A Project Plan Cannot Be Considered Complete Until Resources

A Project Plan Cannot Be Considered Complete Until The Resources Have

Assign resources to tasks, print the resource sheet, identify over-allocated resources, and print the Gantt chart and entry table. Generate reports showing resource costs and costs by work package, and evaluate if these costs fit within the scope statement's budget. Level the project within available slack and print the updated entry table. Reassess resource over-allocations; if over-allocated resources persist, clear the leveling, re-level without slack constraints, and determine the impacts on project duration and completion date. Consider strategies to complete the project on time, including adding a new resource at 1.5 times the normal cost. Calculate the additional resource's cost and the total project cost, and evaluate if this is within the scope statement's budget. If sources choose not to add resources, assess whether a delay in project completion is acceptable, providing justification. Document all actions, decisions, and outcomes using MS Project printouts, indicating corresponding steps. Summarize final time and cost results, and analyze their alignment with the scope statement. If necessary, describe proposed changes to the scope statement, explaining why modifications are needed, and include both original and revised scope statements in the deliverables.

Paper For Above instruction

The management of project resources is a fundamental aspect of successful project planning and execution. A project plan cannot be deemed complete until all resources—including human, material, and financial—are accurately assigned, leveled, and within budget constraints. This process ensures that tasks are adequately staffed and scheduled, preventing over-allocation and enabling timely project completion. The following discussion delineates the steps involved in resource allocation, leveling, cost evaluation, and management strategies to adhere to scope and schedule constraints, illustrated through the use of MS Project.

Resource Assignment and Initial Planning

Initial resource assignment is the cornerstone of effective project management. Utilizing MS Project, the first step involves assigning resources to each task based on the required skills and availability. This process requires an in-depth understanding of the resource pool, workloads, and project requirements. Once resources are allocated, a resource sheet is generated to provide a comprehensive overview of resource names, types, costs, and availability. This step lays the foundation for further analysis, ensuring that resource assignments align with the project workload and planned schedule.

Following assignment, the project manager must identify over-allocated resources—those scheduled to work more hours than are available within a given period. MS Project offers the functionality to visualize over-allocation through resource usage views, enabling prompt adjustments. The project team then examines task durations and dependencies, aligning them with resource capacity to prevent conflicts and optimize resource utilization.

Cost Estimation and Budget Evaluation

Accurate cost estimation is vital to project success. Cost reports generated from MS Project detail individual resource costs and total expenditures by work package. Comparing these costs with the preliminary scope statement budget determines whether the project remains financially feasible. If projected costs exceed the budget, project managers must explore options to reduce expenses or re-evaluate scope parameters. In this case, the project is leveled within available slack—extra time built into the schedule—allowing tasks to be rescheduled without extending the overall project duration.

This scheduling flexibility helps accommodate resource constraints, but it may involve trade-offs in task sequencing and peak resource utilization. The updated entry table reflects these adjustments, showcasing realistic work allocations and costs aligned with the project scope.

Re-leveling and Managing Over-allocations

Despite initial leveling, persistent over-allocations may necessitate re-leveling the project without the slack constraint. This approach can shorten project duration but may increase resource conflicts and workload intensities. By re-leveling without slack, the project team assesses the impact on the project timeline. The resulting schedule may reveal a potential delay or acceleration, depending on resource availability and task dependencies. The team then evaluates whether compressing the schedule is feasible—considering the risk of burnout or compromised quality—and whether the remaining over-allocations are manageable.

If over-allocations persist, the team considers alternative strategies, such as adding extra resources or adjusting task priorities, to meet deadlines without overburdening existing personnel.

Adding Resources versus Overtime: Cost and Schedule Implications

One strategy to mitigate schedule delays involves adding new resources at a cost 1.5 times higher than standard labor costs. Calculating this additional expense entails multiplying the base hourly rate of the resource by 1.5 and summing over the required hours. This increased expenditure must then be evaluated against the original project budget to determine fiscal feasibility.

If the revised total cost with added resources remains within the scope statement's allocated budget, this approach ensures project completion within schedule constraints. Conversely, if the cost exceeds the budget, alternative approaches such as overtime, scope reduction, or schedule delay must be considered. Overtime, while cost-effective short-term, may impact quality and team morale, and a decision regarding acceptable delays depends on project stakeholder priorities and contractual terms.

Documentation and Final Reporting

Throughout the process, meticulous documentation is essential. MS Project printouts serve as visual and quantitative evidence of resource assignments, leveling adjustments, cost calculations, and schedule impacts. These are annotated to indicate their supporting steps, providing transparency and accountability.

The final project report includes an analysis of whether project objectives—defined in the scope statement—are met within the stipulated time and budget. If modifications to scope are necessary, the rationale is documented, along with revised scope statements, ensuring alignment with stakeholder expectations and project capabilities.

In conclusion, Agile or traditional project management methodologies underscore the importance of resource leveling, cost control, and flexible scheduling to successfully deliver projects. The effective use of MS Project tools facilitates these processes, empowering project managers to make informed decisions, mitigate risks, and meet project objectives efficiently.

References

• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th Edition). Project Management Institute.
• Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2018). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2014). Project Management: A Managerial Approach. Wiley.
• Harris, F., & McKellar, K. (2009). The Practical Guide to Project Management Scheduling. CRC Press.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Project Management.com. (2020). Resource Leveling Techniques in MS Project. Retrieved from https://www.projectmanagement.com
• Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management Jumpstart. Wiley.
• Gido, J., & Clements, J. P. (2015). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Shtub, A., Bard, J. F., & Lapierre, S. D. (2014). Project Management: Engineering, Technology, and Implementation. Prentice Hall.