Your Submission Must Be Your Original Work No More Than A Co

Your Submission Must Be Your Original Work No More Than A Combined To

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect.

The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. A. Examine a healthcare organization that has significance to you, using the American Hospital Directory (AHD) and the Care Compare websites found in the Web Links section, and complete the following: 1. Identify the healthcare organization you selected from the AHD by name and location. 2. Explain why you chose the healthcare organization in part A1 and any significance the organization has to you, including specific examples. 3. Describe (suggested length 1–2 paragraphs) the healthcare organization from A1 and the “type of facility” it is, according to AHD website, and the types of services this kind of facility typically provides. a. Explain what the “type of control”, according to AHD website, means for this healthcare organization identified in part A1 and how it informs the services typically provided at this healthcare organization. 4. Discuss the facility’s Overall Star Rating from the Care Compare website and identify how the Star Rating is measured. If the facility does not have an Overall Star Rating explain why. a. Identify one credible additional source of quality data on healthcare organizations. 5. Discuss two organizational ethics that are reflected in the type of facility and the type of control listed for this organization, including specific examples. 6. Discuss the nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility for this type of organization related to value-based care, including specific examples. 7. Describe one healthcare organizational change that could improve the delivery of value-based healthcare for the healthcare organization from part A1. B. Compare the financial structure and data of the healthcare organization you discussed in part A with another organization listed on the AHD and Care Compare websites that is within the same or an adjacent state, including specific examples from each healthcare organization. 1. Discuss which healthcare organization from part B is more aligned with value-based healthcare, including one scholarly evidence source published within the last five years to support the discussion. 2. Discuss which healthcare organization from part B is more supportive of equitable patient-centered care, including one scholarly evidence source published within the last five years to support the discussion. 3. Discuss one financial and one quality data source that could inform organizational transformation in any healthcare organization. C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. (American Hospital Directory) (Care Compare) Grading Rubric A1:HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATION SIGNIFICANCE Not Evident: The submission does not identify a healthcare facility. Approaching Competence: The submission is missing the healthcare facility’s name or location, or the organization is not selected from the AHD website. Competent: The submission identifies the healthcare facility by the organization’s name and location, and the organization is selected from the AHD website. A2:SIGNIFICANCE OF FACILITY Not Evident: The submission does not explain why the healthcare organization identified in part A1 was chosen. Approaching Competence: The submission is missing the explanation of the organization’s significance or lacks specific examples. Competent: The submission explains why the healthcare organization identified in part A1 was chosen and any significance it has to the learner, supported with specific examples. A3:TYPE OF FACILITY Not Evident: A description of the organization from part A1 is not provided. Approaching Competence: The description is inaccurate or does not include the “type of facility” or typical services. Competent: The description accurately details the organization, including the “type of facility” and the typical services provided. A3a:TYPE OF CONTROL Not Evident: The explanation of “type of control” is missing. Approaching Competence: The explanation does not logically clarify what “type of control” means or how it influences services. Competent: The explanation clearly describes “type of control” and how it informs service delivery. A4:OVERALL STAR RATING Not Evident: The discussion about the Star Rating or relevant measures is missing. Approaching Competence: The discussion about the Star Rating or its measures is not logical or accurate. Competent: The discussion logically explains the Star Rating, what it signifies for the facility, and correctly identifies relevant measures. A4a:Source of Quality Data Not Evident: No credible source of quality data is identified. Approaching Competence: A credible source is identified but not convincingly. Competent: A credible additional source of quality data is identified. A5:Organizational Ethics Not Evident: No ethics are discussed. Approaching Competence: Only one ethics or ethics that are implausible or unsupported are discussed. Competent: Two plausible organizational ethics are discussed, supported by specific examples. A6:Nursing Role in Value-Based Care Not Evident: The nurse’s role in fiscal responsibility is not discussed. Approaching Competence: The role is not clearly linked to value-based care or lacks specific examples. Competent: The nurse’s role is logically discussed, with specific examples related to value-based care. A7:Organizational Change for Value-Based Healthcare Not Evident: No change is described. Approaching Competence: The change described is irrelevant or implausible. Competent: A relevant, plausible organizational change that could improve value-based healthcare delivery is described. B:Compare Financial Structures Not Evident: No comparison is provided. Approaching Competence: The comparison is inaccurate or lacks specific examples. Competent: The comparison is accurate, logical, includes the organization names and specific examples. B1:Alignment with Value-Based Healthcare Not Evident: No discussion supported by evidence. Approaching Competence: The discussion lacks relevance or supporting evidence. Competent: The discussion is supported with relevant scholarly evidence. B2:Equitable Patient-Centered Care Not Evident: No discussion. Approaching Competence: The discussion lacks relevance or supporting evidence. Competent: The discussion is relevant and supported with scholarly evidence. B3:Sources to Inform Organizational Transformation Not Evident: No sources are discussed. Approaching Competence: Only one source is discussed or sources are implausible. Competent: Both financial and quality data sources are discussed, relevant for transformation. C:Sources Not Evident: No citations or references are provided. Approaching Competence: Citations and references are incomplete or inaccurate. Competent: Proper in-text citations and accurate references are provided.