Your First Initial Last Name Use A Title Page For Every Assi

Your First Initial Last Name 1use A Title Page For Every Assignment

Use a title page for every assignment in graduate school unless instructed otherwise. The pages that follow are provided to simplify the critique assignment. This is the title page format. Please provide a title of the assignment as follows:

Research critique assignment Student Name (s) BSN, RN NGR 5810 Section XX Date Dr. Diaz & Dr. Alfonso Graduate Faculty Florida International University Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences. Please read the pages from Polit and Beck (2021), pp. , and review the Boxes referred to in the tables' right column for additional clarification. The critique tables are complex, but the assignment has been simplified. Only use one of the tables—either a quantitative or qualitative checklist for each article.

Both are provided in this template. Summary: While you are expected to complete the checklist (3rd column) with a yes, no, unsure, or NA, comments are required, guided by information derived from each article being critiqued. Quantitative template (adapted from Polit & Beck, 2021, pp. ). *For the third column, Article Citation should precede each critique table using AMA format.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves critiquing a research article using a specified checklist for either quantitative or qualitative research. The critique requires careful examination of various components of the study, such as the title, abstract, problem statement, hypotheses, literature review, conceptual framework, ethical considerations, research design, sampling, data collection, analysis, findings, discussion, implications, and researcher credibility. Comments must be provided for each item, and the critique should assess the validity and relevance of the research within the context of nursing practice and scholarship.

The critique process involves detailed analysis of the article's methodological rigor, clarity, and alignment with research standards. For quantitative studies, focus includes whether statistical methods are appropriate and results are interpretable for practice. For qualitative studies, emphasis is on trustworthiness, thematic analysis, and contextual understanding. The ultimate goal is to determine the quality of the evidence and its applicability to nursing practice, supporting evidence-based decision-making.

All sources cited within the critique must be formatted in AMA style, and the critique should be approximately 1000 words, including at least ten credible references to support evaluation and interpretation. The critique must be objective, comprehensive, and demonstrate critical thinking about the research's strengths and limitations and its implications for clinical practice or further research.

References

• Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
• Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage Publications.
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications.
• LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2018). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice (9th ed.). Elsevier.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.