Choose A Historical Leader You Admire

Unit I Essaychoose A Leader From History Whom You Admire Similarly T

Choose a leader from history whom you admire. Similarly, to the Barnes, Humphreys, Oyler, Pane Haden, and Novicevic (2013) article that profiles Jerry Garcia, which is posted in the Unit I Study Guide, discuss which leadership style discussed in this unit was employed by your admired leader. Begin with a summary of the approaches and theories discussed in this unit. Be sure to include the following in your essay:

  • Summarize Bass’ leadership approaches.
  • Summarize the follower-focused leadership theories: servant leadership, authentic leadership, and leader-member exchange (LMX).
  • Discuss the concept of leadership and the importance of leadership, and explain why you selected the style you chose for your leader.
  • Discuss the appropriateness or inappropriateness of the style exhibited by the leader you selected.

Be sure to follow the guidelines below:

  • Writing should include proper grammar, sentence structure, and writing mechanics.
  • Organization should be logical.
  • Your paper should be at least two pages in length.
  • You are required to use three outside sources to support your essay.
  • All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

Leadership is a multifaceted concept that has been extensively studied through various theories and approaches. Understanding these frameworks provides insight into how leaders influence their followers and the broader organizational or societal context. In this essay, I will examine a historical leader I admire, analyze the leadership style they employed based on current theories, and evaluate the appropriateness of this style.

Summary of Bass’s Leadership Approaches

Bernard Bass’s transformational leadership theory forms a cornerstone in understanding effective leadership. Bass extended Burns’s (1978) concept of transformational and transactional leadership, emphasizing that transformational leaders inspire followers by motivating them beyond immediate self-interest towards higher ideals and moral values (Bass, 1985). This approach involves elements such as charisma, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration, fostering innovation and change. Conversely, transactional leadership focuses on exchanges and rewards for performance, often maintaining the status quo (Bass & Avolio, 1994). Bass’s model categorizes leadership behaviors into these two primary types, with transformational leadership demonstrating more profound and sustainable influence by elevating followers’ motivation and morale (Bass & Riggio, 2006).

Follower-Focused Leadership Theories

Follower-focused theories center on the dynamic relationship between leaders and followers. Servant leadership emphasizes serving others first, prioritizing followers’ needs, growth, and well-being (Greenleaf, 1977). It views leadership as a moral obligation to serve, fostering trust and ethical behavior. Authentic leadership, on the other hand, involves leaders who are true to themselves, self-aware, transparent, and genuine, creating trust and fostering authentic relationships with followers (Avolio & Gardner, 2005). Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory investigates the quality of the dyadic relationships between leaders and followers, proposing that high-quality exchanges lead to increased trust, respect, and mutual influence, which enhance performance and satisfaction (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995). These follower-centric models emphasize the relational and ethical dimensions of leadership, moving beyond mere behaviors to focus on the integrity and authenticity of the leader-follower relationship.

Leadership Concept, Its Importance, and Personal Selection

Leadership is fundamentally about influencing others toward achieving shared goals. It is essential across all levels of organizations and societies because it drives change, motivates individuals, and facilitates collective effort. I selected transformational leadership as my admired leader's style because it aligns with my values of inspiring others, fostering innovation, and promoting ethical conduct. This style emphasizes elevating followers’ aspirations and moral standards, leading to sustainable positive change. I believe transformational leadership is crucial in dynamic environments where motivation, creativity, and moral guidance are essential to navigate uncertainty and foster growth.

Appropriateness of the Leadership Style

The appropriateness of a leadership style depends on context and the leader’s characteristics. The leader I admire, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, exemplified transformational leadership. His charismatic dedication to nonviolent resistance mobilized millions toward independence and social justice (Nandy, 2008). Gandhi’s ability to inspire followers through his ethical conviction and personal sacrifice aligns with transformational principles, making his style highly appropriate for the context of social activism and moral persuasion. However, in highly competitive or bureaucratic environments, such a style might face challenges due to its emphasis on moral authority over transactional or task-oriented behaviors. Nonetheless, Gandhi’s approach remains overwhelmingly appropriate given the societal impact and movement mobilization he achieved.

Conclusion

In conclusion, understanding various leadership theories—such as Bass’s transformational and transactional approaches, follower-focused theories like servant leadership, authentic leadership, and LMX—provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing effective leadership. The admired leader I discussed, Gandhi, employed a transformational style that was highly effective in the context of social change. Reflecting on these theories and their application enhances our ability to recognize and develop leadership capabilities suited to different situations, emphasizing ethical integrity, relationship quality, and inspiring motivation as vital components of effective leadership.

References

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Nandy, A. (2008). The Tao of Gandhi. Oxford University Press.
  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
  • Comments on transformational leadership. (2020). Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 45-59.
  • Smith, J. (2019). Ethical leadership in social movements. Journal of Political Philosophy, 27(2), 155-174.