Assignment 1 Discussion: Random Selection, Saturday August 1

Assignment 1discussion Random Selectionbysaturday August 1 2015 P

What does it mean to say the files were randomly selected? How would the researcher randomly select files? In other words, what does the process look like? What is the probability that if we pulled another student file from the counseling center the student would fall in each of the following categories: a) mental health issues, b) learning/school issues OR relationship issues, c) any category except other? Would our probabilities and results be different if we used convenience sampling? Why or why not?

Paper For Above instruction

Random selection is a fundamental concept in statistical sampling, referring to a process where each member of a population has an equal chance of being chosen. In the context of the student counseling center, random selection means that each student’s file was chosen without bias, ensuring that every individual seeking help had an equal opportunity to be included in the sample. This approach enhances the representativeness of the data, allowing for more accurate generalizations about the entire population of students seeking counseling services. To achieve this, a researcher might assign a unique identifier to every file and use a random number generator or a lottery system to select files. This process eliminates selection bias by not favoring any particular student or type of issue, and ensures that the sample accurately reflects the varied reasons students seek counseling.

The probabilities of selecting a file from each category can be derived from the provided data: mental health issues (25), learning/school issues (15), relationship issues (5), and other (5). The total number of files sampled is 50. The probability that a randomly selected student has mental health issues is therefore 25/50 or 0.50, indicating a 50% chance. If the student has either learning/school issues or relationship issues, the combined probability is the sum of their individual probabilities: (15 + 5) / 50 = 20 / 50 = 0.40, meaning there’s a 40% chance. The probability that the student falls into any category except "other" is the sum of all categories except "other": mental health, learning/school, and relationship issues, which combined makes 25 + 15 + 5 = 45 files. Thus, the probability is 45/50 = 0.90, or 90%. Conversely, the probability that a student falls in the "other" category is 5/50 = 0.10 or 10%.

If the sampling method were changed to convenience sampling, the probabilities and results might differ significantly. Convenience sampling involves selecting readily available files without randomization, which often introduces bias. For example, if counselors typically record certain types of issues more frequently or tend to process specific cases first, the sample might overrepresent certain categories like mental health issues. This bias can distort the true distribution of reasons for seeking counseling, leading to inaccurate probability estimates. Unlike random sampling, which aims to capture a representative snapshot of the entire population, convenience sampling can produce skewed data that does not reliably reflect the actual proportions of issues among all students. Therefore, using convenience sampling generally reduces the statistical validity and generalizability of the findings, potentially leading to misleading conclusions about the prevalence of various issues among students at the counseling center.

References

• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
• Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Lohr, S. L. (1999). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Duxbury Press.
• Levy, P. S., & Lemeshow, S. (2013). Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. Wiley.
• Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 159-164.
• Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining sample size. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
• Hawkes, N. (2010). Sampling methods in health research. British Medical Journal, 340, c2159.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.