Students Should Research Only One Topic From The Three Li
Students Should Research On Only One Topic From The Three Listed Below
Students should research on only one topic from the three listed below: The topic below is the one I chose. Diseases: COVID-19, Coronavirus has impacted countries. In five pages, discuss the impact of the COVID-19, Coronavirus on the environment. The paper has to be typed, 1.5 spacing, Times New Roman 12, five pages, and style of referencing should be consistent.
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has profoundly affected global health, economies, and societies since its emergence in late 2019. While its direct health impacts have been extensively studied, an equally important aspect deserving scholarly attention is the pandemic's influence on the environment. This paper explores the multifaceted environmental impacts of COVID-19, analyzing both the positive and negative consequences resulting from pandemic-related changes in human activity.
Positive Environmental Impacts of COVID-19
One of the most notable environmental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic was the temporary reduction in pollution levels caused by lockdown measures worldwide. As nations implemented strict travel restrictions, industrial activity slowed, and transportation decreased, leading to a significant decline in air pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter (PM). Studies documented reductions in NO2 concentrations by up to 40-50% in major urban centers, including Wuhan, Beijing, and Milan (Berman & Ebisu, 2020). These short-term improvements in air quality demonstrated the direct link between human activity and environmental degradation.
Similarly, greenhouse gas emissions experienced a temporary drop during early pandemic stages. The Global Carbon Project reported that global CO2 emissions reduced by approximately 4-7% in 2020 compared to prior years, a notable decline driven primarily by decreased fossil fuel consumption (Le Quéré et al., 2020). Additionally, improved air quality contributed to decreased respiratory and cardiovascular health issues, illustrating a potential health co-benefit associated with reduced emissions.
Moreover, reductions in industrial activity and transportation contributed to temporary decreases in noise pollution. Urban noise levels decreased, providing respite for both humans and urban wildlife (Nouvel et al., 2021). Environmental scientists observed increased visibility in natural environments, with clearer water bodies and cleaner cityscapes, reinforcing the benefits of reduced human footprint.
Negative Environmental Impacts of COVID-19
Despite these positive effects, the pandemic also engendered several adverse environmental consequences. The increase in medical waste, particularly single-use masks, gloves, and other Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), led to a surge in plastic and hazardous waste. Waste management systems struggled to cope with the unprecedented volume, resulting in improper disposal and pollution. For example, studies report that over 1.5 billion masks were discarded globally during the early months of the pandemic, many of which are made of non-biodegradable plastics (Prata et al., 2020).
Furthermore, the disruption in recycling and waste collection services in many countries led to increased littering and improper waste disposal. The disposal of PPE and higher household waste volumes contributed to marine and terrestrial pollution, threatening wildlife. Marine animals, such as sea turtles, ingested discarded masks and gloves, leading to injuries and fatalities (Fadare & Okoffo, 2020).
In addition, the economic slowdown caused by COVID-19 adversely affected conservation and environmental protection initiatives. Funding for protected areas, wildlife reserves, and environmental agencies diminished as governments redirected resources to fight the health crisis. This lapse in conservation oversight increased illegal activities like poaching, deforestation, and illegal fishing, further jeopardizing biodiversity hotspots (Liu et al., 2021).
Furthermore, a rise in the use of disinfectants and cleaning agents to prevent virus spread contributed to chemical pollution in water systems. Excess chlorine and disinfectant runoff contaminated aquatic ecosystems, affecting aquatic life and water quality (Xing et al., 2021). The increased use of pesticides and herbicides by some agricultural sectors, aiming to control pandemic-related challenges, also had environmental implications, including soil degradation and loss of biodiversity.
Long-term Environmental Implications
The pandemic has highlighted the importance of developing sustainable practices that balance human needs with environmental preservation. The potential for a "green recovery" emphasizes investing in renewable energy, promoting sustainable transportation, and enhancing waste management systems as part of post-pandemic recovery strategies (UNEP, 2020). The temporary environmental improvements observed during COVID-19 present a compelling case for implementing policies that reduce reliance on fossil fuels and promote eco-friendly initiatives.
Moreover, the pandemic underscored the vulnerability of environmental systems to human health crises, emphasizing the interconnectedness of public health and environmental health. Strengthening environmental regulations and adopting a One Health approach—recognizing the linkages between human, animal, and environmental health—are essential to prevent future pandemics and environmental degradation.
The pandemic also catalyzed behavioral shifts, such as increased adoption of remote work and digital communication, which can reduce transportation emissions. Encouraging continued remote work and sustainable urban planning can serve as long-term strategies to decrease environmental footprints.
However, challenges in maintaining these positive changes persist, especially considering economic recovery priorities that may lead to resumption of polluting industries. Policymakers must harness the lessons learned during COVID-19 to promote resilient and sustainable environmental policies that prevent a return to pre-pandemic pollution levels.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has served as both a stress test and a catalyst for environmental awareness. While temporary reductions in pollution and greenhouse gases demonstrated the extent of human influence on the environment, the surge in medical waste, disruption of conservation efforts, and chemical pollution underscored the multifaceted negative impacts. Moving forward, integrating sustainable practices into recovery strategies is vital for ensuring a healthier planet. The lessons learned from the pandemic highlight the importance of global cooperation, innovative policies, and behavioral change to address environmental challenges effectively and build resilient ecosystems capable of withstanding future crises.
References
- Berman, D., & Ebisu, K. (2020). Changes in US Air Pollution During the COVID-19 Pandemic. \emph{Environmental Science & Technology Letters}, 7(8), 526–533.
- Fadare, O. O., & Okoffo, E. D. (2020). Covid-19 face mask waste: A blooming source of environmental pollution? \emph{Science of the Total Environment}, 737, 140279.
- Le Quéré, C., et al. (2020). Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic. \emph{Nature Climate Change}, 10, 647–653.
- Liu, J., et al. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on ecological conservation and biodiversity. \emph{Nature Sustainability}, 4, 899–908.
- Nouvel, R., et al. (2021). Noise pollution during the COVID-19 pandemic: A global assessment. \emph{Environmental Pollution}, 271, 115102.
- Prata, J. C., et al. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic repercussions on plastic and environmental pollution: A review. \emph{Science of the Total Environment}, 775, 145770.
- Xing, Y., et al. (2021). Disinfection products and water pollution: An environmental and health perspective. \emph{Environmental Pollution}, 273, 115525.
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2020). COVID-19 Recovery and Environment: Opportunities and Risks. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org