Analyze How The Four Steps Of The Control Process And Explai

Analyze How The Four Steps Of The Control Process And Explain How Each

Analyze how the four steps of the control process and explain how each step contributes to the control function. Describe the three types of controls. How can the effectiveness of controls be assessed in an organization? Is this assessment different for a global organization? Bierman, L., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2016). Management: Principles and applications, custom edition [Electronic version]. Solon, OH: Academic Media Solutions. Job, A. (2012, December 21). Operational plan . Entrepreneur . Retrieved from

Paper For Above instruction

The control process is an essential management function that ensures organizational activities align with established objectives and plans. Effective control mechanisms enable managers to monitor performance, identify deviations, and implement corrective actions proactively. The process typically comprises four key steps: establishing standards, measuring actual performance, comparing performance against standards, and taking corrective actions. Each of these steps plays a vital role in maintaining organizational efficiency and effectiveness.

Step 1: Establishing Standards

The first step in the control process involves setting performance standards that serve as benchmarks. These standards can be quantitative, such as sales targets or production quotas, or qualitative, like customer satisfaction levels. Clear, specific, and measurable standards are crucial because they provide a basis for evaluating performance objectively. For instance, a manufacturing company might establish a standard of producing 10,000 units per month, which guides subsequent performance assessments. Well-defined standards contribute to clarity and focus within the organization, aligning employee activities with strategic goals.

Step 2: Measuring Actual Performance

The second step involves collecting data to assess actual performance. Accurate measurement is essential for meaningful comparison against standards. Methods include performance reports, direct observation, technological assessments, and customer feedback. Reliability in measurement tools and processes ensures that the data accurately reflects performance levels. For example, in a service organization, customer satisfaction surveys can provide insights into service quality. Precise measurement enables managers to identify performance gaps effectively.

Step 3: Comparing Performance Against Standards

In the third step, managers compare the measured performance with established standards to detect deviations. Variance analysis helps in quantifying the differences and determining their significance. If performance falls short of standards, it indicates a problem requiring attention. Conversely, performance exceeding standards could suggest opportunities for further optimization. This comparison provides the basis for decision-making, highlighting areas that need improvement or reinforcement. Effective comparison requires timely data processing and comprehension of performance metrics.

Step 4: Taking Corrective Actions

The final step involves implementing corrective measures to address performance deviations. This could include training, reallocating resources, process adjustments, or strategic changes. Corrective actions aim to realign operations with standards, ensuring objectives are achieved. For example, if production shortfalls occur, a manager might investigate supply chain issues and seek alternative suppliers or process improvements. The effectiveness of these actions depends on timely intervention and managerial responsiveness. Continuous monitoring ensures that corrective measures lead to sustained performance improvements.

Contribution of Each Step to the Control Function

Each step in the control process enhances organizational performance by creating a feedback loop that fosters continuous improvement. Establishing standards clarifies expectations; measuring performance provides factual data; comparing performance identifies gaps; and corrective actions ensure adjustments are made. Together, they foster accountability and proactive management, reducing inefficiencies and enhancing goal achievement.

The Three Types of Controls

Management control systems can be categorized into three types: strategic controls, operational controls, and financial controls. Strategic controls focus on the organization's long-term goals, assessing whether strategies are effectively implemented in changing environments. Operational controls monitor day-to-day activities to ensure processes are performed correctly and efficiently. Financial controls involve budgetary and financial performance measures to prevent resource wastage and ensure fiscal responsibility. Each type of control serves specific functions, but all are integral to comprehensive organizational management.

Assessing Control Effectiveness

The effectiveness of controls can be assessed through several criteria such as accuracy, timeliness, relevance, and the degree to which they prompt corrective actions. Performance metrics and feedback mechanisms help evaluate if controls are meeting their objectives. Regular audits, inspections, and performance reviews also contribute to assessment. Effective controls should identify issues promptly, support decision-making, and lead to performance improvements. In addition, employee feedback and organizational learning strengthen control systems over time.

Control Assessment in a Global Organization

Assessing control effectiveness in a global organization presents additional challenges due to geographical dispersion, cultural differences, and varying regulatory environments. International controls must account for different compliance standards, time zones, and languages. The complexity necessitates adaptable and culturally sensitive control systems. Technology plays a crucial role in integrating global performance data and enabling real-time monitoring across borders. Therefore, while the fundamental principles of control assessment remain consistent, their implementation must be tailored to the specific context of a multinational enterprise.

Conclusion

The four-step control process—standards setting, performance measurement, comparison, and corrective action—is fundamental to effective management. Each step contributes to ensuring organizational goals are met efficiently. Recognizing the different types of controls and assessing their effectiveness are equally vital for maintaining organizational health. In a global context, these processes require additional considerations but remain anchored in core management principles. Ultimately, robust control systems empower organizations to adapt and thrive in dynamic environments, both locally and internationally.

References

  • Bierman, L., Ferrell, O. C., & Ferrell, L. (2016). Management: Principles and applications. Solon, OH: Academic Media Solutions.
  • Job, A. (2012, December 21). Operational plan. Entrepreneur. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management control systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation, and incentives. Pearson.
  • Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
  • Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system "balance": The impact of strategy and organizational structure on perceived effectiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 187-213.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press.