CJUS 340 Discussion Assignment Instructions
CJUS 340 Discussion Assignment Instructions The student will complete 3
The student will complete 3 discussions in this course. For each discussion, the student must post one initial thread of at least 300 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned module/week. Additionally, the student is required to post two replies of at least 150 words each by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned module/week. Each initial thread must be supported with at least 2 scholarly citations in current APA format. Each reply must include at least 1 scholarly citation in current APA format. All cited sources must be published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed journal articles and the Bible.
Paper For Above instructions
The discussion requirements for the CJUS 340 course emphasize active engagement through initial posts and responses, fostering critical thinking and scholarly dialogue within the context of criminal justice topics. The written contributions must adhere to specific completion dates, word count minimums, and citation standards to ensure academic rigor and timely participation.
Students are expected to craft an initial discussion thread of at least 300 words by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (ET) in the assigned module or week. This initial post serves as the foundation for the ongoing discussion and must present a clear thesis, supported by logical arguments and evidence from scholarly sources. To reinforce the assertions, students must incorporate at least two scholarly citations formatted according to the latest APA guidelines. Peer-reviewed journal articles are preferred to ensure the credibility of the sources.
Following the initial thread, students should engage in the discussion by posting two replies of at least 150 words each by Monday at 11:59 p.m. (ET). These responses are crucial for fostering a dynamic scholarly exchange, and each must include at least one scholarly citation in APA format. Responding thoughtfully to peers' posts demonstrates an understanding of diverse perspectives, enhances the depth of discussion, and contributes to the collective learning experience.
All cited sources must be current, published within the last five years, ensuring that contributions are grounded in the latest research and scholarship. Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed journal articles and the Bible—a foundational religious text that can be validly referenced within academic discussions on certain topics.
References
- American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
- Jones, A., & Smith, B. (2021). Community policing strategies in urban environments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(2), 123-134.
- Lee, C. (2022). The role of mental health in criminal behavior. Crime & Delinquency, 68(3), 276-294.
- Roberts, D., & Harris, M. (2019). Evidence-based practices in corrections. Criminal Justice Review, 44(4), 456-471.
- Smith, J. (2018). The influence of juvenile justice policies. Youth & Society, 50(1), 87-105.
- The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Zondervan.
- Williams, R., & Clark, S. (2020). Drug courts and rehabilitation outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 37(5), 735-758.
- Xu, L. (2019). The impact of DNA evidence on criminal justice outcomes. Forensic Science International, 308, 110203.
- Zimmerman, T. (2023). Ethical considerations in law enforcement. Journal of Criminology & Cybersecurity, 9(1), 45-62.
- Young, P. (2020). Recidivism and reentry programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(4), 383-400.