Arts 230 Week 5 Creating Conceptual Art Worksheet

Arts230 Week 5 Creating Conceptual Art Worksheet

Arts230 Week 5 Creating Conceptual Art Worksheet Name: Date Due: INSTRUCTIONS: · Select a work of art that was created between 1870 and 1930 – anywhere in the world – that affects you personally. · Discuss below how you would transform that image to make a strong personal statement using one of the following contemporary visual arts media: photography, video or computer-based media. · NOTE TO HELP: Visual artists sometimes create a work based on a past work of art. As an example to help you with this assignment consider that Eduard Manet created Le Dejeuner sur L’herbe (1883) based on Marcantonio Raimondi’s The Judgment of Paris (c. ). (See figures 19-25 and 19-24, respectfully in Chapter 19 of A World of Art.) Sometimes the artist’s agenda is political, satirical or imitative, and sometimes the artist chooses this way to challenge established aesthetic values. PLEASE NOTE: Read each question and the rubric below carefully. You may use first-person (“I”) where appropriate. Minimum 150 words per response unless otherwise indicated. Cite definitions and research from your assigned text, electronic readings or other peer-reviewed sources (see Instructor Policies for guidance): Questions Response Briefly describe the original art work you selected. What media was used, and when was it created? What artistic/aesthetic period (such as Middle Ages or Impressionism) does it represent? Who was the artist? What message do you think he or she intended to communicate? Which new technology did you select for your version and why? Briefly describe the art work you would create. How is it different and how is it similar to the original? Briefly describe the media, process and materials you would use to create your new art work. Where should your art work be displayed? Who is your intended audience? How do you think the message from your art work relates to the message that was intended by the original art work? (Minimum 100 words) References RUBRIC CONTENT FACTORS (70%) 0-0.4 Points 0.5-0.7 Points 0.8-1.0 Points 1.1-1.4 Points 10 Total Points Possible Coverage Discussion of most key elements is missing or unclear Some key elements are covered, with two or more missing Most key elements of the assignment are covered well; one or two elements missing or unclear Exceptional coverage of all key elements of the assignment Content Content does not focus primarily on the assignment elements, is neither supported accurately nor delivered persuasively Content is missing regarding several key elements of assignment; some inaccuracies; arguments or assertions are not always persuasive Opportunities missed to provide comprehensive content; content is accurate and persuasive overall Content is comprehensive, accurate and persuasive Understanding of Theory(ies) Most examples and language from the theory(ies) are out of context and/or irrelevant to the major point(s); terms are inaccurate and/or irrelevant and not defined Some examples or uses of language from theory(ies) are out of context and/or irrelevant to the major point(s); terms are not always used correctly and/or defined for the reader Several examples and some appropriate language from relevant theory(ies); terms used often are described accurately The writer uses appropriate examples and language from relevant theory(ies) for each major point; terms specific to each theory are described accurately Analysis There is little or no analysis of major points; discussion often is irrelevant Analysis is missing on more than one major point; relevance of the analysis is not always clear for the reader Most major points include a clear analysis demonstrating a good understanding of key points and their relevance to the overall subject of the assignment Analysis of major points from the assignment demonstrates a strong understanding of key points and their relevance to the overall subject of the assignment Research Little or no research is provided to support content Research is mainly from sources that are not peer reviewed or the assigned text(s); links between the discussion and research are often missing or unclear Some research is included from assigned text(s) and peer-reviewed sources; a strong link between the discussion and the research is missing Research is from assigned text(s) and peer-reviewed sources; information from cited sources clearly relates to the topic being discussed MECHANICS FACTORS (30%) 0-0.41 Points 0.41-0.48 Points 0.49-0.54 Points 0.55-0.6 Points Formatting There is little or no formatting compliant with APA formatting guidelines (see APA sample paper in CWE) There are several key formatting errors in the worksheet There are one or two formatting errors in the worksheet The worksheet - including citations and reference section - is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements Intellectual Property Citations and references are missing for all or most intellectual property (see Instructor Plagiarism Policy for this course and Student Code of Academic Integrity in CWE) Some opportunities missed to cite intellectual property; in-text citations were missing but on reference page or reference page was included but not cited in the text One or two opportunities missed to cite intellectual property; in-text citations were not always matched with references on reference page Intellectual property is recognized at all times with both in-text citations and a reference page Grammar, Etc. Repeated errors in spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation made understanding the major points in the paper difficult to understand (see Grammar and Writing Guides in the CWE) Several errors regarding spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation Some errors regarding spelling, grammar, word usage, and/or punctuation Rules of spelling, grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed Sentence Variety and Clarity Sentences are often run-on or incomplete; several sentences or phrases are difficult to understand as written (see Sentence Variety tutorial in Writing Styles/CWE) Sentence structure tends to be limited to one style; sentences or phrases are often unclear for the reader Good sentence variety overall; some sentences or phrases are unclear for the reader Sentences are complete, clear, concise, and varied Word Count Word count requirement is not met Word count is 25% or more over or under assignment requirements Word count is 15% over or under assignment requirements Word count meets assignment requirements TOTAL See Instructor Policies for Instructor’s Plagiarism Policy