Answer The Below Questions In 250 Words Each Applied Busines

Answer The Below Questions In 250 Words Eachapplied Business Ethics1

Answer the below questions in 250 words each. Applied Business Ethics 1)What aspects of the UN Declaration of Human Rights are unrealistic today? (250 Words) 2)Are the best places to work the most profitable? Are they the most ethical? (250 Words) Human Resource Management 3)Alfie Kohn and Mark Stiffler have very different views of the effectiveness of incentive programs. Which do you think makes the most sense? Why? (250 Words) 4)Mello elaborates on why employees join unions. What are other considerations that may influence employees to join a union? With unionization on the downturn, why should an organization be concerned about labor relations? (250 Words) 5)The federal government seems to be actively involved in discussions regarding executive pay and the rights/obligations of shareholders concerning this topic. Should this area of private sector commerce be regulated by government? (250 Words)

Paper For Above instruction

The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted in 1948, laid a foundational framework for universal human rights, emphasizing freedoms such as speech, assembly, and equality. However, many aspects of the UDHR are increasingly viewed as unrealistic in today’s global context. One significant issue is the declaration's aspirational tone versus practical enforcement. Many nations lack the political will, or capacity, to uphold these rights uniformly, especially in authoritarian regimes where dissent is suppressed or human rights abuses are overlooked. Additionally, cultural and economic differences complicate the application of certain rights; for instance, concepts like freedom of speech or gender equality may conflict with traditional societal norms in some countries. The emphasis on absolute rights also neglects the pragmatic limitations nations face, such as resource constraints, poverty, or ongoing conflicts, which hinder full realization of these ideals. Furthermore, the rapid pace of technological advancements presents challenges, such as digital privacy concerns, that were not envisioned at the time of the declaration. International enforcement is weak, and conflicting interests among nations often impede global consensus. Overall, while the UDHR provides an essential moral blueprint, its implementation faces significant obstacles due to political, cultural, economic, and technological realities, rendering some aspects overly idealistic in today’s complex international landscape.

When considering workplaces, profitability and ethics are often examined as intertwined yet distinct concepts. The most profitable companies are not always the most ethical, and vice versa. Profitability is driven primarily by efficiency, cost-cutting, and market dominance, which can sometimes lead to ethical compromises such as exploitation of labor, environmental degradation, or deceptive marketing. For example, some corporations have prioritized shareholder returns over worker safety or environmental sustainability, ultimately risking reputational damage and long-term financial harm. Conversely, companies that prioritize ethics often foster trust, customer loyalty, and a strong corporate social responsibility (CSR) reputation—all of which can translate into sustainable profits. Ethical workplaces tend to attract motivated employees and loyal customers, reducing turnover and marketing costs. However, pursuing strict ethical standards may sometimes involve higher short-term costs, such as investing in environmentally friendly technologies or fair labor practices, which could reduce immediate profits. Therefore, while profitability and ethics are not mutually exclusive, aligning them requires thoughtful leadership that recognizes ethical practices as investments rather than costs. Ultimately, the best organizations strive to integrate ethical principles into their business models, leading to sustainable profitability that benefits all stakeholders.

Alfie Kohn and Mark Stiffler present contrasting views on incentive programs. Kohn criticizes traditional incentives, arguing that they often undermine intrinsic motivation and foster unethical behavior, such as cheating or dishonesty, especially when extrinsic rewards overshadow genuine engagement. He advocates for intrinsic motivators like meaningful work, autonomy, and a caring corporate culture. Stiffler, on the other hand, supports incentive programs as tools for boosting productivity and aligning employee goals with organizational objectives, emphasizing that properly structured incentives can motivate performance. I find Kohn's perspective more compelling because numerous studies indicate that extrinsic rewards can diminish intrinsic motivation and impair long-term performance, particularly in creative or complex tasks requiring sustained effort. Over-reliance on incentives may encourage shortcuts or unethical behavior, as employees seek immediate rewards rather than genuine engagement. Conversely, fostering a work environment that emphasizes intrinsic motivators and aligns employee values with organizational purpose tends to produce more sustainable motivation and ethical behavior. Therefore, incentive programs should be designed cautiously, emphasizing intrinsic motivators and ethical practices rather than solely relying on external rewards to drive performance.

Michael Mello emphasizes that employees join unions primarily to secure better wages, benefits, and working conditions. However, alternative considerations also influence unionization decisions. Job security is a significant factor, especially in industries prone to layoffs or economic downturns. Employees may also seek representation to balance power dynamics with management, ensuring fair treatment and voice in workplace policies. Additionally, unions often advocate for workplace safety, equitable treatment regardless of gender or ethnicity, and access to professional development opportunities. Cultural factors, such as a collective identity or community ties, can also motivate union membership. Despite a decline in unionization rates, organizations must remain attentive to labor relations because unions influence organizational stability, wages, and employee morale. Poor labor relations can lead to work stoppages, reduced productivity, and damage to employer reputation. Positive labor relations, including transparent communication and fair treatment, foster healthier workplaces and can prevent legal disputes or conflict escalation. Hence, understanding the multifaceted reasons for unionization helps organizations develop better labor strategies and maintain constructive employee relations, crucial for long-term success.

Regulation of executive pay and shareholder rights is a contentious issue. The private sector’s autonomy is essential to foster innovation, competitive markets, and executive accountability. However, excessive executive compensation without oversight can lead to misaligned incentives, income inequality, and perceptions of unfairness, particularly when pay disparities exceed those of average employees or are disconnected from firm performance. Government intervention, such as regulations on compensation committees, disclosure requirements, or caps, aims to promote transparency, align executive incentives with shareholder interests, and prevent abuse. For instance, the Dodd-Frank Act introduced measures to enhance disclosure and reduce risky executive pay packages tied to short-term gains. Yet, overly restrictive regulations risk stifling managerial talent and innovation, potentially discouraging qualified executives from leading firms. Therefore, a balanced approach involving regulatory oversight combined with corporate governance reforms may be most effective. This ensures accountability and transparency, while preserving the flexibility necessary for private-sector competitiveness. Ultimately, responsible regulation aligned with stakeholder interests can enhance trust and stability in financial markets, fostering sustainable growth and fair executive compensation system.

References

• Becker, H. (2006). Human Rights and Social Justice. Routledge.
• Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review.
• Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review.
• Greenwood, M. (2013). Ethical Roadmap for Business Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics.
• Leslie, E. (2019). The Role of Unions in Contemporary Labour Markets. Labour Studies Journal.
• Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics.
• Onkila, T. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
• Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense. Harvard Business Review.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Smith, N. C. (2013). Corporations and the Politics of Stakeholder Engagement. Business & Society.