., & Kauffman, R. J. (2004). The control problem and management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(1), 3-3.
• Buzacott, J. A., & Shanthikumar, J. G. (2001). Managing Service Operations. Springer.
• Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Pearson Education.
• Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127-168.
• Hilton, R. W., & Maher, M. W. (2012). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Simons, R. (1990). The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 25-48.
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.