Business 303 Name Faith Integration Forum Thread Grading Rub

Busi 303namefaith Integration Forum Thread Grading Rubriccriterionp

All key components of the question or statements are answered in a new thread. Clear, logical flow to post. Major points are stated clearly. Major points are supported by a Biblical Reference, good examples (pertinent conceptual or personal examples are acceptable), and thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts). Spelling and grammar are evaluated. The post must have a minimum of 200–250 words.

The educational purpose of the course is for students to engage with each other in an academic and spiritual manner, integrating faith within their discussions.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment for this course is to create a discussion thread that thoroughly addresses the specified question or statement, demonstrating both academic rigor and spiritual insight. This requires the student to articulate their major points clearly, utilizing a logical and coherent flow throughout the post. The integration of faith into the discussion is essential, with proper biblical references supporting the key points. For example, when discussing ethical decision-making in business, referencing scripture such as Proverbs 11:3 ("The integrity of the upright guides them, but the unfaithful are destroyed by their duplicity") can exemplify the importance of integrity through faith-based principles.

In addition to biblical support, students are encouraged to share personal or conceptual examples that are pertinent to the topic. These examples serve to illustrate and deepen understanding of the concepts discussed while demonstrating how faith influences their perspective. For instance, a student might describe a personal experience where their faith guided a business-related decision, highlighting the integration of Christian values into real-world actions. Comparing and contrasting different viewpoints—such as secular ethics versus faith-based ethics—can further showcase thoughtful analysis, considering the assumptions and implications of each perspective.

The quality of writing is also critical; proper spelling and grammar must be maintained to ensure clarity and professionalism. The post must meet the minimum word count of 200–250 words, allowing enough depth for reflection and analysis while remaining concise. The discussion should foster an environment of respectful and meaningful engagement, reflecting the course’s dual aim of academic excellence and spiritual growth. Engaging in this manner encourages students to explore how their faith shapes their approach to business ethics, leadership, and decision-making, ultimately contributing to their holistic development as Christian professionals.

References

  • Colson, C., & Neuhaus, R. J. (2002). Christian Worldview Integration: A Guide for Business and Community Leaders. Baker Academic.
  • George, R. P. (2011). Authentic Faith: Biblical, Historical, Practical, and Theological Perspectives. InterVarsity Press.
  • Nash, R. H. (2015). Christian Ethics in a Technological Age. Eerdmans.
  • Wolters, R. (2005). Christian Ethics: An Introduction to Biblical Moral Reasoning. Eerdmans.
  • Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. HarperOne.
  • Grenz, S. J., & CEP (2004). The Moral Quest: Foundations of Christian Ethics. InterVarsity Press.
  • Vanhoozer, K. J. (2005). The Drama of Doctrine: A Canonical-Linguistic Approach to Christian Theology. Westview Press.
  • Meilander, S. (2005). The Fabric of Ethics. Eerdmans.
  • Moo, R. J. (2008). Contextualization in the New Testament. Zondervan.
  • Brueggemann, W. (2001). The Prophetic Imagination. Fortress Press.

Related Assignments