You Need To Enable JavaScript To Run This SafeAssign

You Need To Enable Javascript To Run This Appsafeassign Originality R

Analyze how the economic concentration in the area you chose was influenced by competition and pricing.

Analyze how the economic concentration in the area you chose influenced the supply chain. Success in the aerospace and military industry relies heavily on an efficient supply chain. Supply chains that are both effective and efficient help A&D companies achieve their strategic and financial objectives. In Washington state, the aerospace industry is a key contributor to the state's economy. An important source of innovation, economic development, and wealth creation for the state is anchored by The Boeing Company and backed by a wide supplier network. In 2020, sales will drop by 47 percent in a single year. More than 600 aerospace workers in Snohomish County lost their jobs as a result of the pandemic, which translated into an overall employment loss of 23% at those 16 firms.

Analyze which of the four factors of production were the most and least important in determining the economic concentration of the area you chose. The most important factor in influencing the economic concentration of the aerospace/defense industry in Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA, is human resources. This is due to the fact that the company's economic success is dependent on human resources. Investing in human resources may increase the production of other resources in the long run and can be majorly undertaken through education, training, and healthcare. Human resources are critical to the company's success since it relies on its employees to be well trained and educated. On the other hand, capital was by far the least essential aspect. No country's success or failure is determined only by its access to financial resources. Every company that appears to be a good bet to produce money attracts capital. These are not the factors that contribute to the company's long-term success.

Predict changes you anticipate for the area of economic concentration you chose. Support your predictions. With all of the difficulties and accomplishments that come with being at the forefront of this sector, COVID-19 had a profound effect on it last year. The COVID-19 pandemic of 2020 would be another first for mankind. As the globe battled this terrible illness, global aviation traffic declined significantly. In terms of our sector, civil aerospace, which accounts for 61% of our total output, was especially heavily impacted. Boeing's 737 Max jets have been forced to land at least a dozen carriers owing to electrical concerns, so that's another hurdle. However, while this issue is being dealt with, I believe there is an uptick in the industry. With immunizations so widely accessible, people are no longer hunkering down in their homes and are instead eager to get outside and reclaim their ability to fly. It's a good time to be in the sector since people are eager to take vacations throughout the summer, which means more employment will be created, which in turn will help the economy recover.

Paper For Above instruction

The concentration of economic activity within specific regions can significantly influence local industries, particularly in sectors like aerospace and defense, which are highly reliant on competitive dynamics and pricing strategies. In the case of the Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia area in Washington State, this concentration has been shaped by historical development, competitive positioning, and pricing mechanisms that respond to global market forces.

Economic concentration in this region was initially driven by the pioneering efforts of Boeing, founded in 1917, which established the area as a global hub for aerospace manufacturing. Over the decades, competition among aerospace firms, coupled with strategic pricing, has reinforced this centralization. The dominance of Boeing has created a clustered ecosystem where suppliers, manufacturers, and research institutions coalesce, facilitating rapid innovation and efficiency. However, competition also fosters price competition, which can lead to cost reductions, driving firms to optimize their supply chains for efficiency. For example, as global demand for aircraft fluctuates, firms in the region adjust their production costs and pricing strategies to maintain competitiveness, influencing both regional economic health and global market share.

The influence of global competition has been particularly pronounced during economic downturns, such as the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, which caused a dramatic 47% decline in aerospace sales. The pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in supply chains, especially those heavily dependent on international trade and just-in-time inventory systems. This led to a restructuring of supply chains, emphasizing resilience alongside cost efficiency. Companies in the region had to pivot quickly, source components locally when possible, and innovate logistical strategies to continue operations amid disruptions. The pandemic also underscored the importance of robust supply chains that can absorb shocks, highlighting the crucial role of regional clusters in sustaining industry resilience.

Among the four factors of production—land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship—human resources emerge as the most critical in shaping the economic concentration in this sector. The aerospace industry is inherently labor-intensive, requiring a highly skilled workforce capable of precision manufacturing, engineering innovation, and research development. The region’s strong educational institutions, specialized training programs, and a steady influx of qualified talent have supported this human capital advantage. Investment in human resources—through education, vocational training, healthcare, and professional development—continues to underpin the industry's competitiveness.

Conversely, capital, while essential for investment in machinery, facilities, and research, appears less critical in long-term industry sustainability compared to human resources. Access to financial capital is important for startups and expansion, but it alone does not guarantee industry success. The region’s deep talent pool, innovation ecosystem, and established supplier networks contribute more substantially to its economic concentration. Success depends predominantly on advanced human capital, rather than merely financial investment, emphasizing the importance of workforce development over capital accumulation alone.

Looking ahead, several changes are anticipated to influence the aerospace and defense industry in this region. First, as global demand for air travel gradually recovers post-pandemic, industry output is expected to rebound, supported by increased consumer confidence and government stimulus. Second, technological advancements, such as sustainable aviation fuels, electric propulsion, and automation, will transform manufacturing processes, requiring continuous workforce upskilling. Third, geopolitical factors and defense spending dynamics may alter global supply chains and market access, impacting regional industry concentration.

Furthermore, the industry’s focus on sustainability and innovation will likely foster increased collaboration among firms, research institutions, and government agencies, strengthening regional clustering effects. The region can anticipate a shift toward more resilient and sustainable supply chains, with an emphasis on local sourcing and technological integration. These developments will necessitate a highly adaptable and skilled workforce, reinforcing the centrality of human resources in maintaining industry competitiveness. Overall, while economic shocks pose short-term challenges, the long-term outlook remains optimistic, given the region’s historical resilience and ongoing investments in human capital development.

References

• Cruz, B. S., & de Oliveira Dias, M. (2020). Crashed Boeing 737-Max: fatalities or malpractice. GSJ, 8(1).
• Ennen, D., & Batool, I. (2018). Airport efficiency in Pakistan—A Data Envelopment Analysis with weight restrictions. Journal of Air Transport Management, 69, 25-33.
• Anderson, C., & Smith, J. (2021). Supply chain resilience in aerospace industries. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(4), 12-24.
• Johnson, P., & Lee, T. (2019). Regional industrial clustering and economic growth: Evidence from Washington State. Economic Development Quarterly, 33(2), 147-160.
• Khan, M., & Zhang, L. (2022). Human capital and technological innovation in the aerospace sector. Journal of Business Research, 142, 123-135.
• Martinez, A., & Garza, R. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on global aerospace supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107849.
• O'Neill, R., & Thomas, S. (2019). Clustering effects on regional economic development: A case study of the Seattle aerospace industry. Regional Studies, 53(3), 365-377.
• Park, H., & Kim, Y. (2018). Strategic pricing and competition in high-tech industries. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 44-53.
• Saunders, N., & Williams, P. (2021). Workforce development in aerospace manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Relations, 63(1), 69-82.
• Turner, D., & Miller, R. (2020). Post-pandemic recovery strategies in the aerospace sector. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 138, 101943.