Assignment Brief And Feedback Form For Single Assignment

Assignment Brief And Feedback Formunit With Single Assignmentname Of

This document provides the instructions for preparing a formal report for Coventry University College (CUC). Your task is to select one of the following research topics: either to assess the levels of awareness of CUC among the population in and around Coventry, or to explore the opinions of students and staff regarding the current tuition fees. Your report should be approximately 650 words and structured into specific sections, including Terms of Reference, Methods, Findings, and Conclusion. You should detail how you will collect and analyze data—using questionnaires, commentary on marketing, or course information—and decide on an appropriate sample size. In discussing your findings, quantify and represent data through charts, graphs, or tables, and evaluate what your research illustrates about awareness or opinions, including the limitations of your methods. Your report must include at least one appropriately cited chart, graph, or table to support your conclusions and recommendations. Additional sections include Recommendations, References, and Appendices. The task requires a practical report of about 750 words, with a strict word limit tolerance, assigned for assessment towards your final grade. You must submit your work via Moodle Turnitin by 11:55 pm on 18th November 2016. The assignment includes a learner declaration confirming originality and proper use of sources.

Paper For Above instruction

The research report on public awareness of Coventry University College (CUC) or opinions regarding tuition fees requires a comprehensive analysis structured into clear, academic sections. The introductory terms of reference establish the scope, focusing either on awareness levels or opinions. An effective methodology, vital for the validity of findings, includes carefully designed questionnaires, analysis of marketing strategies, and course publicity. Sample size determination should balance resource constraints and statistical validity, commonly involving representative sampling to ensure credible results.

The findings section plays a critical role in portraying data representation through charts, graphs, and tables, which visually substantiate the analysis. Quantifying responses—such as percentages of aware vs. unaware individuals or course opinions—enhances clarity. Interpreting these data involves discussing what they imply about CUC’s recognition or fee perceptions, considering the strengths and weaknesses of the data collection methods. For example, questionnaires might be limited by response bias, or marketing commentary may lack objectivity. A key aspect is including a well-crafted chart or table, correctly cited, to exemplify the data supporting conclusions.

The conclusion synthesizes the main insights from the data, confirming whether awareness levels meet expectations or if fee opinions reflect significant sentiment. Recommendations follow logically, suggesting strategies for improving awareness, marketing efforts, or fee structures if needed. These should be actionable, grounded in the research findings, and aimed at enhancing CUC’s engagement with potential students and staff.

Proper referencing of sources used in building the report adheres to academic standards, ensuring credibility and transparency. Appendices may incorporate supplementary data or documents referenced in the report, such as raw questionnaires or detailed charts.

This assignment offers a practical opportunity to develop research, data analysis, and reporting skills within an academic context, demonstrating the ability to produce a well-structured, evidence-based report aligned with specified criteria.

References

• Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Fink, A. (2013). How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage Publications.
• Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing Research in the Real World. Sage Publications.
• Blaxter, L., Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2010). How to Research. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Weiss, R. S. (2011). Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. Routledge.
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2017). Principles of Marketing. Pearson.
• Neuman, W. L. (2013). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
• Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.