A Stream Containing 4 Wt% Chromium Cr Is Contained In The Wa

1a Stream Containing 4wt Chromium Cr Is Contained In The Wastewat

A wastewater treatment process involving a chromium-containing stream from a finishing plant is analyzed. The process includes a treatment unit that removes 95% of the chromium from the wastewater and recycles it, with excess wastewater bypassing the unit if flow rates exceed capacity. The objective is to create a process flowchart, perform calculations for various wastewater flow rates, and plot the relationship between flow rate and chromium concentration in the waste lagoon.

Paper For Above instruction

The treatment of wastewater containing hexavalent chromium (Cr) emissions from finishing operations is critical due to the hazardous nature of chromium compounds and their environmental impact. In this context, it is essential to understand the flow dynamics and contaminant removal efficiency in order to design an effective treatment system. The process involves a stream rich in chromium, a treatment unit with specific capacity and removal efficiency, and the handling of excess wastewater, which bypasses the treatment and is discharged directly into a waste lagoon. This paper aims to construct a process flowchart and perform quantitative analysis based on given parameters, specifically determining the chromium concentration and flow rate variances across a range of wastewater inlet rates, and subsequently graphing these relationships for process optimization.

Flowchart of the Process

The flowchart begins with the wastewater stream emerging from the finishing plant, containing 4 wt% chromium. This stream enters a treatment unit with a maximum capacity of 4500 kg/hr. The flow at the inlet can vary between 1000 kg/hr and 10,000 kg/hr. When the wastewater flow exceeds this capacity, the excess (beyond 4500 kg/hr) bypasses the treatment unit and is directly combined with the treated water discharge. The treatment unit removes 95% of the chromium from the portion of wastewater it receives, and the remaining residual liquid, which still contains some chromium, is sent to a waste lagoon for disposal. The recycled chromium-rich stream from the treatment unit is returned to the process, closing the loop.

In graphical form, the process involves (1) an inlet flow with variable rate, (2) a division point where flows either pass through the treatment unit or bypass, (3) the treatment unit itself, and (4) the combined output sent to the waste lagoon. Dependence on flow rates influences the amount of chromium reaching the lagoon, which is crucial for environmental compliance and process control.

Calculation of Flow Rates and Chromium Concentrations

To analyze the system, several steps are undertaken:

1. Determine the proportion of wastewater treated versus bypassed based on total flow rate.
2. Calculate the chromium removed by the treatment unit, and establish the chromium concentration in the residual liquid after treatment.
3. Estimate the total liquid flow to the lagoon, combining treated residuals and bypassed flows.
4. Calculate the chromium mass fraction in the combined lagoon discharge.

Assuming the inlet flow rate (Q_in) varies from 1000 kg/hr to 10,000 kg/hr in 1000 kg/hr increments, the calculations are as follows:

Case 1: Q_in ≤ 4500 kg/hr

- Entire flow passes through the treatment unit.

- Chromium in inlet: 4 wt%.

- Chromium mass flow in inlet: (Q_in) × 0.04.

- Chromium removed: 95% of the chromium present (0.95 × original chromium mass flow).

- Chromium remaining in residual: 5% of original chromium mass flow.

- Liquid discharged to lagoon: Q_in, with residual chromium concentration: (remaining chromium) / Q_in.

Case 2: Q_in > 4500 kg/hr

- Flow through treatment: 4500 kg/hr.

- Excess bypass flow: (Q_in - 4500) kg/hr.

- Chromium in inlet (treating some of the chromium): 4 wt%, so initial chromium content is (4500 kg/hr × 0.04) = 180 kg Cr/hr.

- Chromium removed in treatment: 95% of 180 kg = 171 kg Cr/hr.

- Chromium remaining after treatment: 9 kg Cr/hr.

- Bypassed flow: (Q_in - 4500) kg/hr, with 4% chromium: (Q_in - 4500) × 0.04 kg Cr.

- Total Chromium in lagoon: residual chromium in treated flow + chromium in bypass flow.

- Total liquid flow to lagoon: residual flow (treatment residual) plus bypass flow.

The calculations for each flow rate point allow for plotting the relationship between the flow rate to the lagoon and the chromium concentration in the lagoon. The resulting graph illustrates how increased inlet flow rates reduce the chromium removal efficiency proportionally, leading to higher chromium concentrations in the waste lagoon. This informs process optimization to minimize environmental impact while managing operational constraints.

Graphical Analysis

Using spreadsheet software like Excel or MATLAB, the calculated data points are plotted with flow rate (kg/hr) on the x-axis and the chromium mass fraction on the y-axis. The plot typically exhibits a flat region where the flow is ≤4500 kg/hr (max treatment capacity), with a constant chromium concentration, followed by an increasing trend as flow exceeds capacity due to the bypass of untreated wastewater. This visual aids in understanding the trade-offs in operational flow rates and chromium emissions.

Conclusion

Efficient wastewater management for chromium involves balancing treatment capacity with process flow rates. The process flowchart and associated calculations provide vital insights into how flow rates influence the chromium load in the waste lagoon. Understanding these relationships ensures environmental compliance, optimal operation, and informed decision-making regarding system design and operational limits. Proper process control measures, such as flow regulation or capacity enhancements, could mitigate chromium release into the environment, reducing ecological and health risks associated with chromium pollution.

References

• Metcalf & Eddy. (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hvitved-Jacobsen, T., et al. (2013). Sewer Processes: Development, Design, and Operation. CRC Press.
• APHA. (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association.
• G. Tchobanoglous, F. L. Burton, & H. D. Stensel. (2003). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. McGraw-Hill.
• Reynolds, C. (2002). Environmental Chemistry. Wiley.
• Holsen, T. M. (2003). Environmental Chemistry. CRC Press.
• U.S. EPA. (1992). Design Manual: Wastewater Treatment for Small Communities. EPA 625-R-92-002.
• Henze, M., et al. (2008). Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes. Springer.
• Robinson, J. A., & Tchobanoglous, G. (2003). Fundamentals of wastewater treatment. CRC Press.
• Chen, C. W. (2011). Environmental Law and Policy. Routledge.