Your Initial Proposal: Address The Concerns

For Your Initial Proposal You Will Address the Concerns Present

For Your Initial Proposal You Will Address the Concerns Present

For your Initial Proposal, you will address the concerns presented in your selected case study from Week One and give recommendations for improvement. Utilize one of the following sample proposals to draft your Initial Proposal: Sample Proposal 1 (Minnesota Department of Public Health and Environment QI Project Proposal, n.d.) Sample Proposal 2 (TMIT Student Projects QuickStart Package TM, n.d.) Sample Proposal 3 (Harvard Neonatal-Perinatal Fellowship Training Program Quality and Safety Module, 2011) Sample Proposal 4 (Texas QIP, 2003).

Your Initial Proposal must include the following components:

  • Identify the needs that are present within your selected case study.
  • Explain each of the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful objectives for your selected case study.
  • Apply each of the SDLC phases as they relate to your study.
  • Demonstrate a clear understanding of HIT/QI acquisition by applying this in your Initial Proposal.

The Initial Proposal:

  • Must be three to four pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), double-spaced and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must follow one of the provided sample proposal guidelines: Sample Proposal 1, 2, 3, or 4.
  • Must include a title page with the following:
  • Title of paper
  • Student’s name
  • Course name and number
  • Instructor’s name
  • Date submitted

It must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.

It must address the topic of the paper with critical thought and end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.

Must use at least three scholarly sources, including a minimum of one from the Ashford University Library. All sources must be documented in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. A separate reference page formatted according to APA style must be included.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Healthcare quality improvement (QI) initiatives are vital in enhancing patient outcomes and operational efficiencies within healthcare systems. When selecting a case study for initial proposal development, it is imperative to critically analyze existing needs, establish measurable objectives, and apply structured process models such as the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC). This paper constructs a comprehensive initial proposal based on a selected case study from Week One, integrating these fundamental components to ensure a strategic approach aligned with healthcare informatics and quality improvement principles.

Needs Identification and Case Study Analysis

The selected case study revolves around a mid-sized community hospital facing challenges related to medication errors and adverse drug events. The needs identified include improving medication administration workflows, reducing error rates, and enhancing staff training and communication. These deficiencies contribute to compromised patient safety, increased readmissions, and elevated healthcare costs. Analyzing internal workflows, incident reports, and staff feedback underscores the necessity for a targeted intervention that leverages health information technology (HIT) to streamline medication processes and foster a culture of safety.

SMART and Meaningful Objectives

According to the Minnesota Department of Health (n.d.), SMART objectives are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. For this case study, the following objectives are proposed:

  • Specific: Implement an electronic medication administration record (eMAR) system to reduce medication errors.
  • Measurable: Achieve a 25% reduction in medication error rates within six months of implementation.
  • Achievable: Conduct staff training sessions and integrate the eMAR with existing electronic health records (EHRs).
  • Relevant: Address patient safety concerns related to medication administration errors.
  • Time-bound: Complete system deployment and staff training within three months, with evaluation at six months post-implementation.

This structured approach ensures that objectives remain focused, attainable, and aligned with the overarching goal of enhancing patient safety through targeted QI initiatives.

Application of SDLC Phases

1. Planning

The initial phase involves stakeholder engagement, including clinicians, IT staff, and administrators, to define project scope, identify resources, and develop a project charter. Key deliverables include needs assessment reports and a detailed project plan.

2. Analysis

During analysis, current medication administration workflows are mapped, problem areas identified, and system requirements documented. This phase emphasizes understanding user needs and clinical processes to inform system design.

3. Design

The design phase involves selecting or customizing an eMAR solution compatible with existing EHRs, creating user interface specifications, and planning workflows that minimize errors and enhance usability.

4. Development

Development includes configuring the eMAR system, developing interfaces, and preparing training materials. In this stage, technical testing and pilot runs are conducted to ensure system functionality and safety.

5. Implementation

Implementation entails deploying the system hospital-wide, providing comprehensive staff training, and establishing support channels to address issues promptly. Change management strategies are vital to promote staff buy-in.

6. Maintenance and Evaluation

Post-implementation monitoring is essential to evaluate system performance, error rate reductions, and user satisfaction. Feedback informs iterative improvements, ensuring sustained success of the quality initiative.

Health Information Technology (HIT) and Quality Improvement (QI) Acquisition

Effective HIT acquisition is critical in achieving QI objectives. The selection of an eMAR system should align with organizational goals, including interoperability, scalability, and compliance with health IT standards such as HL7 and FHIR. Acquiring HIT involves vendor assessment, system validation, data security considerations, and integration planning (HIMSS, 2021). Training healthcare staff on new technologies ensures that HIT effectively supports clinical workflows and quality metrics. Furthermore, leveraging data analytics capabilities allows continuous monitoring of patient safety indicators and supports data-driven decision-making in QI processes (Murdoch & Detsky, 2013).

Conclusion

This initial proposal sets a strategic foundation for addressing medication safety concerns within the selected hospital case study. By identifying critical needs, establishing SMART objectives, applying the SDLC framework, and emphasizing effective HIT acquisition, the initiative aims to foster safer medication practices and improve overall patient outcomes. Adherence to structured project management and health IT principles ensures that the intervention is feasible, sustainable, and aligned with organizational quality goals. Future phases will involve detailed implementation, evaluation, and continuous improvement efforts, contributing to a culture of safety and excellence in healthcare delivery.

References

  • HIMSS. (2021). Health Information Technology (HIT) Acquisition and Implementation. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. https://www.himss.org
  • Murdoch, T. B., & Detsky, A. S. (2013). The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA, 309(13), 1351–1352. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.393
  • Minnesota Department of Health. (n.d.). SMART Objectives for Quality Improvement: A Guide. https://www.health.state.mn.us
  • Joint Commission. (2020). Measures to Reduce Medication Errors. Sentinel Event Data. https://www.jointcommission.org
  • Classen, D. C., et al. (2011). Building safer systems: A sourcebook for hospitals. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ahrq.gov
  • O’Connor, P., et al. (2019). Implementing electronic medication administration records: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1359-4
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2022). Hospital Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. https://www.cms.gov
  • Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0693
  • World Health Organization. (2019). Medication safety in health care. https://www.who.int
  • Leape, L. L., et al. (2009). Transforming healthcare: A systems approach. BMJ Quality & Safety, 18(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.028490

Related Assignments