Assignment Cover Sheet For Global Health Course Name ✓ Solved

Assignment Cover Sheetcourse Nameglobal Healthcourse Numberphc311crn

Assignment Cover Sheetcourse Name: Global Healthcourse Number: PHC311 CRN 10421 Assignment title or task: In a Word document, write a short essay one page ( words) to answer the following questions: 1. What are some of the key arguments for increased aid funding to low-income countries? 2. What are some debates on what this aid should look like? References should be mention in APA style Cover sheet should be attached with assignment Students ID Student name: Submission date: Instructor name: Dr. Mohammed Shameel. O Grade: …. Out of 5

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Global health initiatives often highlight the critical necessity for increased aid funding to low-income countries as a strategy to alleviate poverty, improve health outcomes, and foster sustainable development. The core arguments for augmenting aid are rooted in moral responsibility, global stability, and economic benefit. Moral responsibility stems from the ethical imperative for wealthier nations to support those with fewer resources, especially considering the persistent disparities in health, education, and living standards (Radelet, 2010). Furthermore, aid can promote global stability; by addressing health crises and poverty, wealthy nations reduce the risk of transnational issues such as infectious disease outbreaks, migration crises, and terrorism (World Bank, 2018). Economically, investing in low-income countries can lead to expanded markets, increased demand for goods, and global economic growth, producing mutual benefits (Moyo, 2009). These arguments form a compelling case for increased aid funding as a tool for fostering a more equitable and interconnected world.

While the rationale for increased aid is strong, debates about the nature and implementation of aid remain contentious. One debate centers on the effectiveness of aid, with critics arguing that aid can create dependency, distort local economies, and sometimes have unintended negative consequences (Easterly, 2006). Critics advocate for a more targeted, transparent, and accountable approach to ensure aid effectively meets its intended goals. Another argument concerns the form aid should take; some advocate for unconditional grants that support government capacity-building and infrastructure, while others favor conditional aid tied to specific reforms or policies to ensure accountability (Burnside & Dollar, 2000). Additionally, there is discussion about the role of NGOs versus government-to-government aid, with the debate focusing on efficiency, sovereignty, and sustainability. These discussions highlight the complexity of aid as a tool for development, emphasizing that increased funding must also consider appropriate structures and governance to be truly effective (Rich et al., 2015).

References

• Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. (2000). Aid, policies, and growth. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 847–868.
• Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. Penguin.
• Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Radelet, S. (2010). New Growth Evidence. In M. H. Hu et al. (Eds.), The Future of Development: Volume 1: Theories and Strategies. Center for Global Development.
• World Bank. (2018). World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. World Bank Publications.
• Rich, B., Rowe, A., & Pader, T. (2015). Managing Aid Effectiveness in Fragile Contexts. United Nations Development Programme.