You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Production Warehou 753285

You Have Kicked Off The District 4 Production Warehouse Move Project

You have kicked off the District 4 Production Warehouse Move project, your contractors are in place and working on receiving the proper building permits. You originally were told the permits would only take 2 weeks to obtain but the contractors are telling you it will now take 3 weeks. You need to build the additional week into your schedule for each permit that will be obtained. In addition, your framing and drywall contractors have just told you they are running late on their other jobs and can only release half their crew for your project. This will double their schedule. Build the extra time into your schedule by doubling the installation work timelines for both the framing and drywall. Your project plan should also be updated with the new 3-week timeline for obtaining permits. You are now looking at an extended project delivery date. Your project sponsor was very clear that you must be done in a 4 month timeframe so you will need to look at options for reducing your schedule to fit into the 4 month window. You have an option of hiring another contractor to help with the framing and drywall work but it will increase your budget by $200,000. Determine your best course of action for bringing this project in on schedule and update your project plan to reflect your recommendation. Develop a 5-6 slide presentation for senior management outlining your proposed solution. You are seeking approval to proceed with your new plan. Submit both your updated project plan in PDF format and your PowerPoint presentation.

Paper For Above instruction

The successful management of the District 4 Production Warehouse Move project hinges on effective adaptation to unforeseen delays and constraints. The project initially outlined a timeline of approximately four months, with permits expected to be obtained within two weeks. However, recent developments have extended this period to three weeks, requiring updates to the project schedule. Furthermore, constraints faced by the framing and drywall contractors have resulted in halving their available workforce, effectively doubling the installation time for both trades. To address these challenges and ensure the project completes within the stipulated four-month window, a thorough analysis of options is necessary.

First, updating the project schedule to incorporate the revised permit timeline is imperative. Extending the permit acquisition period by one week from two to three weeks impacts the overall project timeline, requiring adjustments to subsequent activities. Additionally, the reduction in crew size for the framing and drywall work effectively doubles their respective timelines. The original schedule assumed full crews, but with only half available, the durations for these tasks will need to be doubled. These adjustments could cause the project to extend beyond the four-month deadline unless mitigated.

To counteract these delays, hiring additional contractors presents a viable solution at an increased cost of $200,000. This approach can potentially revert the extended timelines to an acceptable schedule, enabling completion within the four-month constraint. Alternatively, re-sequencing tasks, optimizing workflows, or increasing work hours could be considered; however, these options might not sufficiently offset the delay incurred by reduced workforce and permit processing times.

After evaluating the options, the most robust solution appears to be hiring additional contractors to accelerate the framing and drywall installations. This approach minimizes schedule compression stress and provides a clear path to meet the completion deadline. The project plan will be updated accordingly, with the new timelines reflecting the additional workforce and permit processing times. This includes adding the extra week for permits, doubling the installation timelines for framing and drywall, and allocating resources for the additional contractor.

In developing the presentation for senior management, emphasis will be placed on the reasons for schedule delays, the risks associated with not adjusting the plan, and the justification for the increased budget. The five-slide presentation will outline the current challenges, the proposed solution of hiring extra contractors, the expected benefits, cost implications, and the request for approval to proceed with the revised plan. This structured approach ensures transparent communication and aligns stakeholders on the necessary adjustments to deliver the project on time.

In conclusion, ensuring the project adheres to the four-month deadline requires strategic modifications to the present plan. The most effective course of action involves accepting the increased budget to hire additional contractors, thereby mitigating schedule risks. With these updates, the project can be delivered successfully, meeting the sponsor’s expectations and maintaining stakeholder confidence.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). Project Management Institute.
• Burke, R. (2013). Project management: Planning and control techniques. Wiley.
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project management jumpstart. Wiley.
• Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project management: A managerial approach. Wiley.
• Lock, D. (2013). Project management. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
• Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2019). Planning resilience for project success. Routledge.
• Kincheloe, J. L., McLaren, P., & Steinberg, S. R. (2011). Critical curriculum studies. Routledge.
• Crawford, J. K. (2014). Project management maturity model. CRC Press.