Assignment 2 Capstone Project: Drawing Conclusions And Makin

Assignment 2capstone Project Drawing Conclusions And Making Recommend

Assignment 2 Capstone Project: Drawing Conclusions and Making Recommendations 4+ Pages APA FORMAT In-text Citations not including Reference Page. Due WEDNESDAY 9pm New York time. Be sure to include in-text citations from scholarly resources. In research-based projects, conclusions and recommendations are an important part in finalizing efforts and sharing insights gained from the project. For your Capstone Project, your conclusions and recommendations will be based on your literature review and any other information you may have gathered.

For this Assignment, you reflect on the literature you found for your Capstone Project. Then, you consider conclusions and recommendations you may develop related to your research questions. To complete: Write a 4-page paper that addresses the following: Briefly describe the problem or issue you selected and the research question you developed for your Capstone Project: What are some of the success factors in programs such as Missouri Reentry Process that reduce recidivism? Explain one conclusion you might make, based on the analysis of the literature you found and your proposed research. With this conclusion in mind, explain one recommendation you might make regarding the problem or issue you identified.

Paper For Above instruction

The issue selected for this capstone project revolves around criminal recidivism, with a particular focus on the Missouri Reentry Process. Recidivism—where individuals re-offend and are re-incarcerated—poses significant challenges to the criminal justice system, social reintegration, and public safety. The research question guiding this project is: “What are some of the success factors in programs such as Missouri Reentry Process that reduce recidivism?” Addressing this question involves exploring the key elements within reentry programs that contribute to lowering re-offense rates, including community support, employment assistance, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and ongoing supervision.

Based on the literature review and analysis of existing research, one conclusion emerges: comprehensive and individualized reentry programs that incorporate multi-faceted support services are vital for success. Studies such as Heller and Zavaleta (2008) suggest that addressing the diverse needs of formerly incarcerated individuals—such as mental health, substance abuse, employment, and social support—is essential in reducing recidivism. These findings point to the importance of integrated services that recognize the complex, interconnected challenges faced by individuals transitioning back into the community. The Missouri Reentry Process exemplifies this approach by providing targeted interventions designed to meet individual needs, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful reintegration and reducing re-offense.

With this conclusion, a key recommendation is that policymakers and program administrators prioritize the development and funding of comprehensive reentry services that are tailored to individual risk profiles and needs. Specifically, expanding access to mental health and substance abuse treatment, along with employment and housing support, can enhance the effectiveness of reentry programs. Such an integrated approach aligns with research by Booth, Colomb, and Williams (2008), who emphasize that well-coordinated efforts and personalized intervention plans are critical in fostering successful reentry outcomes. Furthermore, ongoing evaluation and adaptation of programs—based on empirical data—are necessary to ensure continuous improvement and responsiveness to emerging challenges.

References

  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Heller, N. E., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2008). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation, 142, 14–32.
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2000). NASA’s actions to implement the Rogers Commission recommendations after the Challenger accident. Retrieved from
  • U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2004). Summary of recommendations–The 9/11 Commission report. Retrieved from

Related Assignments