You Will Need To Be Able To Use These Three Models Blanchard

You Will Need To Be Able To Use These Three Models Blanchard And Peal

Review the sample solutions for the three ethical decision-making models: Blanchard and Peale, Laura Nash, and the Front Page of the Newspaper. Reflect on their applicability to a specific dilemma discussed in the Week 6 Lecture interactive. Consider whether you agree with the analyses provided, which parts helped you work through the dilemma, and how each model facilitated your understanding. Choose one of the three questions related to these models and analyze it in detail within your paper.

Paper For Above instruction

Ethical decision-making models serve as essential tools in navigating complex moral dilemmas faced in both personal and professional contexts. Among these, the models developed by Blanchard and Peale, Laura Nash, and the concept exemplified by the Front Page of the Newspaper provide distinct approaches for evaluating ethical issues. This essay explores their applicability and effectiveness in analyzing a specific dilemma discussed in the Week 6 Lecture interactive, with a focus on one selected question from the provided prompts.

The first model, proposed by Blanchard and Peale, emphasizes the importance of ethical principles, organizational values, and individual character in decision-making. This model advocates for a structured approach where one considers the legal, ethical, and economic aspects of a dilemma, ultimately choosing the action that aligns with core values and promotes integrity. In reviewing the sample solution based on this model, I found that its emphasis on character and principled decision-making helped clarify the moral landscape of the dilemma. The model's focus on fostering personal integrity and aligning decisions with core values can serve as a guide in situations rife with conflicting interests.

The Laura Nash model offers a systematic method that prompts individuals to consider various ethical perspectives and stakeholder implications. It encourages asking a series of questions, such as "Is it legal?" "Is it fair?" "How does it make me feel?" and "What would I tell my daughter or son to do?" This approach helps in broadening one's perspective and assessing the dilemma from multiple angles. In reviewing the sample solution associated with this method, I appreciated how the questions facilitated a comprehensive understanding of the issue, ensuring that underlying motives and societal standards were appropriately considered. The parts of the Nash method that I found particularly helpful include its focus on personal intuition and social consensus, which support morally grounded decision-making.

The Front Page of the Newspaper method involves imagining that the decision or dilemma is being reported as a headline in a newspaper. The key question is whether one would be comfortable with the decision if it appeared publicly. This visualizes the importance of reputation and societal perception in ethical choices. In evaluating its application to the tested dilemma, I believe this method is especially useful in scenarios where transparency and public trust are paramount. Its strength lies in simplifying complex decision-making into a moral litmus test that emphasizes accountability and societal standards.

After reviewing all three models, I found that each provides valuable insights, but their effectiveness varies depending on the nature of the dilemma. The Blanchard and Peale model's focus on character and core values is particularly compelling for dilemmas involving personal integrity, whereas the Nash model's questions help consider a wider array of perspectives. The Front Page method is most effective when societal reputation or public accountability are at stake.

For the purpose of this exercise, I have chosen to analyze how the Laura Nash model particularly helped me work through the presented dilemma. The model’s structured questions prompted me to evaluate the ethical dimensions from diverse angles, balancing personal judgment with societal expectations. This not only clarified my understanding of the dilemma's complexities but also facilitated a morally consistent decision-making process. By explicitly considering questions such as "Is it fair?" and "Would I want to be on the receiving end of this action?", I could critically analyze the potential impacts and ethical considerations involved.

In conclusion, the integration of multiple ethical models enriches the decision-making process, offering varied perspectives and tools for moral reasoning. While each model has its strengths, the choice of which to rely on depends on the specific context and nature of the dilemma. Personally, the Laura Nash model's comprehensive approach, combining questions of legality, fairness, and personal feelings, proved most instrumental in my analysis. Going forward, applying these models collectively can enhance ethical awareness and foster more principled decisions in complex moral landscapes.

References

• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2017). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Bowie, N. E. (2017). Business Ethics in Practice. Oxford University Press.
• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2019). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Sims, R. R. (2016). Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Giants Fall. Greenwood Publishing Group.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices. HarperOne.
• King, P. E., & Malsch, B. (2018). Teaching Business Ethics: A Review and Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(2), 319–327.
• Gert, B. (2011). Morality: its nature and justification. Oxford University Press.
• Rawls, J. (2001). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill Education.