Capstone Change Project Evaluation Plan Review Your Strategy ✓ Solved

Capstone Change Project Evaluation Planreview Your Strategic Plan To I

Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention. The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan. APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Implementing a successful change in a healthcare setting requires a well-structured evaluation plan to measure the effectiveness of the intervention. This paper outlines a comprehensive evaluation process aligned with the strategic plan, objectives, outcomes, and resources associated with the proposed change. The goal is to assess whether the intervention achieves its desired impact and identify areas for improvement, thereby facilitating effective healthcare delivery.

Strategic Plan and Objectives

The strategic plan centers on improving patient safety through the reduction of medication administration errors. The objectives include implementing a barcode medication administration (BCMA) system, educating staff on its use, and establishing ongoing monitoring for compliance. Resources include technological infrastructure, staff training modules, and a dedicated quality improvement team.

Outcomes and Resources

Expected outcomes entail decreased medication errors, increased staff adherence to protocols, and enhanced patient satisfaction. Resources such as hospital IT support, clinical staff, and data analysts are instrumental in executing and evaluating the intervention.

Evaluation Process Development

To evaluate the effectiveness of the BCMA system, a multi-phase approach will be employed. Initially, baseline data on medication errors will be collected over three months before the intervention. Following implementation, data collection will occur at 1, 3, and 6 months to monitor changes over time.

The evaluation will utilize quantitative methods, analyzing error rates, compliance percentages, and patient satisfaction scores. Qualitative feedback from staff through surveys and focus groups will supplement quantitative data, providing insights into usability and barriers.

Key performance indicators (KPIs) include:

• Reduction in medication errors by at least 30%
• Staff compliance rate with barcode scanning exceeding 90%
• Patient satisfaction scores related to medication safety showing improvement

The data will be analyzed using statistical software to assess significance. A comparison of pre- and post-intervention metrics will determine progress. Root cause analyses will be conducted for any errors that persist after implementation.

Implementation and Continuous Improvement

The evaluation plan emphasizes continuous quality improvement. Weekly meetings with stakeholders will review preliminary data, identify issues, and adapt strategies accordingly. Feedback loops from staff will inform ongoing training and process adjustments. After initial evaluation periods, a formal report will summarize findings, highlighting successes and areas needing refinement.

Conclusion

This evaluation plan provides a structured methodology to assess the impact of the BCMA intervention on medication safety. Its emphasis on quantitative and qualitative data, stakeholder engagement, and ongoing monitoring ensures a comprehensive understanding of the intervention’s effectiveness, ultimately guiding future improvements in patient care.

References

• Bates, D. W., et al. (2018). Medication errors: Prevention strategies and considerations. Journal of Patient Safety, 14(3), 145-152.
• Classen, D. C., et al. (2019). Global perspectives in medication safety. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 105(1), 132-139.
• Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Strategies for reducing medication errors. Health Affairs, 39(4), 567-574.
• Gandhi, T. K., et al. (2021). Improving medication safety through technological interventions. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 43(2), 96-105.
• Johnson, M. E., & Wilson, S. (2017). Post-implementation evaluation of healthcare interventions. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(3), 385-390.
• Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2022). Stakeholder engagement in healthcare quality improvement. Healthcare Management Review, 47(1), 24-30.
• Lei, H., et al. (2020). Data analysis methods in healthcare quality improvement. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 20(1), 123-130.
• O’Connor, P., et al. (2019). Challenges of implementing new health technologies. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(11), 334.
• Smith, J., et al. (2018). Measuring patient satisfaction: Tools and techniques. Patient Experience Journal, 5(2), 45-52.
• Williams, R., & Martinez, A. (2023). Continuous quality improvement in healthcare. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 38(1), 45-52.