Your First Draft Attached For Reference And Price Posted

I Attached Your First Draft For Reference And I Posted Price You Asked

I attached your first draft for reference and I posted the price you asked for 8-10 pages. Your the best! suggestions from Prof based on rough draft: You are off to a good start towards your final paper! Points were taken off for not touching on an ethical theory or perspective within your thesis statement, and for a couple small APA errors here and there (make sure your references are formatted correctly).

(0.76 / 1) Includes an Introduction and Thesis Statement Basic - Includes a limited introduction and a limited thesis statement that reflects the argument of the paper and links the chosen ethical theories and perspective to the chosen social issue. The introduction and/or thesis statement are underdeveloped.

(5 / 5) Describes at Least Two Ethical Theories and One Ethical Perspective Distinguished - Thoroughly describes at least two ethical theories and one ethical perspective in an accurate, clear, and concise manner. Demonstrates a strong understanding of the course material.

(2.5 / 2.5) Identifies a Social Issue and Applies the Theories and Perspective Distinguished - Accurately identifies the social issue and effectively applies the chosen theories and perspective, thoroughly and clearly explaining how they address the chosen issue.

(1.5 / 1.5) Explains How the Draft Will Be Further Developed in the Final Paper Distinguished - Thoroughly explains how the draft will be further developed in the Final Paper.

(1 / 1) Applied Ethics: Application of Ethical Perspectives/Concepts Distinguished - Independently applies ethical viewpoints to an ethical question correctly and considers the full ramifications of the application.

(1 / 1) Applied Ethics: Understanding Different Ethical Perspectives/Concepts Distinguished - States and describes the theory and accurately explains the details of the theory used.

(0.5 / 0.5) Critical Thinking: Evidence Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

(0.5 / 0.5) Written Communication: APA Formatting Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

(0.5 / 0.5) Written Communication: Page Requirement Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

(0.5 / 0.5) Written Communication: Resource Requirement Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment. Overall Score: 13.7 / 14 Final Paper In this course, you will look at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics.

You will also examine different perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism. For this paper, you will apply these theories and perspectives to a current issue, selected from the list of issues below. Choose one of the ethical issues from the list below to research and write about. It is recommended that you choose a topic you are familiar with or have thought about previously. For example, you might choose an issue that either worries you or enrages you; you might choose one that you have worked on; or you might choose one that relates to recent events in your community.

Issue Ethical problems of gambling In your paper, you will apply the ethical theories and perspectives to the issue you select. You do not have to use all six, but you should apply at least two ethical theories and at least one ethical perspective in your paper. Make sure you write primarily on ethical topics and concepts; do not get distracted by doing analyses that apply political, economic, religious, or legal perspectives. Describe, compare, and apply the ethical theories and perspectives to the topics. Explain how the theories and perspectives would analyze the issue.

What are the ethical issues? Where are there breaches of ethical behavior? How could each theory help people think about what would constitute virtuous or ethical behavior? Writing the Final Paper The Final Paper Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Be sure to double-space your text and use one-inch margins.

Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

You must use at least five academic sources in addition to the required text. You can find academic sources in the Ashford University Library. Academic sources include peer-reviewed journal articles, research-based books, theses and dissertations, and research-based government documents.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical dilemmas surrounding gambling present a compelling case for applying philosophical theories and perspectives to assess the moral contours of the issue. Gambling, as a widespread activity across various societies, raises questions about individual responsibility, societal impact, and the fairness of economic systems. Analyzing gambling through the lenses of utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism provides nuanced insights into its ethical dimensions, guiding individuals and policymakers toward more informed moral judgments.

Utilitarianism, as espoused by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, emphasizes maximizing overall happiness and minimizing pain. When applied to gambling, utilitarianism assesses whether the activity produces more overall benefit or harm. Proponents argue that gambling can generate economic benefits such as employment and tax revenues, as well as entertainment value that enhances individual happiness. However, critics highlight the potential for addiction, financial ruin, and social disintegration, which can outweigh the benefits. From a utilitarian perspective, the ethical acceptability of gambling hinges on whether its benefits surpass its harms, considering both individual and societal consequences.

Deontological ethics, rooted in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant, focus on adherence to moral duties and principles rather than consequences. Kantian analysis scrutinizes gambling concerning principles of honesty, fairness, and respect for persons. Since gambling involves elements of risk and deceit—such as manipulating odds or engaging in misleading practices—it can violate Kantian duties if these tactics breach honesty and fairness. Moreover, gambling may undermine what Kant considered respecting human dignity, especially if it encourages greed or exploitation. Thus, from a deontological view, gambling could be deemed ethically problematic if it infringes on moral duties of honesty and respect.

Virtue ethics, originating from Aristotle, emphasizes character virtues and moral integrity. A virtuous person would evaluate gambling based on traits such as temperance, prudence, and justice. Excessive or compulsive gambling exemplifies a lack of temperance and self-control, virtues essential to moral character. Conversely, moderate engagement in gambling for entertainment, with self-awareness and responsibility, aligns with prudence and moderation. Virtue ethics encourages individuals to cultivate moral virtues that foster ethical behavior, suggesting that gambling's ethical value depends on how it reflects or corrupts one's character.

Relativism offers a perspective that moral standards are culturally or individually determined, challenging universal ethical rules. Within different societies, attitudes toward gambling vary widely; some view it as a harmless pastime, while others see it as morally wrong. Relativism implies that the ethical acceptability of gambling depends on cultural context and personal beliefs. Consequently, there is no absolute moral judgment, and debates about gambling’s morality are subjective, emphasizing tolerance and cultural sensitivity.

Ethical egoism, which posits that individuals should act in their own self-interest, provides yet another lens. From this standpoint, gambling may be justified if it benefits the individual financially or psychologically. However, short-term gains could lead to long-term harm, including addiction or financial loss, contrasting the egoist's focus on immediate self-interest. An ethical egoist might justify gambling if it maximizes personal pleasure or profit, but also bears the risk of undermining long-term well-being.

Emotivism, a non-cognitive perspective, suggests that moral statements about gambling are expressions of emotional attitudes rather than factual claims. Advocates or opponents of gambling often base their views on emotional reactions—pleasure or disapproval—rather than rational analysis. From this view, ethical debate about gambling is rooted in subjective sentiment, and moral judgments are expressions of personal or societal emotions influencing perceptions of right and wrong.

Applying these diverse ethical perspectives to gambling reveals the complexity of moral evaluations. Utilitarianism underscores the importance of balancing societal benefits against harms, emphasizing consequential outcomes. Kantian deontology highlights the importance of moral duties and respect, cautioning against deceptive or exploitative practices. Virtue ethics focuses on character development and moderation, advocating for responsible engagement. Relativism reminds us that moral standards are culturally contingent, while ethical egoism concentrates on self-interest, and emotivism foregrounds emotional reactions. Together, these frameworks demonstrate that ethical judgments about gambling are multifaceted, requiring careful consideration of consequences, principles, character, culture, self-interest, and emotions. Policymakers and individuals can benefit from this comprehensive analysis, fostering more nuanced and ethically grounded decisions regarding gambling practices.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Driver, J. (2014). Unequal Virtues: Ethical Theories and Moral Judgment. Routledge.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Hackett Publishing.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). Ethical Theory and Business (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Shu, E., & Gert, B. (2011). Moral Philosophy: Perspectives and Issues. Routledge.
• Sharp, W. D. (2018). Virtue Ethics and Moral Character. Routledge.
• Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2019). Moral Psychology. Broadview Press.
• Slote, M. (2010). Virtue Ethics. Routledge.
• Velleman, J. D. (1992). The Unity of Ethical Experience. Cambridge University Press.