Clinical Field Experience: Aligning Lessons 2 Teacher Inter

520 Clinical Field Experience B Aligning Lessons 2 Teacher Interview

Identify and interview two teachers from different school settings, such as public, charter, or private schools. Explore and document each teacher's instructional challenges, curricular demands, lesson planning methods and tools, differentiation strategies, utilization of technology, and how their curriculum and instruction align with the school’s vision, mission, and Continuous Improvement Plan. Additionally, review at least one lesson plan and supplemental material from each teacher that align with the curriculum and standards, analyzing how these materials support meeting all students' needs.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of gathering insights from multiple teachers across diverse educational settings provides a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and strategies involved in contemporary teaching. This paper synthesizes interviews conducted with two educators—one from Rocky Mountain Public Elementary School and the other from a project-based, Montessori-influenced charter school—highlighting their instructional challenges, planning processes, differentiation strategies, use of technology, and alignment with institutional goals.

Teacher Insights from Rocky Mountain Public Elementary School

Rocky Mountain Public Elementary—a Portuguese immersion school—presents unique instructional challenges rooted primarily in material resource limitations. As a teacher specializing in Portuguese, Professor Prestes faces the difficulty of sourcing or creating instructional materials suitable for young learners. Unlike traditional educators who might rely heavily on written lesson plans, Professor Prestes emphasizes a curricular map that schedules content weekly, supplemented by slides and activities. This approach streamlines planning and mitigates workload, aligning with the school’s emphasis on flexibility and resourcefulness.

Differentiating instruction in early childhood settings like this involves providing extra activities for gifted students—who follow routines and complete tasks independently—and tailoring support for low-performing students through small group work, individualized assistance, and targeted activities at designated centers. The teacher employs various technological tools such as Zearn, Xtra Math, and a Portuguese version of Lexia, integrating gamification via Nearpod lessons to enhance engagement. These strategies demonstrate a commitment to adapting instruction to meet diverse needs, particularly within the constraints of first-grade foundational learning.

Regarding curriculum alignment, Professor Prestes collaborates with colleagues twice weekly to ensure instructional practices mirror the school’s mission to foster bilingual competence, and they review how their activities support the district’s learning goals. Administrative support manifests through an innovation coach, instructional coach, intervention team, and principal, creating an environment conducive to integrating technology and differentiated instruction effectively.

Teacher Perspectives from a Project-Based, Montessori-Influenced Charter School

Contrasting with Professor Prestes, Tiffany, a teacher of 7th and 8th-grade special education math, faces broader mental health challenges among her students, including depression and anxiety. Her instructional approach emphasizes real-world relevance, leveraging project-based methods aligned with a Montessori model that emphasizes hands-on, student-centered learning. For instance, her lessons include practical applications like Shark Tank projects, integrating disciplines such as reading, art, science, and social studies to promote engagement and a holistic approach to education.

Lesson planning for Tiffany involves granular customization based on students’ IEP goals, with a focus on multi-sensory learning techniques—including physical objects, whiteboards, videos, and tactile activities—to help students grasp mathematical concepts. This approach aligns with the school's philosophy of avoiding traditional textbooks and problem-heavy worksheets, favoring experiential learning that meets diverse learners’ needs. She employs digital tools such as Khan Academy and Google Classroom, facilitating differentiated instruction and self-paced learning, particularly important in a setting where each student has a Chromebook and access to technology.

Tiffany’s curriculum connects deeply with the school's mission to cultivate lifelong learners through engaging, meaningful experiences. She also emphasizes creating a positive learning atmosphere that fosters curiosity and joy, which resonate with the school's goal of holistic development. Support from administration includes ongoing professional development, collaborative planning, and resources like classroom aides, all aimed at enhancing instructional quality and student outcomes.

Review of Lesson Plans and Supplemental Materials

Both educators provide resources that reflect their pedagogical philosophies and support their instructional objectives. Professor Prestes shares a weekly curricular map, supplemented by multimedia and interactive activities, effectively supporting differentiated learning despite limited traditional lesson planning. The materials are aligned with district and state standards, emphasizing oral language, reading, and foundational math skills suitable for early learners.

Tiffany’s lessons are highly experiential and project-based, with documented activities such as the ant-themed cross-curricular project. These lessons incorporate tactile and visual materials, group work, and real-world applications, demonstrating a clear connection to standards and learners' needs. The supplemental materials—such as food-dough manipulatives, sandpaper art, and live ant farms—support multisensory engagement, aligning with her goal to foster a love of learning while meeting diverse IEP needs.

Implications for Future Practice and Standards

These interviews highlight the importance of flexible, resourceful, and student-centered teaching practices. As future practitioners, it is essential to recognize that instructional planning practices can vary widely based on context, but the core principles of differentiation, integration of technology, and alignment to standards remain constant. Embracing collaborative planning, ongoing professional development, and integrating multisensory approaches are critical strategies to enhance effective teaching.

Furthermore, understanding and supporting the social-emotional needs of students, especially those with mental health challenges, must be prioritized. Creating a safe and stimulating classroom environment, supported by administrative guidance and resources, will foster both academic success and personal growth.

The standards outlined in the Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (PSEL) emphasize ethical and supportive leadership, advocating for equitable learning environments and continuous improvement. These interviews underscore the necessity for instructional leaders to promote innovative practices, foster collaboration, and provide targeted support—principles that are vital for progressing toward equitable and effective education systems.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the insights from the two teachers reveal the multifaceted nature of modern education—from resource challenges and curriculum alignment to differentiation and technology integration. Their practices exemplify how educators can adapt and innovate within their respective settings, emphasizing the learner’s needs, and adhering to institutional goals. Future practitioners can draw from these examples to cultivate inclusive, engaging, and standards-aligned classrooms that prepare all students for lifelong success.

References

• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. NIH Publication.
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Supporting Students' Mental Health and Well-being. Washington, D.C.
• Means, B., et al. (2014). Technology can enhance student engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(4), 397-432.
• McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
• Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-13.
• Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction. Council for Exceptional Children.
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
• Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximized leadership. Jossey-Bass.