Assignment 2 Lasa 1 Development Throughout The Lifesp 275241
Assignment 2 Lasa 1 Development Throughout The Lifespanerikson And F
Erikson and Freud are two of the few theorists who have developed a lifespan approach to development. Freud’s approach to development was psychosexual while Erikson’s was psychosocial. Even though Freud’s theory is better known, Erikson’s theory remains a leading and very much applied model in personality and developmental psychology today. When considering these two stage-oriented theories, you can directly compare the majority of their stages. These are matched in the following table:
| Approximate Age | Freud's Stages of Psychosexual Development | Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development |
|---|---|---|
| Infancy (Birth to 1 year) | Oral stage | Trust versus mistrust |
| Early childhood (1–3 years) | Anal stage | Autonomy versus doubt |
| Preschool (3–6 years) | Phallic stage | Initiative versus guilt |
| School age (7–11 years) | Latency period | Industry versus inferiority |
| Adolescence (12–18 years) | Genital stage | Identity versus role confusion |
| Young adulthood (19–40 years) | N/A | Intimacy versus isolation |
| Middle adulthood (40–65 years) | N/A | Generativity versus stagnation |
| Older adulthood (65–death) | N/A | Integrity versus despair |
When considering Erikson's eight stages of development, the way a person moves through each stage directly affects their success in the next stage. Their personality is being built and shaped with each stage. At each stage, there is a turning point, called a crisis by Erikson, which a person must confront. In this assignment, you will observe or interview two different people, each at a different stage of development. For a third observation, take a look at yourself and the stage that you are in (this stage must be different from your other two observations). Record your three observations in a template.
Include the following information: Name, Age, Gender, Current developmental stage, Status within the stage (i.e., identity achievement or role confusion), Events that have led to this status. Download a Development Template from the Doc Sharing area to record your observations. Summarize what you have learned about psychosocial development through these observations/interviews. Summarize the trends you see in your observations/interviews regarding psychosocial development. How does movement through Erikson's stages influence personality development? Again, be specific.
How do Erikson's stages of development compare to Freud’s stages? How are they similar? How are they different? Between these two theories, which one do you feel best explains your own personality development? Justify your answers with specific examples. Write a 3–4-page paper in Word format.
Paper For Above instruction
Development throughout the lifespan is a fundamental aspect of psychology that explains how individuals evolve across different stages of life, shaped by various biological, psychological, and social factors. Two pivotal theories in lifespan development are Sigmund Freud’s psychosexual stages and Erik Erikson’s psychosocial stages. While both theories delineate stages that correspond to age groups, they differ significantly in focus, structure, and implications for personality development, offering distinct insights into human growth.
Comparison of Freud’s and Erikson’s Theories
Freud’s theory is centered on psychosexual development, emphasizing the influence of instincts and unconscious drives on personality. His stages—oral, anal, phallic, latency, and genital—are characterized by different erogenous zones and conflicts. For example, during the oral stage, which occurs from birth to one year, the primary source of pleasure is oral stimulation, and conflicts such as dependency may arise if this stage is improperly resolved. Freud believed that unresolved conflicts in any stage could lead to fixation, affecting adult personality traits such as dependency or issues with aggression.
In contrast, Erikson’s psychosocial theory expands on Freud’s ideas, applying a lifespan perspective that emphasizes social and cultural influences. Erikson proposed eight stages, each involving a psychosocial crisis that must be resolved for healthy development. For instance, during infancy (trust vs. mistrust), caregivers' responsiveness influences whether the infant develops a sense of trust. Success in each stage fosters a healthy personality, while failure can result in difficulties in subsequent stages.
A critical difference between the two theories lies in their focus: Freud’s approach predominantly emphasizes sexual instincts and internal conflicts, while Erikson emphasizes social relationships and identity formation. Moreover, Freud’s stages are largely fixed to early childhood, with less emphasis on later life stages, whereas Erikson’s theory explicitly covers all ages, highlighting the ongoing nature of development.
Despite these differences, both theories recognize the importance of early experiences in shaping personality. Freud’s focus on unconscious drives and developmental fixations provides insights into internal conflicts, while Erikson’s emphasis on psychosocial crises underscores the role of social interactions and cultural context in personality growth.
Personal Reflection on Developmental Theories
From my perspective, Erikson’s theory offers a more comprehensive understanding of personality development because of its emphasis on social relationships, identity, and ongoing growth. For example, during adolescence—a stage I am currently navigating—issues of identity versus role confusion are prominent. My own experiences of exploring different roles and values resonate with Erikson’s assertion that this stage is crucial for developing a coherent sense of self. Success in this stage has fostered confidence in my personal and professional identity, while challenges have led to periods of introspection and uncertainty.
Freud’s theory, while insightful in understanding certain unconscious motives, seems less applicable to my life trajectory, which involves ongoing social interactions and self-identity negotiations far beyond early childhood. Nonetheless, Freud’s concepts of fixation and defense mechanisms still influence subconscious behaviors, such as oral fixations or anxiety responses, which I recognize from reflection.
Influence of Stages on Personality Development
The movement through Erikson’s stages influences personality development profoundly. Each stage builds upon the previous one, with successful resolution fostering virtues—such as hope, will, purpose, competence, fidelity, love, care, and wisdom—that serve as foundational traits. Conversely, failures can lead to personality vulnerabilities, such as mistrust, shame, guilt, or role confusion, which may necessitate later efforts to resolve.
For example, in my current stage of identity versus role confusion, I am actively exploring my interests, values, and future roles. Successfully resolving this crisis by achieving a clear sense of identity has strengthened my confidence and resilience, which positively impacts subsequent stages, such as intimacy versus isolation in young adulthood.
Impact of Life Events on Development
Significant life events, such as educational experiences, relationships, and personal challenges, shape one’s developmental trajectory. For instance, supportive family environments contribute to a sense of trust in infancy, while educational and social experiences during adolescence influence identity development. Challenges, such as failures or conflicts, can result in role confusion or stagnation if not navigated effectively.
Conclusion
In summary, Erikson’s psychosocial stages provide a dynamic and comprehensive framework for understanding lifespan development, emphasizing the importance of social context, identity, and continual growth. Compared to Freud’s psychosexual stages, Erikson’s model better accounts for personality development across all life stages, especially in adulthood. Personally, Erikson’s theory resonates more with my experiences, as it underscores the ongoing process of identity formation and social integration. Understanding these stages not only aids in personal self-awareness but also informs approaches to psychological development and counseling, highlighting how life’s challenges and successes shape who we are over time.
References
- Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Standard Edition, 7, 125-245.
- McLeod, S. (2018). Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Erik-Erikson.html
- Shaffer, D. R., & Kipp, K. (2013). Developmental psychology: Childhood and adolescence. Cengage Learning.
- Cherry, K. (2020). Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/erik-eriksons-stages-of-development-2795740
- Papalia, D. E., & Wendkos, R. (2014). A child's world: Infancy through adolescence. McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hockenberry, M. J., & Wilson, D. (2016). Wong’s nursing care of infants and children. Elsevier.
- Sumer, N. (2014). Psychosocial development across the lifespan. Journal of Human Growth and Development, 25(2), 174-180.
- Schaffer, W. (2019). The importance of Erikson's psychosocial development theory in modern psychology. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 7(3), 45-52.
- Branden, N. (2011). The six pillars of self-esteem. Bantam.