An Accounting Professional Requires At Least Two Skill Sets

An Accounting Professional Requires At Least Two Skill Sets The First

An accounting professional requires at least two skill sets. The first is to be technically competent. Knowing how to capture, manage, and report information is a necessary skill. Second, the ability to assess manager and employee actions and biases for accounting analysis is another skill. For instance, knowing how a person is compensated helps anticipate information biases.

Background: Assume that your company sells portable housing to both general contractors and the government. It sells jobs to contractors on a bid basis. A contractor asks for three bids from different manufacturers. The combination of low bid and high quality wins the job. However, jobs sold to the government are bid on a cost-plus basis.

This means price is determined by adding all costs plus a profit based on cost at a specified percent, such as 10%. You observe that the amount of overhead allocated to government jobs is higher than that allocated to contract jobs. These allocations concern you.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of construction and manufacturing industries, accurately allocating costs and understanding stakeholder perspectives are crucial for ethical financial reporting and decision-making. The scenario presented involves analyzing cost allocations for portable housing sold to different clients—general contractors and the government—highlighting key ethical considerations and offering strategic recommendations for corporate financial officers.

Stakeholders Involved

The primary stakeholders in this situation encompass several groups. Firstly, the company’s management and financial officers are responsible for overseeing cost allocation practices and ensuring ethical standards. Second, shareholders and investors rely on accurate financial statements that reflect true costs and profitability, influencing their investment decisions. Customers, whether general contractors or government agencies, depend on transparent billing and fair pricing. Third, the government agencies involved are stakeholders, given their oversight role and interest in fair bidding processes. Finally, employees and auditors who manage or verify cost data also hold stake, especially when ethical integrity is challenged.

Ethical Issues in Cost Allocation

The core ethical dilemma summarized here revolves around the potential misallocation of overhead costs to influence perceived profitability on government versus contractor jobs. An imbalance where higher overhead is allocated to government contracts might artificially inflate costs, reducing reported profit margins—potentially to the company’s advantage or as a result of systematic bias. Misrepresenting costs violates principles of transparency and honesty outlined in accounting ethics codes such as those from the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

Moreover, such practices may distort financial statements, mislead stakeholders, and compromise the integrity of financial reporting. The bias in overhead allocations could also be influenced by managerial incentives to appear less profitable on government contracts or to inflate costs for strategic reasons—raising concerns about manipulation or ethical misconduct.

Another ethical concern involves the bidding process itself. Since government projects are bid on a cost-plus basis, there is an ethical obligation to report costs accurately, ensuring that the government is not overcharged. Overstating costs to obtain higher overhead recovery would be considered fraudulent and unethical.

Recommendations to the Financial Officer

Given these ethical considerations, the financial officer must prioritize transparency, accuracy, and compliance with accounting standards. Firstly, conduct a thorough review of the overhead allocation methodology. This process should ensure that all overhead costs are allocated consistently and in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Implementing activity-based costing (ABC) can offer finer granularity and more precise allocations that reflect actual consumption of overhead resources by different jobs.

Secondly, establish and enforce strict internal controls and audit procedures to detect and prevent biased or unjustified cost allocations. Regular internal audits and independent third-party audits can help verify the integrity of the costing process and reinforce accountability among staff responsible for cost reporting.

Thirdly, provide comprehensive training to managerial and accounting staff on ethical standards and the importance of truthful reporting. Encouraging a corporate culture rooted in integrity can mitigate the risks of intentional misallocation or manipulation of costs.

Furthermore, transparency in financial disclosures should be prioritized. This includes clearly documenting the basis for cost allocations and providing detailed notes in financial reports. Transparency not only aligns with regulatory requirements but also builds trust among stakeholders, including government agencies and investors.

Finally, the company should consider revising its overhead allocation policies to prevent systematic bias. For example, overreliance on arbitrary allocation bases should be replaced with more objective, activity-based measures. This alignment leads to more equitable and ethically sound financial reporting, fostering long-term sustainability and stakeholder confidence.

In conclusion, ethical financial management benefits the company by enhancing reputation, ensuring compliance with regulations, and maintaining stakeholder trust. The financial officer's proactive role in scrutinizing, refining, and transparently communicating cost allocation practices is indispensable in maintaining integrity in financial reporting and fostering sustainable business operations.

References

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2020). Code of Professional Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.aicpa.org/research/standards/codeofconduct.html
• International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). (2018). International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) Code of Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/IESBA-Code-of-Ethics-2018.pdf
• Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., Stratton, W. O., Burgstahler, D., & Schatzberg, J. (2019). Introduction to Management Accounting. Pearson.
• Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2020). Comparative International Accounting. Pearson.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (2018). Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson.
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2019). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2020). Financial & Managerial Accounting. Wiley.
• Revsine, L., Collins, W. J., Johnson, K., & Mittelstaedt, F. H. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis. Pearson.
• Zeff, S. A. (2003). How the U.S. Accounting Profession Got Where It Is Today: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 67-81.
• Gaa, J. C., & Thorne, L. (2016). Toward a Framework for Ethical Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 265-279.