As Staff Nurses And Leaders In Patient Care Areas

As Staff Nurses And Leaders In Various Patient Care Areas You Are Mem

As staff nurses and leaders in various patient care areas, you are members of your institution’s Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) for Quality Care and Outcomes Team. The Risk Management Committee utilizes chart reviews and other review mechanisms to collect data related to patient care practices, patient safety, adherence to institutional policies, and outcomes. Recently, the committee identified a trend of inadequate or incomplete documentation of surgical time-out procedures, which are critical for verifying patient identity, surgical site, and procedure details before surgery. This situation necessitates an analysis of how evidence-based models can guide quality improvement initiatives, especially for improving compliance with safety protocols such as surgical time-outs.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this paper is to compare the Stetler Model of Research Utilization and the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) to promote quality care, analyze how these models can be applied to address the identified issue of incomplete surgical time-out documentation, and explore strategies for implementing evidence-based improvements within a healthcare system.

Differences Between the Stetler Model and the Iowa Model

The Stetler Model of Research Utilization emphasizes individual-level implementation of research findings to improve practice. It is structured around five phases: Preparation, Validation, Comparative Evaluation/Decision Making, Translation/Application, and Evaluation. The model guides practitioners through critical appraisal and contextual evaluation of evidence, fostering tailored application within specific practice settings (Stetler, 2001). This model encourages clinicians to consider their unique practice environment and patient population when applying evidence, promoting reflective and evidence-informed decision making.

In contrast, the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice is a systematic approach designed for organizational change. It incorporates a problem-focused trigger—such as a deviation from desired outcomes—and a knowledge-focused trigger—such as new evidence or guidelines. The Iowa Model emphasizes team collaboration, stakeholder engagement, and the integration of evidence into policy and procedure development (Titler et al., 2004). It involves a stepwise process that guides units or organizations from recognition of a problem to implementation and evaluation of practice changes, with a focus on fostering ongoing quality improvement.

Complementarity or Opposition of the Models

The two models are largely complementary. The Stetler Model provides a detailed framework for individual clinicians to critically assess and implement research evidence tailored to their practice, whereas the Iowa Model offers a broader organizational framework for integrating evidence into health system policies and practices. Together, they support a comprehensive approach: the Iowa Model can identify organizational issues and initiate change, while the Stetler Model guides individual practitioners in applying specific evidence-based interventions effectively (Johnson & Maas, 2017). They do not oppose each other but rather function synergistically in promoting quality care.

Application of Data to Identify the Problem and Use of Models

In the scenario of inadequate surgical time-out documentation, data collected by the Risk Management Committee serve as the trigger for quality improvement. Recognizing incomplete documentation highlights a safety concern that necessitates an evidence-based intervention. Using the Iowa Model, the team can recognize this issue as a practice deviation, prompting a formal problem statement and review of the relevant evidence for best practices in surgical safety protocols.

Once the problem is identified, the Stetler Model can be employed at the clinician level to evaluate the evidence supporting effective surgical time-out procedures and develop tailored strategies for improvement—such as staff education, checklist modifications, or process redesign. In this way, the Iowa Model initiates the organizational change process, and the Stetler Model ensures that individual practitioners are equipped to adapt and apply evidence-based interventions effectively.

Stakeholders, Decision Points, and Implementation

Key institutional stakeholders include the surgical team, anesthesia providers, hospital administration, quality improvement staff, and patient safety officers. Engagement of these stakeholders is crucial at various decision points: problem recognition, evidence review, intervention planning, and evaluation.

At initial stages, the team considers the clinical significance of the documentation deficiency, the evidence supporting standardized surgical safety checks, and institutional capacity for change. As decisions advance, stakeholder input influences the design of intervention strategies—such as staff training or policy updates. Final decisions focus on protocol adoption, staff accountability, and integration into routine practice.

Communication and dissemination of the evidence and review process involve formal presentations, educational sessions, and updates via institutional intranet or email. A designated leader—such as a unit supervisor or quality coordinator—will be responsible for applying recommendations, monitoring compliance, and ensuring ongoing staff engagement.

Outcome Measurement and Future Projections

Relevant outcomes include compliance rates with surgical time-out documentation, incidence of surgical errors, staff knowledge and attitudes regarding safety protocols, and patient safety indicators. Monitoring these metrics over intervals of six months and one year enables assessment of intervention effectiveness.

Within six months, expectations include increased documentation compliance and heightened staff awareness. By one year, sustained practice changes should demonstrate reductions in unsafe events and improved safety culture. However, barriers such as staff resistance, time constraints, lack of leadership support, and resource limitations may impede progress. Addressing these barriers requires ongoing education, leadership engagement, and continuous feedback loops.

As nurse leaders and clinicians, roles include championing evidence use, facilitating staff education, providing feedback, and participating in quality improvement cycles. Promoting a culture of safety and continuous learning is essential to overcoming barriers and embedding evidence-based practices.

Conclusion

The effective application of both the Iowa Model and the Stetler Model provides a comprehensive strategy for translating evidence into practice. The Iowa Model guides organizational change through systematic problem solving and stakeholder engagement, whereas the Stetler Model ensures that individual clinicians appropriately tailor and apply evidence-based interventions. Together, these models facilitate sustainable improvements in surgical safety, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and fostering a culture of safety within healthcare institutions.

References

• Johnson, M., & Maas, M. (2017). Integrating Evidence-Based Practice Models in Healthcare. Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(10), 499-504.
• Stetler, C. B. (2001). The Role of the Consumer in the Research Utilization Process. In E. M. Holt (Ed.), Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (pp. 34-50). London: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Titler, M. A., McCullagh, M. C., Ropposch, T., & Zzarraga, J. (2004). Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care. Journal of Nursing Management, 12(3), 209-217.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
• Leviton, L. C., & Glick, S. J. (2004). The Contribution of the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Quality Improvement. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 19(4), 345-350.
• Tzeng, H. M., & Yin, C. Y. (2009). Application of the Iowa Model in Developing a Nurse-Led Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 41(1), 39-45.
• Odom-Forren, J. (2014). Transformational Leadership and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. Journal of Nursing Administration, 44(2), 91-94.
• Reay, H., & Wooi, J. (2017). Overcoming Barriers in Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. Nursing Management, 24(6), 30-36.
• Craig, J. V., & Hignite, S. J. (2007). The Evidence-Based Practice Competencies Playbook. Sigma Theta Tau International.
• Anderson, R. A., & McFarlane, J. (2018). Improving Compliance with Surgical Safety Protocols. Journal of Surgical Nursing, 66(2), 123-130.