Your Paper Has To Be Under 20% Of Quoting To Be Accepted

Your Paper Has To Be Under 20 Of Quoting To Be Accepted Try To

Your paper has to be under 20% of quoting to be accepted. Your employer, a manufacturer of office chairs, asks you to determine the optimal order quantity for two suppliers of coil springs. The manufacturing facility operates 50 weeks a year and requires a steady supply of 1,000 coil springs per week. You are provided with specific costs associated with each supplier, including purchase price, setup charges, and inventory carrying costs. The assignment involves calculating the optimal order quantities for both suppliers, explaining the assumptions involved (particularly starting with zero inventory), and discussing the implications of maintaining or not maintaining zero inventory in business operations. The paper should be two to three double-spaced pages, formatted according to APA style, including a title page, proper citations, and references.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Determining the optimal order quantity is a crucial aspect of inventory management, aimed at minimizing total costs associated with ordering and holding inventory. For manufacturers and supply chain managers, understanding how to calculate these quantities can lead to significant cost savings and efficiency improvements. This paper examines the calculation of optimal order quantities for two coil spring suppliers, considering various costs, and discusses the importance of inventory levels, particularly starting with zero inventory, in the context of business operations.

Calculation of Optimal Order Quantity for Supplier A

The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model is an essential tool used in inventory management to determine the ideal order size that minimizes total inventory costs. The EOQ formula is given by:

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2DS}{H}} \]

where:

- \(D\) is the annual demand,

- \(S\) is the setup or order cost,

- \(H\) is the holding or carrying cost per unit per year.

For Supplier A, the data provided are:

- Weekly demand: 1,000 springs,

- Number of operational weeks per year: 50,

- Annual demand \(D\) = 1,000 springs/week \(\times\) 50 weeks = 50,000 springs,

- Purchase price per spring: $1,

- Sale price per spring: $4,

- Setup cost \(S\): $20 per order,

- Carrying cost rate: 25%.

The inventory carrying cost per unit per year \(H\) is calculated as:

\[ H = \text{Purchase price} \times \text{Carrying cost rate} = 1 \times 0.25 = \$0.25 \]

Applying the EOQ formula:

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 50,000 \times 20}{0.25}} \]

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2,000,000}{0.25}} \]

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{8,000,000} \]

\[ EOQ \approx 2828.43 \]

Thus, the optimal order quantity for Supplier A is approximately 2,828 springs.

The calculation demonstrates that ordering 2,828 springs each time minimizes the combined costs of ordering and holding inventory, assuming demand and costs remain constant.

Calculation of Optimal Order Quantity for Supplier B

For Supplier B, the costs are slightly different:

- Cost per spring: $2,

- Setup charge: $10,

- All other variables remain the same.

Recalculating \(H\):

\[ H = 2 \times 0.25 = \$0.50 \]

Applying the EOQ formula:

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times 50,000 \times 10}{0.50}} \]

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{\frac{1,000,000}{0.50}} \]

\[ EOQ = \sqrt{2,000,000} \]

\[ EOQ \approx 1414.21 \]

The optimal order quantity for Supplier B is approximately 1,414 springs. This smaller EOQ compared to Supplier A reflects the lower setup cost but a higher per-unit cost, influencing the size of the ideal order.

Discussion on Zero Inventory Balance and Business Implications

Starting with a zero inventory balance is a theoretical assumption that simplifies calculations but often does not align with practical business operations. Maintaining zero inventory means that a company orders and receives stock only when needed, with no buffer stock stored in inventory. While this approach has advantages, there are several considerations regarding its desirability.

Benefits of Zero Inventory:

First, having zero inventory reduces carrying costs significantly. Inventory storage involves costs related to warehousing, insurance, depreciation, and obsolescence. Eliminating stock reduces these expenses, thereby improving cash flow and potentially increasing profitability (Cairns, 2020). Second, a zero-inventory strategy aligns with Just-in-Time (JIT) inventory systems, which aim to increase operational efficiency by receiving goods only as needed in the production process (Ohno, 1988). Third, reducing inventory minimizes the risk of excess stock, which can become obsolete or spoil, especially in industries dealing with perishable goods (Chong et al., 2020).

Risks and Challenges of Zero Inventory:

However, maintaining zero inventory carries risks, notably stockouts and production delays. If demand suddenly spikes or supply chain disruptions occur, the firm might face shortages that halt operations or reduce customer satisfaction. Safety stock—additional inventory held to mitigate demand variability—is often maintained precisely to offset these risks (Silver et al., 1998). Without safety stock, companies are vulnerable to unforeseen events, which may lead to lost sales and damaged reputation.

Other Considerations:

While low inventory levels reduce costs, they can also increase ordering frequency and administrative costs. Frequent ordering might lead to higher setup costs monthly or weekly, potentially offsetting inventory savings. Moreover, some industries or products necessitate higher inventory levels for quality assurance or customer service reasons (Nahmias, 2013). For instance, seasonal businesses might need surplus stock to prepare for peak demand periods.

In conclusion, zero inventory balance is generally not universally desirable due to the associated risks. The optimal strategy often involves balancing lean inventory with safety stock to manage demand uncertainty while minimizing costs. The decision hinges on specific industry characteristics, supply chain reliability, and customer service priorities.

Conclusion

Calculating the economic order quantity for different suppliers enables manufacturing firms to optimize their inventory costs effectively. The EOQ model highlights how order size influences total costs, balancing ordering and holding expenses. While starting with zero inventory simplifies calculations and minimizes carrying costs, practical considerations—such as demand variability and supply chain risks—necessitate maintaining a safety buffer. Therefore, effective inventory management requires a strategic balance that accounts for cost minimization and service level objectives, emphasizing the importance of flexible and context-specific policies.

References

• Cairns, S. (2020). Inventory Management Strategies. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(3), 45-60.
• Chong, V., Reid, P., & Pang, V. (2020). Managing Obsolete Inventory in Retail. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(4), 356-374.
• Nahmias, S. (2013). Production and Operations Analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press.
• Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Thomas, R. (1998). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling. Wiley.