Business Research Methods 13 Schindler Cases Abstract The Sc

Business Research Methods 13eschindler1casesabstractthe Scenarioi

This case describes a multistage communication study undertaken by the research department of Penton Media, a publisher of business trade magazines, to determine the long-term viability of a reader and advertiser service, the reader service card, a post-card-size device used by readers to request additional information from a particular advertiser. Penton Media, which publishes magazines like Industry Week, Machine Design, and Restaurant Hospitality, observed a decline in the use of reader service cards. The study investigates changes in inquiry methods, including the rising use of email and websites, and aims to assess whether these tools have impacted the effectiveness of traditional reader response mechanisms.

The research involved analyzing advertisement response options in September issues from 12 Penton magazines over a period from 1992 to 1997. The number of response choices per ad increased from an average of 3.3 in 1992 to 4.1 in 1997, with more ads offering toll-free and fax numbers. In 1992, email and website inquiries were nearly nonexistent, but by 1997, online contact options had increased significantly, with 60.9% of ads including website addresses and 17.7% providing email addresses. Postal mailing addresses decreased slightly from 69% in 1992 to 55.5% in 1997.

Penton conducted a comprehensive survey using a stratified disproportionate random sampling method of 4,000 managers, executives, engineers, and purchasing agents across 42 industry/job title strata. The survey yielded 710 responses, with 676 respondents identified as purchase decision-makers. The survey data was analyzed with weighted responses to match the overall population, with a margin of error of ±4% at 95% confidence. Follow-up interviews with 40 respondents provided deeper insights into behaviors and attitudes toward inquiry methods.

The findings revealed that nearly all respondents contacted at least one advertiser in the past year, with half using newer methods like email, fax-on-demand, and website visits. Future projections indicated a substantial increase in the use of email and internet research over the next five years, with 72.4% of respondents planning to use the internet for research purposes, up from 33.1% in the previous year. Access to the internet was common among buyers, and those without current access anticipated gaining it within five years. The study identified key drivers for inquiry method preferences, including speed, cost, and immediacy of need. Buyers generally used phone contact for urgent inquiries, and mailed responses for non-urgent needs.

Paper For Above instruction

The research conducted by Penton Media offers critical insights into the evolving landscape of business inquiry behaviors and the implications for traditional reader response mechanisms, such as the reader service card. The shift from print-based inquiries to digital methods signals a broader transformation in how businesses connect with their audiences and gather market intelligence. This analysis explores the research question hierarchy, examines ethical considerations, evaluates sampling and research design, critiques the survey instrument, discusses data analysis strategies, and considers managerial implications, including potential further research avenues.

Management-Research Question Hierarchy

At the highest level, the overarching management question could be: "Are traditional reader response mechanisms, like the reader service card, still effective in eliciting inquiries compared to newer digital methods?" This broad question stems from the need to evaluate the long-term viability of existing inquiry channels. Nested beneath are specific sub-questions: (1) How have inquiry behaviors changed over time? (2) What factors influence the choice of inquiry method? (3) What are future trends in inquiry preferences? Each sub-question guides the detailed examination of consumer behaviors, technological adoption, and strategic implications for publication advertising and customer engagement.

Ethical Issues Relevant to the Study

Ethical considerations in this research include ensuring respondent confidentiality, voluntary participation, and honest reporting of responses. The survey explicitly assures confidentiality and anonymous aggregation, aligning with ethical standards outlined by the American Marketing Association (AMA, 2013). Additionally, the research must avoid biases in question wording, which could influence responses unfairly. Since the sample involves professional managers and technical decision-makers, the study also bears responsibility to avoid misusing data and to present findings transparently, acknowledging limitations and avoiding overstated conclusions.

Description and Analysis of the Sampling Plan

The study employed stratified disproportionate random sampling, dividing the population into 42 cells based on industry and job title, then oversampling some strata to ensure adequate representation. Strengths of this plan include increased precision in subgroup analysis, better control over sample composition, and improved generalizability within targeted segments. However, weaknesses involve potential sampling bias if strata are inadequately defined or if nonresponse rates vary across strata, affecting representativeness. Oversampling may also introduce complexity in weighting responses during analysis, requiring careful statistical adjustment to prevent distortions.

Research Design and Its Analysis

The research combined descriptive surveys with follow-up qualitative interviews. This mixed-methods approach enhances depth and breadth of understanding. The survey’s cross-sectional design provides snapshots of inquiry behaviors at two points—1992 and 1997—allowing for trend analysis. Its strengths include large sample size and robust statistical analysis, while weaknesses encompass potential response bias, limited causal inference, and reliance on self-reported data, which may be subject to social desirability or recall bias.

Critique of the Survey Instrument

The survey instrument was comprehensive, covering a range of inquiry methods, preferences, and future expectations. Its clarity and logical flow facilitate respondent engagement. However, potential improvements include ensuring question neutrality to prevent bias, providing more detailed scales for frequency of inquiries, and including open-ended questions to capture nuanced behaviors. The instrument's reliance on self-reported data introduces typical limitations regarding accuracy and response bias, especially in assessing future intentions.

Preparing the Survey Data for Analysis

To analyze the survey data with SPSS, responses should be coded systematically: yes/no responses as binary variables (0/1), scaled items (e.g., frequency, importance) as ordinal variables, and categorical variables (e.g., industry, job title) as nominal variables with assigned numeric codes. The code sheet must include variable names, labels, value labels, and missing data codes. Data entry should be double-checked for accuracy, with consistent coding for open-ended responses. Weighted response adjustments should be captured for subgroup analyses, ensuring that the sample accurately reflects the population structure.

Presenting Statistical Findings to Industry Week Decision Makers

When reporting to Industry Week management, the presentation should focus on key indicators: declining use of traditional response cards, rising digital inquiry methods, and future behavioral trends. Graphs illustrating changes over time, such as bar charts or line graphs, can visually emphasize shifts in inquiry channels. Statistical analyses should include significance testing to determine whether observed differences are meaningful. Recommendations should be data-driven, suggesting strategic adjustments like enhanced online engagement or revised inquiry channels, balanced with cost-benefit considerations.

Limitations of the Study

Limitations include potential response bias, nonresponse bias, and the inability to establish causality due to the cross-sectional design. The reliance on self-reported future intentions may overestimate actual future behaviors. Sampling limitations, such as oversampling certain strata, may distort representativeness if not correctly weighted. Additionally, rapid technological change could outpace the snapshot provided, rendering some findings obsolete quickly. Finally, the study’s focus on a specific industry and demographic limits its generalizability to broader or different markets.

Further Research Recommendations

Based on the findings, further research could explore longitudinal studies to monitor actual adoption of new inquiry methods over time. Qualitative studies, including interviews and focus groups, can uncover underlying motivations and barriers to technology adoption. Experiments or pilot programs testing different inquiry channels’ effectiveness and cost-efficiency would provide actionable insights. Additionally, expanding the scope to include other sectors and geographic regions would enhance understanding of industry-wide trends. If declining relevance of paper-based response methods persists, a strategic decision could be to phase out traditional cards gradually, replacing them with integrated digital platforms, but only after validating these changes through rigorous testing.

References

• American Marketing Association. (2013). Ethical standards in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 668-694.
• Long, K. (1999). Communication study findings from Penton Media. Unpublished internal report.
• Schindler, P. S. (2001). Business research methods (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Schindler, D. R., & Cooper, D. R. (2001). Business research methods (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• United States Census Bureau. (2020). Internet access in the United States. Statistical Abstract of the United States.
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
• Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Cook, D. R., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
• Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2015). Qualitative methods in business research. Sage Publications.