Assignment Content Throughout The Course You've Explored
Assignment Contentthroughout The Course Youve Explored The Different
Throughout the course, you’ve explored the different components of the criminal justice system and how they function on their own. It is also important to understand how they function together. The juvenile justice system has different rules and processes than the adult justice system. In this assignment, you will explore how a juvenile progresses through the different components of the criminal justice system so you can gain understanding of the relationship between these components and see how the juvenile justice system works. Read the scenario below and complete the assignment that follows.
Scenario: 17-year-old Peter broke into a home, stole approximately $10,000 worth of jewelry and electronics, and consumed a bottle of wine before he fled the scene in a stolen car. The police stopped Peter after noticing him swerving, speeding, and then slowing down on the interstate highway. During the stop, police saw the “loot” stashed in the back seat of Peter’s car and suspected he was involved in more than driving while intoxicated. Peter was properly arrested and booked on the charge of driving while intoxicated. The police believe Peter’s fingerprints will match those discovered at the burglary scene and are likely to charge him with burglary and larceny, as well as grand theft auto.
Peter’s parents have been contacted and are debating whether he should retain counsel because they are struggling financially. To complicate matters, Peter fully admitted to the charges before his parents were contacted. Since it is Peter’s first time in the juvenile justice system, neither he nor his parents know what to expect. What is likely to happen? Will Peter have to go to court or trial? If so, what can he expect in the court process? Scenario adapted with permission from: McGraw-Hill Instructor Resources for Bohm, R., & Haley, N. K. (2021). Introduction to criminal justice (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Instructions: Research the juvenile justice laws or policies in your community or state and write a 1,050- to 1,400-word response to Peter’s parents. Explain the process Peter might go through in the application of criminal justice in your community or state. Note: You may wish to use Figure 13.1, “The Formal Juvenile Justice Process,” on p. 542 of your textbook to guide your research. Address the following in your paper: Identify the city or state laws you are researching.
Describe 1 or more procedures police may use in processing Peter’s case and explain why you selected these procedures. Consider the following questions in your response: What steps might the police take in their investigation? Will Peter be charged with a crime(s)? If so, what crime(s) could Peter be charged with? What options do all parties (Peter, his parents, and the police) have related to intake, processing, and custody or release?
Identify 1 or more potential court proceedings Peter may face and explain why you selected these proceedings. Consider the following questions in your response: What legal and financial rights can Peter and his family pursue? Is Peter likely to go through informal or formal court proceedings? Explain your reasoning. Describe court procedures if Peter’s case goes to trial. Include any details related to these procedures. If Peter goes through a disposition hearing, what will that entail? Describe the type of justice the judge may administer. Predict 1 potential post-court outcome. Explain the rationale for your prediction with relevant details.
Address the following question in your response: What will life be like for Peter after he has exited the court system? Cite 1 or 2 sources to support your assignment. Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.
Paper For Above instruction
The juvenile justice system varies significantly across different states and municipalities, but the overarching principles and processes tend to follow a structured pattern aimed at rehabilitation rather than punishment. This essay will examine how the juvenile justice process might unfold for Peter, a minor accused of serious offenses, within the context of California law. California's juvenile justice system emphasizes diversion, detention, and juvenile court proceedings designed to address juvenile offending behaviors while providing opportunities for positive development and reintegration into the community.
In processing Peter's case, police procedures are pivotal. Initially, law enforcement would conduct an investigation, collect evidence, and determine whether there are sufficient grounds to charge him formally. Given Peter's admission and the evidence, police might initiate a detention hearing under California Welfare and Institutions Code § 602, which allows for holding minors pending adjudication if deemed necessary for the community or the minor's safety. The police would also perform fingerprint analysis to confirm his involvement, and interviews may be conducted to understand the circumstances surrounding his actions. The selection of these procedures hinges on the need to gather sufficient evidence and ensure community safety while respecting the minor’s rights.
Following police processing, Peter could face formal or informal proceedings. In California, juvenile cases may bypass formal court trials via probation or diversion programs, especially for first-time offenders like Peter. However, given the severity of the charges—including burglary, larceny, and grand theft auto—formal procedures are likely. Charges could be filed under Welfare and Institutions Code § 602, leading to a petition against Peter. He would then have a detention or advisement hearing, where the judge would review evidence and determine whether he should be detained or released pending further proceedings.
If the case proceeds to a juvenile court trial, the court process involves a hearing where the prosecution (the district attorney) presents evidence, and the defense can contest it through motions or cross-examinations. In California, the juvenile court system emphasizes rehabilitation, and as such, judges assess the juvenile's needs and risks before imposing a disposition. A disposition hearing follows, where the court determines appropriate interventions, which might include probation, counseling, community service, or placement in a juvenile facility. The judge will also consider the minor’s age, history, and circumstances, aligning with the goal of reducing recidivism and promoting positive development.
As for the legal rights of Peter and his family, they have the right to be represented by counsel, to receive timely notice of proceedings, and to confront witnesses. The family can pursue appeals if they believe procedural errors occurred. Financially, he qualifies for court-appointed counsel under California law if they cannot afford private attorneys (California Welfare and Institutions Code § 660). During these proceedings, all parties’ options for custody include detention, supervised release, or probation, depending on the case specifics and risk assessments.
Post-court life for Peter depends greatly on the court’s disposition. If he receives supervision or probation, he may be required to participate in counseling, community service, or educational programs. The juvenile justice system aims to facilitate his rehabilitation and reduce the likelihood of reoffending. Successful completion of court mandates can lead to case closure, allowing Peter to reintegrate into society with fewer stigmas than adult criminal convictions. However, a juvenile record may still impact future opportunities, such as employment or education (Mears & Cochran, 2015). The emphasis on reentry and support services is vital for positive outcomes.
In conclusion, Peter’s journey through the juvenile justice system in California involves multiple stages—initial police procedures, detention considerations, court proceedings, and disposition actions—all designed to balance accountability with rehabilitation. Understanding these processes helps in recognizing how juvenile justice aims to support minors while ensuring community safety. The outcome of his case hinges on various factors, including legal procedures, the court’s assessment, and available rehabilitative resources, shaping his life after exiting the system.
References
- California Welfare and Institutions Code § 660 (2021).
- Mears, D. P., & Cochran, J. C. (2015). Juvenile Justice: An Introduction. SAGE Publications.
- Berg, M. T. (2015). Juvenile justice process and youth rights. Journal of Juvenile Law, 37(2), 101–119.
- Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2016). The developmental course of juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 87(6), 1777–1790.
- Smith, J. K. (2018). Understanding juvenile courts in the United States. Criminal Justice Review, 43(4), 422–438.
- National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. (2020). Juvenile court process and procedures. Retrieved from https://www.ncjfcj.org
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2019). Juvenile justice reform: Policies and practices. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov
- Hockenberry, S., & Puzzanchera, C. (2017). Juvenile justice statistics. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. U.S. Department of Justice.
- American Bar Association. (2021). Protecting the rights of juvenile defendants. ABA Journal.
- U.S. Department of Justice. (2022). Juvenile justice and delinquency prevention act. Washington, DC: Author.